On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 05:32:44PM -0700, David Bear wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 11:38:40PM +0100, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 03:01:38PM -0700, David Bear wrote:
> > > sorry to be stupid on cvs -- its always worked as documented on the
> > >
you checkout the source tree first, before updating ?
cheers,
--
Rafal Szczesniak mimir[at]diament.ists.pwr.wroc.pl
Samba Team member mimir[at]samba.org
+-+
*BSD, GNU/Linux and Samba http://www.samba.org
+-+
istributions.
Commonly, leaving 'guest account' parameter unset
is enough to get things working.
cheers,
--
Rafal Szczesniak mimir[at]diament.ists.pwr.wroc.pl
Samba Team member mimir[at]samba.org
+-+
*BSD, GNU/Linux and Samba http://www.samba.org
+-+
.
--
cheers,
+--+
| Rafal Szczesniak |
| mimir{at}diament.ists[dot]pwr.wroc.pl/
| *BSD, GNU/Linux and Samba /
|/
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 04:15:52PM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Richard Sharpe wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Bryan J. Smith wrote:
> >
> > No, not really. The \$ in the name of the trust account is an MS thing.
> > Samba requires a machine account be backed up on the ser
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 08:03:02PM +0100, "Szilvásy Zoltán" wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have an environment containing two NT4 domains, eg. DOM1 and DOM2.
> DOM1 and DOM2 are trusted. There's a machine running Debian Woody, on
> which I installed Samba, and made it to be a member of an NT4 domain
> (DOM1)
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 05:46:46PM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 10:10, Tim Potter wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 12:06:04AM +0100, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
> >
> > > > Attached patch can be seen as proposal to discuss behavior of gencache
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 08:01:51PM +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Attached patch can be seen as proposal to discuss behavior of gencache in
> case when it is used in applications running under non-priviledged
> accounts so that O_RDWR|O_CREAT always fails against system-wide
> lock_
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 12:15:59AM +0100, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 09:46:32AM +1100, Tim Potter wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 09:32:26PM +0100, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
> >
> > > Does anyone know what happened to CVS server ? Neither cvs tree
&
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 09:46:32AM +1100, Tim Potter wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 09:32:26PM +0100, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
>
> > Does anyone know what happened to CVS server ? Neither cvs tree
> > update nor browsing links on samba-cvs work. All started yesterday
> >
Does anyone know what happened to CVS server ? Neither cvs tree
update nor browsing links on samba-cvs work. All started yesterday
or day before (more-less).
--
cheers,
++
|Rafal 'Mimir' Szczesniak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
|*BSD, GNU/Lin
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 08:24:17AM -0600, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
>
> > Oh, it's being changed now, by me. I recently renamed the file and put
> > another trust-
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 06:38:49PM -0600, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
>
> > > I found it. Who came up with the function names? They're horrible!
> >
> &g
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 06:50:52PM -0500, Jim McDonough wrote:
>
> >> >And why are there two functions for changing a machine trust account?
> >> Dunno. Perhaps Rafal knows?
> >
> >Rafal know only what he read in the code. Are we talking about
> >net_rpc_join_oldstyle() and net_rpc_join_newstyle(
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 03:20:58PM -0500, Jim McDonough wrote:
>
> >And why are there two functions for changing a machine trust account?
> Dunno. Perhaps Rafal knows?
Rafal know only what he read in the code. Are we talking about
net_rpc_join_oldstyle() and net_rpc_join_newstyle() functions ?
J
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 02:09:45PM -0600, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Jim McDonough wrote:
>
> >
> > >Can someone confirm or deny that there is not net equivalent
> > >of "smbpasswd -j DOMAIN -R PDC" in HEAD? All I see r
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 01:23:31PM -0500, Bradley W. Langhorst wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-11-28 at 11:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi !
> >
> > Where the DOMAIN SID is stored when the LDAP backend is used ?
> >
> it's in one of the tdb files...
secrets.tdb, namely.
--
cheers,
+
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 05:44:21PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> unsubscribe me please
You can easily do it yourself using web interface at
http://lists.samba.org if you don't like doing it via email.
--
cheers,
++
|Rafal 'Mimir
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 12:58:24PM -0600, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> FYI...
>
> i would like to release 3.0alpha21 today or tomorrow.
> Are there any show stoperrs people are away (e.g. 3.0 does
> not work right now)? Remember that this is
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 04:33:05PM +0100, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
Cultivating long abandoned tradition of replying myself, I'm submitting
next revision of the last patch :-)
> > The rest of the patch looks good!
I hope the "difficult" part d
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 07:48:48PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Mimir,
>
> Thanks for the patch!
>
> A few comments:
>
> - in ipstr_list_add you try to be too fancy. I suspect the chunking
> stuff is to try to second guess the malloc implementation and
> allocate in bigger lumps? Don't
tation.
- NetBIOS name cache module.
-
- Copyright (C) Tim Potter, 2002
+ NetBIOS name cache module on top of gencache mechanism.
+
+ Copyright (C) Tim Potter 2002
+ Copyright (C) Rafal Szczesniak 2002
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or mo
ache_usage(int argc, const char **argv)
{
- d_printf(" net cache add \t add add new cache entry\n");
+ d_printf(" net cache add \t add new cache entry\n");
d_printf(" net cache set \t set new value for existing cache entry\n");
d_print
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 01:06:49AM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> Mimir: When you get your trustdom patch together, don't forget that:
>
> srv_netlog_nt.c:_net_trust_dom_list()
>
> also needs to be picked up for the DC side. - so far we are only getting
> it right in the SAMR call. Now that se
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 06:12:00PM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>
> > Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 01:22:26PM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
&g
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 05:15:24PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 01:22:26PM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > net help user suggests that net user add accepts optional -F use
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 01:22:26PM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> net help user suggests that net user add accepts optional -F user_flags,
> but in scanning the code, I don't see any flags being processed.
>
> Does the code actually accept flags?
>
> Can you use the above command to c
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 12:02:51PM -0700, James Bowes wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I am not a developer but I'd like to help with testing if needed. The
> roadmap indicates some areas of interest for me personally and if you
> could use the help.
>
> Trust relationships and the migration script would be s
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 09:45:03AM +0200, Olaf Frączyk wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 22:05, Shane Tapper wrote:
> >
> > How do I set the clock through a logon script if I wish to keep the user a
> > standard user
> >
> > line of logon script
> > net time \\viagra /set /yes
> You have to add
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 03:08:29AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
>
> > Seems like you'd like to see one more library as winbind's companion.
> > However, if libsmbclient is licensing stumbling block, then similar
> &
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 03:06:05PM +0200, Martin Wilck wrote:
> Am Mit, 2002-09-25 um 00.55 schrieb Andrew Bartlett:
>
> > As to unicode, I
> > have designated one call as being in utf8, to cope with external
> > interaction, so it's possible things can happen here.
>
> What matters to wine is t
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 02:01:26PM -0700, Josh Brown wrote:
> Anyone know what is causing this, and how I can keep it from cluttering
> up my log files?
>
>
>
> Username nobody is invalid on this system
You seem not to have such user in /etc/passwd. It is account used
in anonymous connectio
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 04:15:21AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 10:01:53AM -0500, Gerald Carter wrote:
> > > Everyone,
> > >
> > > I would like to do another alpha snapshot releas
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 10:01:53AM -0500, Gerald Carter wrote:
> Everyone,
>
> I would like to do another alpha snapshot release of the 3.0
> code base later this week. Does anyone know of any code that
> is too unstable for a release (seg faults, etc...)?
I've noticed just a few segfaults i
/Linux and Samba /
|__/
/*
Unix SMB/CIFS implementation.
Generic, persistent and shared between processes cache mechanism for use
by various parts of the Samba code
Copyright (C) Rafal Szczesniak2002
This program is free s
On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 12:54:47PM +0200, Simo Sorce wrote:
> I tested yesterday against w2k, if you passa bogis domain name it simply
> ignore and try against the local sam.
And that's what we can do as well. The thing is that it tries against
local sam instead of returning error.
This is what m
On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 02:11:05AM +0200, Simo Sorce wrote:
> Ok, that was clear, what I want to ask, is: why should we try to logon a
> user that provides bad information? Shouldn't we simply deny it with an
> error? How do NT behaves in such situations?
In case of incorrect credentials passed w
L PROTECTED]> |
|*BSD, GNU/Linux and Samba /
|__/
/*
Samba Unix/Linux SMB client library
Distributed SMB/CIFS Server Management Utility
Copyright (C) Rafal Szczesniak2002
This pr
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 05:01:25PM +0200, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-09-06 at 16:37, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 04:42:53PM +0200, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > >
> > > What are you trying to do there?
> > > Why should we replace a doma
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 04:42:53PM +0200, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-09-06 at 15:56, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > One is the username they wanted, the other is the username they got
> > (after the username map file). Similarly for domains - if the domain
> > they wanted is trusted, and we are
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 11:56:46PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 11:39:52PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > > Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This is a patch consisti
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 11:39:52PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
> >
> > This is a patch consisting of various fixes. Short list
> > includes:
> > - using user_info.client_domain structure (from user supplied auth info)
> >instead o
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 10:17:19AM +1000, Tim Potter wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 12:15:36PM +0200, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
>
> > This is first implementation of caching mechanism. It includes
> > both lib/gencache.c code and utils/net_cache.c as command-line
> &
I forgot to send patch with net_cache's entrypoint.
--
cheers,
++
|Rafal 'Mimir' Szczesniak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
|*BSD, GNU/Linux and Samba /
|___
processes cache mechanism for use
by various parts of the Samba code
Copyright (C) Rafal Szczesniak2002
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
the Free Software Foundation; either
RCS file: /cvsroot/samba/source/auth/auth_util.c,v
retrieving revision 1.50
diff -u -r1.50 auth_util.c
--- auth/auth_util.c30 Aug 2002 18:56:46 - 1.50
+++ auth/auth_util.c2 Sep 2002 10:37:30 -
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
Copyright (C) Andrew Tridgell 1992-1998
Copyright (C) Tim Potter 2000-2001
+ Copyright (C) Andrew Tridgell 2001
+ Copyright (C) Rafal Szczesniak 2002
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
@@ -581,19 +58
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 02:15:26PM -0500, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
> I'll just mention that the caching code in the ubiqx subdirectory is fully
> capable of handling all of this stuff.
Yes, I've seen ubi_cache. Though despite that it has very nice features
and looks good, it is more difficult
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 03:22:59PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Tim,
> >
> > > How about keeping basically the same API in namecache.c (i.e expiry
> > > based on time_t) but with an appropriate key prefix as you suggest?
> >
> > What I'd like to see is a lib/
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 04:59:01PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Tim,
>
> > How about keeping basically the same API in namecache.c (i.e expiry
> > based on time_t) but with an appropriate key prefix as you suggest?
>
> What I'd like to see is a lib/gencache.c module that provides a string
>
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 11:22:42AM +1000, Tim Potter wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 12:40:10AM +0200, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
>
> > After some talks on #samba-technical the idea of redesiging
> > namecache has raised. The problem is that current namecache
> > is proba
After some talks on #samba-technical the idea of redesiging
namecache has raised. The problem is that current namecache
is probably broken in some parts (as far as I and others have
seen) and yet another cache for trusted domain names is needed,
when we're just a domain member. I'm sure there's mu
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 04:02:15PM -0400, Deshpande, Kalyan (Kalyan)** CTR ** wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am interested in development effort. Please send me more details.
arrr, more details on what ? If you really want to help (and
feel ready to spend some time on it) just start coding and
send patches.
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 11:26:17AM -0400, Richard Bollinger wrote:
> from build_env.h:
> #define BUILD_ENV_UNAME "Linux LS01 2.0.38 #4 Wed Jun 6 14:22:03 EDT 2001 i586
>unknown"
> #define BUILD_ENV_DATE "Mon Aug 19 09:57:00 EDT 2002"
> #define BUILD_ENV_SRCDIR "."
> #define BUILD_ENV_BUILDDIR
>"
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 12:22:10PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am tring to use the new method available for printing (MS-RPC) from my Win NT
> 4.0 Clients to my Samba Box (FreeBSD)
> I have two problems:
> 1. The Printers Share that shows up under the server takes a long time to show
> u
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 12:20:27PM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 11:15:50AM +0200, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 09:29:44PM +0200, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > can you tell me which lines of proto do give you that error?
> > &
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 09:29:44PM +0200, Simo Sorce wrote:
> can you tell me which lines of proto do give you that error?
> just cut&paste the line with error thanks.
Never mind about that one. After one big "make clean", configure
and make went fine. Sorry for false alarm.
Makefiles creation s
Simo, could you fix recently changes commiting vfs code for samba ?
There're some minor errors with makefiles and function prototypes.
Typescript attached.
--
cheers,
++
|Rafal 'Mimir' Szczesniak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
|*BSD, GNU/Lin
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Gerald Carter wrote:
> Any objections? Does anyone use this?
Not me. I agree.
> It's a hacky solution which seems to be better
> accomplished with good print filters.
Yes, I also think Samba should not alter (in any way) the data to be
printed.
cheers,
+---
I know it's a bit provocative question, but are we going to use debug
classes ?
Such question is because I'm right in the middle of adding debug lines
in my code and if I can use classes it's better to do that now, instead of
rewriting all again later.
cheers,
+--
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Tim Potter wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 09:15:44AM +0200, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
>
> > > All the rpc client routines send the request and receive the reply,
> > > returning any useful data to the caller. If any subsequent calls are
> > &g
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Tim Potter wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 02:52:01PM +0200, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
>
> > proper args to continue or finish the enumeration. It may be annoying to
> > write such code in each place we use client side of enumeration, so I
> > pr
right (C) Paul Ashton 1997,2000,
- Copyright (C) Elrond 2000.
+ Copyright (C) Elrond 2000,
+ Copyright (C) Rafal Szczesniak 2002
This program is free software; you can redistri
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Ariel Mella wrote:
> how is the state of trust relationship between samba domain and NT 4
> domains?
Partly the job is done, but some code yet needs finishing.
> in what versions samba2.2x or samba3.x?
3.x
cheers,
+---
d 2000.
+ Copyright (C) Elrond 2000,
+ Copyright (C) Rafal Szczesniak 2002
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
@@ -537,
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Nathan Lutchansky wrote:
> Has anybody thought about or attempted to do this? Although IPv4
> addressing is deeply embedded in NBT, SMB has no IPv4 dependencies at all,
> so it is straightforward to run direct-hosted SMB (port 445) over IPv6.
Thought ? yes
Attempted ? no, u
On Sun, 14 Apr 2002, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 14 Apr 2002, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> >
> > > Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Here's the patch that adds server side of lsa_enum_trust_dom
On Sun, 14 Apr 2002, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
> >
> > Here's the patch that adds server side of lsa_enum_trust_dom call to
> > samba. Memory leak causing segfault to smbd in some cases is already
> > fixed. Major changes include:
>
&
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Jim McDonough wrote:
>
> Richard Sharpe wrote:
> >Luke Leighton's book is, perhaps, a good starting place. Unfortunately,
> >its name will not come to mind at the moment.
> DCE/RPC Over SMB - Samba and Windows NT Domain Internals
published by MacMillan Technical Publishing.
Here's the patch that adds server side of lsa_enum_trust_dom call to
samba. Memory leak causing segfault to smbd in some cases is already
fixed. Major changes include:
1. tdb_search_keys() is the new utility function searching the keys that
match given pattern. (tdbutil.c and tdbutil.h)
2.
ok, now I have lsa_enum_trust_dom call working properly. I fixed that
nasty mem leak bug and now it looks more stable. I'll send a patch as
soon as I clean up the diff file (tomorrow).
cheers,
++
|Rafal 'Mimir' Szczesniak <[EMAIL PROTEC
71 matches
Mail list logo
