Hi Chris,
I think the file safe_string.h should be equal in 3_0 and HEAD can you sync
them?
here's the current diff between them, there're no logic differences only
formating changes:
===
RCS file:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Tue Mar 4 09:33:34 2003
Author: abartlet
Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/printing
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv25296/printing
Modified Files:
nt_printing.c
Log
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 09:03:44AM -0600, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Wed Feb 12 06:38:18 2003
Author: abartlet
Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/printing
In directory
On 12 Feb 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$ cvs log -r1.9.2.14 tdb/tdbutil.c
revision 1.9.2.14
date: 2002/11/27 01:51:43; author: jra; state: Exp; lines: +21 -25
SMBencrypt needs dos codepage also. Change tdb_pack/unpack to take a
function pointer applied to all strings if it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16 Jan 2003, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
If you were going to start merging NTLMSSP changes across, then you need
to add ntlmssp.h, otherwise this looks like you just missed it when
merging includes.h/rpc_dce.h.
I was going to merge those changes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16 Jan 2003, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
The reason I didn't merge this on previous passes (yes, I've done
merging too) is that I don't agree that this should be in 'net'. There
isn't any logical connection for it to be here - it should probably be
On 16 Jan 2003, Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Win2k has a bug (feature?) where there is a connection reset if there is
a second connection from the SAME IP, before the first
session-setup.
So an unprivileged process on the client can cause a local denial of
service just by
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 12:50:57PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
On 16 Jan 2003, Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Win2k has a bug (feature?) where there is a connection reset if there is
a second connection from the SAME IP, before the first
session-setup.
So an unprivileged
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 12:50:57PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
On 16 Jan 2003, Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Win2k has a bug (feature?) where there is a connection reset if there is
a second connection from the SAME IP, before the first
session-setup.
So an unprivileged
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Fri Sep 27 01:02:37 2002
Author: abartlet
Update of /data/cvs/samba/source
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv18726
Modified Files:
configure.in configure
Log Message:
Readd the 2.2 --with-ldapsam paramaters so as
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Fri Sep 27 01:02:37 2002
Author: abartlet
Update of /data/cvs/samba/source
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv18726
Modified Files:
configure.in configure
Log Message:
Readd
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
OK, in HEAD I dropped 'ldap server' and 'ldap port' as parmaters, moving
to the 'passdb backend' scheme. However, this would mean that a valid
2.2 configuration would not function in 3.0.
This change (and the bit I forgot - making ldapsam the
: Re: CVS update: samba/source
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Wed Sep 11 14:08:32 2002
Author: jreilly
Update of /data/cvs/samba/source
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv31951
Modified Files:
Tag: APPLIANCE_HEAD
configure.in
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, REILLY,JOHN R (HP-Roseville,ex1) wrote:
Richard -
I'd be interested in your experiences, how you drove your unit tests,
what coverage target you hoped to achieve, etc. I don't believe the
specific numbers are as important doing the exercise causes. I think
several
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Tim Potter wrote:
This looks ok, but you did test the server code after you made
the changes right? Sorry, but I'm a little paranoid about this
code since it took me longer than it should have to work correctly
I did - we don't seem to return anything for key
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 10:05:57PM -0500, Gerald Carter wrote:
This looks ok, but you did test the server code after you made
the changes right? Sorry, but I'm a little paranoid about this
code since it took me longer than it should have to work correctly
I did - we don't
dunno what's up with samba-technical today...
I've got it working now.
(can't get a diff since cvs.samba.org is down just now)
probably this is the wrong fix but it does work.
line 790 of groupdb/mapping.c
/* list only the type or everything if UNKNOWN */
if
. This also applies to any
Debian 'Samba 2.999' snapshot during that window.
Andrew Bartlett
Original Message
Subject: CVS update: samba/source/registry
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 03:10:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 05:06:27PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
Date: Wed Jul 10 17:06:27 2002
Author: jra
Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/lib
In directory va:/tmp/cvs-serv20748/lib
Modified Files:
util.c
Log Message:
*Experimental* new large-scaling printer code.
Here's another example of a simple bug fix that was already in
HEAD, but never got applied to SAMBA_2_2 :-\
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Wed Jul 10 07:33:39 2002
Author: jerry
Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/param
In directory va:/tmp/cvs-serv7338/param
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 04:09:17PM -0500, Gerald Carter wrote:
congrats, that's a very good idea.
but what is the aim ? you got some drivers requiring server registry
access ?
Debugging more than anything else. Comparing PrinterData keys
between local and remote printers. Will
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modified Files:
Tag: SAMBA_2_2
clientgen.c clilist.c libsmbclient.c
Log Message:
Include the patches by Tom Jansen. I have fixed a couple of problems, and it
compiles, but I have not tested it.
However, this week I will, because
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard,
Is there a reason that this has to go into SAMBA_2_2?
I don't work in any other area at the moment.
It looks
like it could potentially de-stablize the libsmbclient library
and I
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Richard Sharpe wrote:
Is there a reason that this has to go into SAMBA_2_2?
I don't work in any other area at the moment.
That's not a real good reason IMO. The libsmbclient
code should be sync'd between HEAD and SAMBA_2_2
so you should be able to work in either
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Richard Sharpe wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Just watch in that sync-up - tridge fixed up some (quite serious) bugs
in the HEAD version (wins *registrations* in the client) and we don't
want them 'merged back'.
Hey, watch it with the flagrant
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, Tim Potter wrote:
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 06:26:33PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
Modified Files:
srv_spoolss_nt.c
Log Message:
Moved some notify related constants into srv_spoolss_nt.c since
they're only used there.
Added a PRINTER_NOTIFY_VERSION
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 11:34:43PM -0500, Gerald Carter wrote:
I'm writing some test routines for the print notification stuff and it's
rather a lot of mucking around. Can I do this after 2.2.5 ships and
before HEAD printing gets blown away?
Please don't mess with 2.2 printing before
On Thu, 16 May 2002, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
That will be good to see. I just want to see some movement here - or
else a release will never happen.
There's lots of movement going on. Have no fear. :-)
cheers, jerry
-
28 matches
Mail list logo
