On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 10:23:16AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Guestsam is in there to provide the only useful thing unixsam did -
ensuring that the guest account really was the guest, and had the guest
RID. It also helped with some Win2k behavior that assumed the presence
of the
Small patch to stop net rpc samsync from copying an empty comment when
syncing group data.
Cheers,
Waider.
Index: source/utils/net_rpc_samsync.c
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/samba/source/utils/net_rpc_samsync.c,v
retrieving revision 1.20
Hi !
I want to hide files with names beginning with . So I have
added following lines to my smb.conf (2.2.8):
? ? ? ? hide dot files = yes
? ? ? ? hide files = /.*
When user changes options in folder options to show hide files
and folders, he can see all files/folders beginning
Hello everyone, When I am programming a samba client in freeDOS,using wattcp, I found
a strange thing, which is not the same as rfc1002 claims.In rfc 1002,see below:
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 72]
RFC 1002 March 1987
5.2.2.2. RECEIVED PACKET PROCESSING
These are packets received after a
Hello All!
I've looked threw some docs of 2.2.8 and haven't yet seen anything.
Please forgive me if I may have missed something.
Is there SNAP Server support in Samba 2.2.8? If not, is there any plans
to support it in the future? I am aware that samba 3.0 has this
functionality.
I was
On Fri, 2003-03-28 at 23:55, Jianliang Lu wrote:
Now the users of admin users will not be locked.
admin users not the appropriate choice here. Better would be the
members of the 'domain admins' group. The interesting bit is finding
this out at the right point in time...
Yes, I agree
On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 19:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone, When I am programming a samba client in freeDOS,using wattcp,
I found a strange thing, which is not the same as rfc1002 claims.
In rfc 1002,see below:
So,during I write data or read data to server, it seems that server
Hi Alexander,
here're the following fixes:
1.) fix the logic when overloading vfs functions, the last vfs object
should be called at first!
2.) let vfs_load_old_plugin() return the vfs_op_tuple *
(Now this function has really no effect! :-)
metze
Hi all,
here's a small formatting fix to the new backtrace output in smb_panic()
metze
-
Stefan metze Metzmacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
backtrace.diff
Description: Binary data
At 12:25 31.03.2003 +0200, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 03:30, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
As per my recent commit, the new (VFS) modules system completely breaks
on tree disconnect!
We need to separate the different cases - the compat and the central
modules, and provide either a flag
At 13:02 31.03.2003 +0200, Simo Sorce wrote:
Eh, the shutdown stuff was just a thing, I was thinking yesterday ...
I agree we should have to way to startup and shutdown the modules, as we
have to way to load it (preload and fork).
to - two
this is what my patch is about :-)
the old modules
Hi,
the attached enhancements of SID related debug messages were quite
useful for me for tracking down where strange SIDs winbindd
complained about are coming from.
Being there I found that my suspicous SIDs are included in the
user token from DC on domain client validation, in the other
sids
On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 19:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All!
I've looked threw some docs of 2.2.8 and haven't yet seen anything.
Please forgive me if I may have missed something.
Is there SNAP Server support in Samba 2.2.8? If not, is there any plans
to support it in the future? I
Is the Samba Team interested in supporting SNAP for 2.x versions? If so
I can provide the patch.
Thanks!!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Andrew Bartlett
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 7:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 01:56:45PM +0200, Michael Steffens wrote:
the attached enhancements of SID related debug messages were quite
useful for me for tracking down where strange SIDs winbindd
complained about are coming from.
Being there I found that my suspicous SIDs are included in the
On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 18:52, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 10:23:16AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Guestsam is in there to provide the only useful thing unixsam did -
ensuring that the guest account really was the guest, and had the guest
RID. It also helped with
These are prebuilt NAS (network attached storage) servers with html gui
interfaces to configure. For more info go to
http://www.snapappliance.com/.
We buy 'em 'cause they're compact, stable, network ready, and have lots
of disk space.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Reilly
On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 03:30, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
As per my recent commit, the new (VFS) modules system completely breaks
on tree disconnect!
We need to separate the different cases - the compat and the central
modules, and provide either a flag or a function pointer to the correct
way to
On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 12:25, Simo Sorce wrote:
Eh, the shutdown stuff was just a thing, I was thinking yesterday ...
I agree we should have to way to startup and shutdown the modules, as we
have to way to load it (preload and fork).
to - two
This is mandatory for modules that uses databases
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
Given our 'rich' SAM backends I'd like to ask for your opinion on
changing the defaults for 'profile path' and 'logon home' to to
have workstation-local profiles be the default. NT does this, and we
change so much in the PDC anyway. The reason
At 13:31 31.03.2003 +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
Given our 'rich' SAM backends I'd like to ask for your opinion on
changing the defaults for 'profile path' and 'logon home' to to
have workstation-local profiles be the default. NT does this, and
On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 21:55, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
At 13:31 31.03.2003 +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
Given our 'rich' SAM backends I'd like to ask for your opinion on
changing the defaults for 'profile path' and 'logon home' to
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 11:30:42AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote about 'New modules
system and vfs_done':
As per my recent commit, the new (VFS) modules system completely breaks
on tree disconnect!
We need to separate the different cases - the compat and the central
modules, and provide
Currently the snap has a hard time reading Samba's domain users / groups
correctly. The patch (I did not write the code) simply fixes this
problem. It works fine on W2k servers, but I think it runs on a windows
appliance operating system. Not sure though.
-Original Message-
From: Paul
Andrew Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 06:12, Green, Paul wrote:
Green, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The 2.2.8 release notes say:
A buffer overrun condition exists in the SMB/CIFS packet
fragment re-assembly code in smbd which would allow
Hi Alexander,
here's the small fix witchh corrects the vfs objects order
metze
-
Stefan metze Metzmacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
vfs-fix-02.diff
Description: Binary data
Now the users of Domain Admins will not be locked. But until we have not
the right provilege for Domain Admins, I will continue to use the admin
users for administrator's use (like add machine, user manager for domain...).
In attach is the new patch.
Jianliang Lu
TieSse s.p.a.
Via Jervis, 60.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
We've just posted another snapshot of the SAMBA_3_0 cvs tree
for download. This is a non-production release provided for
testing only. Note that this release **does** contain the
security fixes included in the Samba 2.2.8 release.
The source code
i'm also seeing some aberrant ACL-setting behavior in samba 2.2.8. more-
over, the new Creator Owner and Creator Group semantics are bewildering,
although i can understand if, in that sense, they're just mimicking NT
behavior all the more closely. at any rate, below's a patch that purports
to do
Irving,
Applying patches to your Snap Server is probably not a good idea, and
usually impossible since the box doesn't have a compiler or the smbd source
we use. If you're putting in a patched binary, that also may have unintended
effects. I just don't want you to get your box in an unsupported
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 08:07:16PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 19:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone, When I am programming a samba client in freeDOS,using
wattcp, I found a strange thing, which is not the same as rfc1002 claims.
In rfc 1002,see below:
Thanks for your response!
The patch that I applied was applied to the Samba Server not the Snap.
It was a patch given to me by someone on this list (I'll have to look
for his name to give him proper credit). It was written for Samba
Version 2.2.3 but it is working for me in version 2.2.6. We
Ok, so the patch was to a Samba PDC, now this all makes more sense to me :).
This is not something that our organization has ever tracked, but I'm glad
the Samba community could help you in providing a fix to the PDC. Since
we've never tracked it (The Tech was right, it is not officially
Is there a plan for a patch for 2.0.6 to address the security bug announced 3/14/03?
If not, I am requesting such a patch, as upgrading to 2.2.8 will cause difficulty in
our environment.
(the Take Ownership overloading no longer works in 2.2.8, so emply ACE's don';t show
up in the permission
Sorry, forgot to cc the list...
Jerry, you made some comments around the code I modified, maybe you
could take a look at this and comment??
Don
-Original Message-
From: MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 16:30
To: 'tony shepherd'; MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1);
'[EMAIL
Samba Performance testing
==
1.0 Architecture:
-
Server:
CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) III CPU family 1266MHz
Memory: 1GB
Kernel: Linux 2.4.18
File System: xfs-1.1
Samba version: 3.0-alpha19
Network: 1 GB point to point
Client:
1/2 GB memory and 1.6 GHZ
Please resend with a mailer that doesn't wrap at 80 columns :-).
Jeremy.
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 10:41:25PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please resend with a mailer that doesn't wrap at 80 columns :-).
Jeremy.
Looks more like 55 c
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 10:41:25PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please resend with a mailer that doesn't wrap at 80 columns :-).
Jeremy.
Looks more like 60 columns.
--
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)-
How do bug fixes work? Do they go through some sort of review? Who
decides whether they get put into the next release?
As Sun is now distributing Samba as part of the OS (started in Solaris 9),
we are tracking this issue as bugID: #4839885.
tony
--On Monday, March 31, 2003 04:29:57 PM
Jeremy,
I apologise for the format hassle. Hope this works.
Cheers
Ravi
Please resend with a mailer that doesn't wrap at 80 columns :-).
Jeremy.
Samba Performance testing
==
1.0 Architecture:
-
Server:
CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) III CPU family
If I have 2 wins server set in smb.conf like the following:
wins server = 172.16.0.61, 172.16.10.8
I can verify that only the first works, the second does not, because the 2
wins servers have different contents in them, one for some domains and the
other for some other domains. I have trusted
Thank you all.
For the case 1.there will be many echo overhead.And I have no way to know the server
timeout when I am in client, so I can't determinate when to send echo packet.
For case 2, I have though over it. suppose there is such a situation:
when I WriteRaw data to server and server
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 04:04:30PM -0800, Chere Zhou wrote:
If I have 2 wins server set in smb.conf like the following:
wins server = 172.16.0.61, 172.16.10.8
I can verify that only the first works, the second does not, because the 2
wins servers have different contents in them, one for
Hi all,
I'm trying to get the latest CVS version running on solaris 8, and it
seems that it has some problems with the print shares.
Namely - when I try to connect via smbclient to a shared printer, it
passes the auth phase only to come up with an error message like:
tree connect failed:
CL!
On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 23:08, Ulf Bertilsson wrote:
I look into this in a few days.
Use www.birrabrothers.com/tiger/data/samba as mirror
I'm on vacation and don't have the info here.
Yes, now everything is fine.
--
Uber
Amiga rulez ;D
By default machine account passwords are changed ever 7 days in MS world.
you can change this via the machine password timeout smb.conf parameter.
Hope this helps,
Don
-Original Message-
From: Joey Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 20:10
To: Gerald (Jerry)
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 09:30:07AM -0500, Irving Carrion wrote:
Currently the snap has a hard time reading Samba's domain users / groups
correctly. The patch (I did not write the code) simply fixes this
problem. It works fine on W2k servers, but I think it runs on a windows
appliance
48 matches
Mail list logo
