-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16 Jan 2003, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
If you were going to start merging NTLMSSP changes across, then you need
to add ntlmssp.h, otherwise this looks like you just missed it when
merging includes.h/rpc_dce.h.
I was going to merge those changes
I tested using the same hardware for windows client and the server, same
setup and configuration. Network bandwidth was gigabits. I built both 2.2.5
and 3.0alpha21 from source.
Here are my numbers for a single windows 2000 client, single samba server
test. For reads, 2.2.5 gets 120 Mbps,
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Chere Zhou wrote:
I tested using the same hardware for windows client and the server, same
setup and configuration. Network bandwidth was gigabits. I built both 2.2.5
and 3.0alpha21 from source.
Here are my numbers for a single windows 2000 client, single samba
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16 Jan 2003, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
The reason I didn't merge this on previous passes (yes, I've done
merging too) is that I don't agree that this should be in 'net'. There
isn't any logical connection for it to be here - it should probably be
On 16 Jan 2003, Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Win2k has a bug (feature?) where there is a connection reset if there is
a second connection from the SAME IP, before the first
session-setup.
So an unprivileged process on the client can cause a local denial of
service just by
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 12:50:57PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
On 16 Jan 2003, Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Win2k has a bug (feature?) where there is a connection reset if there is
a second connection from the SAME IP, before the first
session-setup.
So an unprivileged
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 12:50:57PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
On 16 Jan 2003, Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Win2k has a bug (feature?) where there is a connection reset if there is
a second connection from the SAME IP, before the first
session-setup.
So an unprivileged
Hi all,
Last night I did a grep -i todo in the source code, to see
if I could contribute a little bit more ;-) I found the
following:
smbd/chgpasswd.c: /* TODO: Add cracklib support here */
I started working on this last night (using SAMBA_3_0
branch) and do have something working (the
In version 2.2.6 there was a change in util_sec.c that causes Samba to fail
on OS X due to use of setregid(). Previously, Samba worked flawlessly on
OS X. Apparently this is also a problem in other BSD-based operating
systems, as this sparse bug report indicates in its headers:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 01:07:34AM -0500, Michael Bennett wrote:
So... comments? Does the patch Do The Right Thing? Think this patch or
something similar could get merged sometime? :)
I remember looking at this patch. The problem is it does something
like :
#ifdef *BSD..
new
Pierre,
Sounds interesting. Please keep this going as there is a lot of interest
in forced secure password change process.
Strongly suggest getting the official sources updated, as you have already
suggested. There should be someone who might want to help get this into
the official code tree.
11 matches
Mail list logo