Le 28/09/2013 01:15, Jim Jenkins a écrit :
Hey Gang,
I'm stuck near the end of installing Samba 4 on a Debian Wheezy machine.
I'm trying to connect to a Win2k AD.
Basically I can't get getent passwd to show domain accounts. I also
can't access shares using my credentials. What did I forget?!
Hi,
I am trying to get vfs_recycle working on Samba 4, I compiled Samba 4
myself, so the man page for vfs_recycle is in:
/usr/local/samba/share/man/man8/vfs_recycle.8
I have the recycle bin working on a share, the problem I have is with
lists, for instance, how to list which files to exclude.
Hello,
I would like to understand if it's possible to use /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow
like backend for LDB.
If not, would it be possible to use samba-tool or something similar to create
the new user with password hash in MD5?
Is there perhaps an API to Samba4 which can be used for user
I tryed bind as backend. But the problem was still the same: can't use
samba-tool dns to query. There were same errors in log.samba:
...
dnsserver: Failed to find DNS Zones in
CN=MicrosoftDNS,DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=dotest,DC=com
...
In the end I finded the solution. I config the dns zone in win2003.
I have been using 'net ads testjoin' but the issue is it seems to ask for a
password when the box is not joined to a domain (even if I specify '-U
username%pass'). This *seems* like a bug - I would expect it to pass or
fail using the creds passed in.
Is this by design and if so, why? Is there a
Hi aps,
I have been using 'net ads testjoin' but the issue is it seems to ask for a
password when the box is not joined to a domain (even if I specify '-U
username%pass'). This *seems* like a bug - I would expect it to pass or
fail using the creds passed in.
Is this by design and if so, why?
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Denis Cardon
denis.car...@tranquil-it-systems.fr wrote:
Hi aps,
I have been using 'net ads testjoin' but the issue is it seems to ask for
a
password when the box is not joined to a domain (even if I specify '-U
username%pass'). This *seems* like a bug - I
On Sun, 2013-09-29 at 01:07 +0200, Marc Muehlfeld wrote:
Hello,
in Samba 3 I had all TDBs on one place configured through lock
directory. Now I saw that Samba 4 split the location of the database
files into lock/state/cache directory.
*Question 1*: The manpage says state directory is
On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 13:46 +, Miroslav Kolar wrote:
Hello,
I would like to understand if it's possible to use /etc/passwd and
/etc/shadow like backend for LDB.
If not, would it be possible to use samba-tool or something similar to create
the new user with password hash in MD5?
Is
On Thu, 2013-09-26 at 16:12 +0200, Klaus Hartnegg wrote:
Hi,
most file access rights sync between ACLs of linux and the security tab
of windows file properties, but not all. Where are the other infos stored?
I tried in linux 'getfattr -d' and 'samba-tool ntacl get', but neither
output
Hello Andrew,
Am 30.09.2013 21:55, schrieb Andrew Bartlett:
*Question 1*: The manpage says state directory is for persistent and
cache directory for non-persistent data. Ok. That's clear. But what is
stored in the lock directory and what is the reason why its content
isn't placed in one of the
Andrew, in my company we are also experiencing a higher CPU usage of Samba
4 (smbd) if compared to Samba 3.
In fact, it almost reaches 100% of CPU and uses all the memory during *dir
copies* (individual file copy is as good as samba 3's). I strongly believe
that this CPU usage is the responsible
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 05:21:44PM -0300, Thiago Fernandes Crepaldi wrote:
Andrew, in my company we are also experiencing a higher CPU usage of Samba
4 (smbd) if compared to Samba 3.
In fact, it almost reaches 100% of CPU and uses all the memory during *dir
copies* (individual file copy is
El 26/09/13 16:09, Neurodesarrollo escribió:
Hi List, I'm new in the list and with Samba4
I was installed, samba4 ver. 4.0.9 in a server with openSUSE 12.3, 32 bits.
Previously I had samba3.6.x installed in my server, the users could
access to /home/(users) as like as users drive (U:) and
On 30/09/13 21:45, Neurodesarrollo wrote:
El 26/09/13 16:09, Neurodesarrollo escribió:
Hi List, I'm new in the list and with Samba4
I was installed, samba4 ver. 4.0.9 in a server with openSUSE 12.3, 32 bits.
Previously I had samba3.6.x installed in my server, the users could
access to
Agreed. For some strange reason I though perf would follow the new smbd
forked and account their data too =)
Unfortunately, I don't have the libc symbols (at least for today) to see
what is going on there, but here is what I got in the child smbd process on
the server side. The client side is a
Hi again,
Thanks again, Denis, Steve and Rowland for your previous answers about
RFC2307 and winbind.
Maybe I'm an dreamer but here is that I wanted to achieve :
Ubuntu server 12.04.3, samba4 as PDC, several NICS : 1 LAN and 2/3 WANS
Use a windows VM (on this server) to control AD through
On Tue, 2013-10-01 at 15:48 +1100, m...@electronico.nc wrote:
Hi again,
Thanks again, Denis, Steve and Rowland for your previous answers about
RFC2307 and winbind.
Maybe I'm an dreamer but here is that I wanted to achieve :
Ubuntu server 12.04.3, samba4 as PDC, several NICS : 1 LAN and
Hi Andrew,
Thanks a lot for your answer!
I understand your point. This is actually the way I want to go.
But before doing so, I need to migrate my users from /etc/passwd to LDB. I'd
like to do it without letting them know and a need to ask them to change their
password.
Do you think it's
The autobuild test system has detected an intermittent failing test in
the current master tree.
The autobuild log of the failure is available here:
http://git.samba.org/autobuild.flakey/2013-09-30-1343/flakey.log
The samba3 build logs are available here:
20 matches
Mail list logo
