I upgraded the client, (from 3.0.0-15 to 3.0.10) the server remains
the same (3.0.4), it seems like the linux client changed it's behavior
regarding following links on the server side.
Any ideas ?
Thanks, Pablo
On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 08:42:35 -0600, Paul Gienger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Aft
THANK YOU ...
That did it I guess will keep my job. ;-)
Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 02:52:46PM -0500, Russell Polo wrote:
in reply to this message :
http://www.mail-archive.com/samba@lists.samba.org/msg54046.html
I have the same problem. I have an old Redhat 7.3 box that I
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 02:52:46PM -0500, Russell Polo wrote:
> in reply to this message :
> http://www.mail-archive.com/samba@lists.samba.org/msg54046.html
>
> I have the same problem. I have an old Redhat 7.3 box that I am trying
> to replace with a FC3 box..
>
> when the FC3 box mounts samba
in reply to this message :
http://www.mail-archive.com/samba@lists.samba.org/msg54046.html
I have the same problem. I have an old Redhat 7.3 box that I am trying
to replace with a FC3 box..
when the FC3 box mounts samba directories the symlinks show up as
symlinks ( and are invalid as they point
I upgraded the client, (from 3.0.0-15 to 3.0.10) the server remains
the same (3.0.4)
Regards, Pablo
On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 08:42:35 -0600, Paul Gienger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >After upgrading to fedora core 3 and therefore to samba 3.0.10 I found
> >
> >
> Who did you upgrade? client or ser
After upgrading to fedora core 3 and therefore to samba 3.0.10 I found
Who did you upgrade? client or server?
that the link in the samba folder is broken because it's pointing to a
non existen directory in my machine instead of pointing to the
directory located in the server.
Try looking f
