Yes, I sometimes overlook the regular expression definitions.
On 16 January 2017 at 19:12, James Bonfield wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 06:56:39PM +0800, Colin Hercus wrote:
> > I always thought "*" was for sequence not stored rather than that the
> > sequence is zero length. But as it work
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 06:56:39PM +0800, Colin Hercus wrote:
> I always thought "*" was for sequence not stored rather than that the
> sequence is zero length. But as it works I'll stick with it.
You are correct that "*" is unspecified rather than zero size, but the
specification states the seque
Hi Rob,
I tried that and it worked. Thanks.
I always thought "*" was for sequence not stored rather than that the
sequence is zero length. But as it works I'll stick with it.
Cheers, Colin
On 16 January 2017 at 17:54, Robert Davies wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2017, Colin Hercus wrote:
>
> Sometim
On Mon, 16 Jan 2017, Colin Hercus wrote:
> Sometimes we get reads to align that have been trimmed to zero length and
> I'm wondering how these should be represented in SAM format.
>
> Here's a pair as reported by Novoalign that had been trimmed by cutadapt
> and one read of the pair is zero length
Hi,
Sometimes we get reads to align that have been trimmed to zero length and
I'm wondering how these should be represented in SAM format.
Here's a pair as reported by Novoalign that had been trimmed by cutadapt
and one read of the pair is zero length
READID77*00**0
