[sane-devel] Sane Release 1.1.0 ?

2008-11-03 Thread stef
Le Wednesday 29 October 2008 19:59:09 Julien BLACHE, vous avez ?crit?: Nicolas Martin nicolas.martin at freesurf.fr wrote: ... Also calling the current CVS SANE 2.0 is really a bad joke given there's only very little changes compared to SANE 1.0. I don't think it's warranted and I don't

[sane-devel] Epson Perfection V200 Photo

2008-11-03 Thread Torquil Macdonald Sørensen
Ok, thanks. And I guess the sane-find-scanner just tries to identify any scanner connected to the system, regardless of sane supporting it or not. Then I will try some more to get the 32-bit iscan program working on the 64-bit computer with 64-bit ubuntu. I'd rather not have to install a

[sane-devel] Sane Release 1.1.0 ?

2008-11-03 Thread Julien BLACHE
stef stef.dev at free.fr wrote: Hi, Whenever a frontend built against SANE 1.0 receive one of the new status, it shows the error properly. Like SANE_STATUS_COVER_OPEN, JAMMED or NO_DOCS, in case of SANE_STATUS_WARMING_UP user has to correct the error condition (in this case just

[sane-devel] High Volume document scanning !!

2008-11-03 Thread Rod De Beer
attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20081103/266029e9/attachment.htm

[sane-devel] High Volume document scanning !!

2008-11-03 Thread m. allan noah
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 4:44 AM, Rod De Beer REDeBeer at dla.gov.za wrote: hi Allan Thanks so much for your reply ! A little more info -: i am going with the idea of dropping the windows based scanning system loading Linux on my severs and workstations and looking for a linux based

[sane-devel] High Volume document scanning !!

2008-11-03 Thread Jeremy Johnson
On Monday 03 November 2008 07:00:04 m. allan noah wrote: On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 4:44 AM, Rod De Beer REDeBeer at dla.gov.za wrote: hi Allan Thanks so much for your reply ! A little more info -: i am going with the idea of dropping the windows based scanning system loading

[sane-devel] DocketPORT 465 Scanner

2008-11-03 Thread Steven Melendez
I apologize if this topic has been covered before, but does anyone know if any work has been done to support the DocketPORT 465 scanner? sane-find-scanner gives the following string found USB scanner (vendor=0x0a82, product=0x4802, chip=GL841?) at libusb:002:004 but scanimage says no SANE

[sane-devel] DocketPORT 465 Scanner

2008-11-03 Thread Jack McGill
The Docketport 465 is not currently supported by Sane. It could be added to the 84x fork of the genesys backend. This scanner is manufactured by the company formerly known as Syscan, and currently known as Document Capture Technologies, www.docucap.com. Docucap scanners are sold by Ambir, Pentax,