Greetings,
having spent the better part of last week hunting down a bug in one of
my scripts which utterly failed to OCR the files produced by "scanim-
age", I finally found the cause to be the way "scanimage" interprets its
options:
$ scanimage --device pixma:MX880_192.168.2.199 --format ti
Wes,
On Monday, 2018-05-14 16:08:24 -0700, you wrote:
> ...
> I am trying to get the system working on a new computer with Ubuntu 16.04.
> We have modified the fujitsu.c file but we are getting an error message. I
> don't have the exact message but it was to the effect that an option was
> not en
Jeff,
On Tuesday, 2018-05-15 08:22:20 +0200, you wrote:
> ...
> If you are only using scanimage then you can only find the dependencies
> out by trial and error, using the --help output for each different
> combination of options. i.e. the output from:
>
> scanimage --depth=1 --mode=color --help
Greetings,
whenever I'm starting "scanimage" I get a bundle of error messages:
$ SANE_CONFIG_DIR=$HOME/.config/sane scanimage --device
pixma:MX880_192.168.2.199 -T
[bjnp] udp_command: ERROR - no data received (timeout = 1000)
[bjnp] bjnp_init_device_structure: Cannot read mac address, skipping t
Louis,
sorry for the delay ... due to other obligations it took me a while to
get back to this problem ...
On Wednesday, 2018-06-06 23:12:24 +0200, you wrote:
> ...
> Before we jump into the timeout issue, let's first get the basics
> sorted out:
> - what does a simple "scanimage -L" report?
Greetings,
last June I started a thread on this list with the subject 'Error mess-
ages when starting "scanimage"'. This eventually turned into an off-
list discussion with Louis Lagendijk about the network aspect of this
problem. In the course of this discussion I sent Louis plenty of d
Olaf,
On Saturday, 2019-04-06 15:27:47 +0900, you wrote:
> ...
> >bjnp-timeout=100
> >bjnp://192.168.2.199/timeout=5000
> >bjnp-timeout=100
>
> According to the manual page, the first line has effect. The second is
> only applied for the scanner at that IP address. Everything else
Olaf,
On Saturday, 2019-04-06 21:13:07 +0900, you wrote:
> ...
> There is one thing that bothers me a bit though and that's the occurence
> of *six* timeouts, at least in Rainer's case.
This may have to do with my WiFi router: it knows about exactly seven
devices, including the scanner/prin
Louis,
On Saturday, 2019-04-06 15:14:46 +0200, you wrote:
> ...
> I just started wondering if there is a command that is not accepted in
> case of this specific scanner. I have never seen that before, but who
> knows...Will need destailed traces to check that...
>
> @Rainer, to be sure can you d
Louis,
On Wednesday, 2019-04-10 14:22:26 +0200, you wrote:
> ...
> It is good to see this solved. Given the somewhat nasty behavior of
> your router, you might want to give your printer a fixed address:
> reduce the DHCP range on the router (Einstellungen -> Netwerk) and set
> the end of the DHCP
Greetings,
still using Ubuntu 16.04 I've installed "scanimage" from Rolf's PPA:
$ scanimage --version
scanimage (sane-backends) 1.0.27git; backend version 1.0.27
$ scanimage -d pixma:MX880_new-host --format png
PNG support not compiled in
$
What's the reason for not supporting PNG? Do I have to
Rolf,
On Saturday, 2019-06-01 18:20:17 +0200, you wrote:
> ...
> I just fixed the ppa build dependencies for trusty and xenial. Newer
> Ubuntu versions are not affected. The ppa is building now.
Works like a charm ... :-)
Thank you,
Rainer
--
sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@alioth-lists
Greetings,
since quite some time I have been successfully using "scanimage" on my
laptop running Ubuntu 16.04 to scan from a Canon Pixma MX 885 scanner
connected via WiFi.
Under Ubuntu 16.04 the "sane" package itself was version 1.0.14-11, but
packages "libsane", "libsane-common", and "sa
Ralph,
On Tuesday, 2019-12-03 07:39:14 -0800, you wrote:
> ...
> You don't say if you did adf scanning successfully on Ubuntu although I
> assume that is the case.
> Could you confirm that?
Yes, I can :-)
The "scanimage" binary I used under Ubuntu worked with all the options
regarding scan so
Olaf,
On Wednesday, 2019-12-04 21:29:05 +0900, you wrote:
> ...
> In that case, I suggest you upgrade to at least 1.0.28 and possibly even
> to something later on our master branch.
Gentoo currently does not provide a newer version than 1.0.27-r3. And
if the information I found at
https:/
Bruce,
On Thursday, 2019-12-05 06:38:52 +1000, you wrote:
> ...
> I have put together a gentoo overlay for sane-backends with version
> 1.0.28. Can you test this?
>
> https://github.com/brulzki/sane-overlay
I followed the installation instructions in your "README.md" file, first
created file
Bruce and All,
On Thursday, 2019-12-12 23:44:38 +1000, Bruce Schultz wrote:
> ...
> Rainer can you try now with the sane-backends-.ebuild, which will
> install the current git version of the backends. I'm hopeful that having
> something at least as recent as the known working version may wo
Bruce and All,
On Tuesday, 2019-12-17 07:07:14 +1000, Bruce Schultz wrote:
> ...
> You could try rebuilding the backends with the following command:
>
> EGIT_OVERRIDE_COMMIT_SANE_PROJECT_BACKENDS=6b7052c4 ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="**"
> emerge -av1 =media-gfx/sane-backends-
>
> That will install gi
Olaf,
it's been a while, and I was busy solving more pressing problems. Now
I'm back again to tackle this scanning issue.
On Sunday, 2019-12-15 16:41:01 +0900, you wrote:
> ...
> > I know about the existence of environment variable "SANE_DEBUG_BJNP" but
> > have no idea what value to set it t
Olaf,
On Friday, 2020-01-31 18:08:28 +0900, you wrote:
> ...
> This shouldn't be anything to worry about but I've submitted an issue
> for it. You can find it at:
>
> https://gitlab.com/sane-project/backends/issues/235
>
> If you could add distribution/version info as well as attach your
> c
Bruce,
On Thursday, 2020-02-06 06:47:53 +1000, you wrote:
> ...
> Also, what options are you passing in to ./configure ?
Currently the not $PREFIX related options I'm using are
$ ./configure --disable-avahi --disable-dynamic --disable-nls \
--enable-ipv6 --enable-pre
Olaf,
this is my second try to answer your mail because the first was held due
to being more than 100 kB in size, and I then cancelled it.
On Wednesday, 2020-02-05 18:47:14 +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> ...
> So, if HAVE_LIBJPEG is not defined (check include/sane/config.h), that
> compiled san
Olaf,
On Saturday, 2020-02-08 12:12:00 +0900, you wrote:
> ...
> > I've appended file "config.status" below. However, file "config.log" is
> > about 300+ kB in size and thus would be quarantained again. Is it ok to
> > mail it only to you privately?
>
> You already did ;-)
> By sending mail to
Olaf,
On Saturday, 2020-02-08 12:52:49 +0900, you wrote:
[ "> >" refers to Bruce Schultz' mail ]
> ...
> > That fails now for me with the same error you error you had.
>
> For me too (on our CI's debian-10-full setup with 336cbdfd as well as
> 1.0.29) but I also get a pile of multiple definitio
Olaf,
On Tuesday, 2020-02-11 17:50:54 +0900, you wrote:
> ...
> > # Since I'm only specifying a single backend anyway, why not include it
> > # right into the binary rather than load it at start-up?
>
> Why not make that backend your libsane instance?
And how to do that? Or is that what happ
Olaf,
On Wednesday, 2020-02-12 20:17:17 +0900, you wrote:
> ...
> You could copy your libsane-$BACKEND.* to wherever libsane.* gets
> installed, i.e. $libdir in ./configure terms.
Ok, since I'm currently installing into my home directory, I get
$ ls -lp lib/
total 336
-rwxr-xr-x 1 rain
Olaf,
I promised to run tests using the current version of "sane-backends" as
well as my Canon Pixma scanner. I used a three sheets, six pages color
original and scanned with "--source 'ADF Duplex'":
Test 1: Run with "export SANE_DEBUG_BJNP=127". After scanning the 4-th
page successf
Olaf,
On Friday, 2020-02-14 14:28:16 +0100, I myself wrote:
> ...
> I've compressed the debug output from tests 1 and 3, but the files are
> still huge:
>
>$ ls -l *.bz2
>-rw--- 1 rainer rainer 28659462 2020-02-14 13:35 paperjam.log.bz2
>-rw--- 1 rainer rainer 56919612 2020
Allan,
On Friday, 2020-02-14 11:36:43 -0500, you wrote:
> Did you compress the file?
Yes, of course. After all the "*.bz2" files were already there :-)
Sincerely,
Rainer
Olaf,
On Saturday, 2020-02-15 11:13:32 +0900, you wrote:
> ...
> > What's next? Reduce the value of "SANE_DEBUG_BJNP"? But I can't guar-
> > antee I can reproduce this particular behaviour.
>
> That's probably the best solution even though that would change the
> timing of events leading to w
Olaf,
On Friday, 2020-02-14 17:32:39 +0100, I myself wrote:
> ...
> So I bit the bullet and created just another account in order to submit
> an issue. Again in vain: "File is too big (27.33MiB). Max filesize:
> 10MiB".
Ok. So be it. I meanwhile remembered one of my scripts which divides
Greetings,
since our good ol' Canon Pixma MX885 has eventually reached its End Of
Life, we've bought a Canon Maxify MB5150. And because
http://www.sane-project.org/sane-mfgs.html
listed this scanner as using the same "pixma" backend as the MX885, I
just had to update the IP address in "
Andrea,
On Wednesday, 2021-05-19 23:16:43 +0200, you wrote:
> ...
>
> I'm not replying as an expert here, only to ask a question: Does you
> Maxify scan both sides in one shot from ADF or does it turn the page to
> scan the other side?
Yes, it does it in one shot, if Duplex is activated. Co
Ralph,
On Wednesday, 2021-05-19 18:21:57 -0700, you wrote:
> ...
> Some of the pixma devices seems to have a completely different engine
> for generating scans from the ADF compared to the flatbed.
> For ADF, they return JPEG data to SANE instead of the normal raster data
> that we get from flatb
Ralph,
On Wednesday, 2021-05-19 18:21:57 -0700, you wrote:
> ...
> On 2021-05-19 8:46 a.m., Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
> > ...
> > - The PNG file from the flatbed clearly showed the original paper hav-
> > ing been rather thin, since some colours from the reverse sid
Ralph and Others,
On Wednesday, 2021-06-30 12:07:49 +0200, I myself wrote:
> Ralph,
>
> On Wednesday, 2021-05-19 18:21:57 -0700, you wrote:
>
> > ...
> > On 2021-05-19 8:46 a.m., Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
> > > ...
> > > - The PNG file from the fla
Thierry,
On Monday, 2021-08-02 13:09:34 +0200, you wrote:
> ...
> The current version of scangearmp2 is 4.10 (
> https://canoncanadafr.custhelp.com/app/answers/answer_view/a_id/1034243/~/scangear-mp-v.-4.10-for-linux-%28debian-packagearchive%29).
> You can install libmfo2-canon (https://github.c
Thierry,
On Tuesday, 2021-08-10 14:28:29 +0200, you wrote:
> ...
> I just saw that things have changed.
> The current version of scangearmp2 is 4.20
> So I repackaged it to reflect this, you can use scangearmp2 provided by
> canon:
> https://canoncanadafr.custhelp.com/app/answers/answer_view/a_i
38 matches
Mail list logo