Sylvain Beucler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
We do not, at Savannah, know if a package should be GNU or not.
When a packages wants to be GNU, we first review it for non-GNU
hosting, then we point the user to
http://www.gnu.org/help/evaluation.html .
Then the GNU Evaluation team, and
Hi,
We do not, at Savannah, know if a package should be GNU or not.
When a packages wants to be GNU, we first review it for non-GNU
hosting, then we point the user to
http://www.gnu.org/help/evaluation.html .
Then the GNU Evaluation team, and eventually RMS, decide if and how
the package can be
Hi Gaius,
Lots of complications here.
First, as Sylvain hypothesized, it's not necessary that every dependency
of a GNU project be GNU. So you can use p2c in modula2 and modula2 can
still potentially be dubbed GNU. That's fine.
Second, if you are essentially maintaining p2c now, and want it
Hello,
We recently received the mail below at [EMAIL PROTECTED]. It more
concerns GNU policy than actual license questions, though, so I
thought it would be best to pass it on to you.
Do you think you might be able to provide a reply? If not, let me
know, and I'll see who else I should try to
