[Savannah-register-public] [task #14517] Submission of Debbugs for GNU

Update of task #14517 (project administration): Status: In Progress => Cancelled Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #10:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14517] Submission of Debbugs for GNU

Follow-up Comment #9, task #14517 (project administration): Agreed; if there are no other comments, I'll cancel this submission. ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14517] Submission of Debbugs for GNU

Follow-up Comment #8, task #14517 (project administration): This is sad: code for this service that runs on gnu.org will have to be hosted elsewhere... Savannah is not serving GNU here. :-/ ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14517] Submission of Debbugs for GNU

Follow-up Comment #7, task #14517 (project administration): If the package is to be registered on Savannah, it should follow Savannah's policies. I think the (1) calls for fixing it in the first place, no matter if it's registered as a Savannah group.

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14517] Submission of Debbugs for GNU

Follow-up Comment #6, task #14517 (project administration): Sorry, this discussion stalled. To me the reasons to add Debbugs to Savannah would be that (1) this code is already running on bugs.gnu.org, (2) it doesn't follow best practices but has a clear contribution record within Debian. How

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14517] Submission of Debbugs for GNU

Follow-up Comment #5, task #14517 (project administration): Thank you, you were right, I hadn't read that discussion carefully; now I have, but it still isn't clear for me why this package should be exempt from Savannah policy. ___ Reply

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14517] Submission of Debbugs for GNU

Follow-up Comment #4, task #14517 (project administration): Please take a look at the discussion I referred to. Essentially, the code is already running at bugs.gnu.org. This request of mine is an attempt to "salvage" it. It would be ideal to submit the changes to Debbugs, but nobody has

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14517] Submission of Debbugs for GNU

Follow-up Comment #3, task #14517 (project administration): I don't believe omitting the review of notices is up to Savannah admins; you could ask licens...@fsf.org if you think you can convince them (it may take much longer time to wait a response from them than to fix the code). WRT diverging

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14517] Submission of Debbugs for GNU

Update of task #14517 (project administration): Status:None => In Progress Assigned to:None => ineiev ___ Follow-up Comment #1: Hello,

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14517] Submission of Debbugs for GNU

URL: Summary: Submission of Debbugs for GNU Project: Savannah Administration Submitted by: civodul Submitted on: Mon 22 May 2017 10:43:17 AM CEST Should Start On: Mon 22 May 2017 12:00:00 AM