[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Update of task #14578 (project administration): Status: In Progress => Cancelled Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #78: I'm

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #76, task #14578 (project administration): Hello, Nicolas! In doc/html/jquery.js, copyright and license notices aren't specific enough, e.g. Copyright (c) 2009 AUTHORS.txt (http://jqueryui.com/about) One shouldn't rely on URLs, the texts they contain may change (and the

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #75, task #14578 (project administration): I' ve double-checked all files under doc subdirs. I' ve distinguished two cases: files embedded by Doxygen and files generated by Doxygen. The copyright notice of such files is now relative to this distinction. I suppose its now more

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #74, task #14578 (project administration): This file is automatically generated by doxygen. Maybe I've badly understood doxygen license. I have understood that doxygen license does not apply on generated files, instead, the right license that applies on generated file is the

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #73, task #14578 (project administration): I've just looked into doc/html/resize.js. It doesn't seem to include anything specific to your package. May you really claim your copyright for it? ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #72, task #14578 (project administration): First, I' ve obvsiously fixed the wrong licence added in the doc/html/jquery.js. Second, I' ve worked for making generation of doc/html, doc/man3 and doc/latex decorelated. This allow me to specialize them in an easiest way than before.

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #71, task #14578 (project administration): Documentation should be released in GFDLv1.3+-compatible way. Some notices don't seem valid: for example, Dimitri van Heesh has nothing to do with doc/html/jquery.js; also, the notice like "documents produced by doxygen... are not

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #70, task #14578 (project administration): Well, I'm not pardonable: I have totally forgotten to do the same job (than for js and html) for css files... :( I'm sorry, its now fixed in the last archive. I have also replaced the original GDSL licence notice by doxygen one in the

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #69, task #14578 (project administration): I think yes, I did take time to see the latest archive. I've just downloaded http://ndarnis.free.fr/gdsl/gdsl-1.8.tar.gz and unpacked it; gdsl-1.8/doc/html/navtree.css has no notices.

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #68, task #14578 (project administration): Did you take time to see in the latest gdsl archive that every file (including .js, .css, .html) is now embedding notice as Savannah policies expect? I guess everything is fine now, and I think nothing was forgotten this time...

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #67, task #14578 (project administration): It looks like your code sometimes adds invalid notices, e.g. it may say that a third-party file is copyrighted by you. Some files still have no notices. I've just noticed another issue: Savannah requires that the hosted packages

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #66, task #14578 (project administration): I've added code to add copyright notice to the header of all doc/html and doc/js files after doxygen generation. So its now easy for me to maintain them because I ve got no over work to do each time. New archive is available as usual.

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #65, task #14578 (project administration): > I know JavaScript allow comments, but Doxygen don't allow to overwrite these autogenerated files, so I must left the js filenames in the html/README to make them covered I think if your package must be released in a way that doesn't

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #64, task #14578 (project administration): I've read the links you sent but its not enough clear to me :-( so: - as I said in my previous post, I' ve already removed html filenames from the html/README as you ask me to do, because HTML allow comments and the copyright notice is

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #63, task #14578 (project administration): Did you read the document ValidNotices links to, http://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/Legal-Matters.html ? It doesn't distinguish formats that are raw-readable and readable

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #62, task #14578 (project administration): You told me on the 02-13 that HTML files names should'nt be listed in README. OK, I've now removed them. I' ve just tried to explain that I've choosen to list them in the README file because of their "non-humanily-readable state". I

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #61, task #14578 (project administration): Hello, Nicolas! > ...As the copyright notice is less readable in raw man3 files under man3/ dir... I'm not sure what you mean. I believe it's readable. What about the main point, HTML and JavaScript files having no notices in them?

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #60, task #14578 (project administration): I've intentionnaly left all html files names in the README in html/ subdir (as for .3 files under man3 dir), because I thought the notice was not intended to be read without interpretating html files (resp. man3 files). So, as you

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #58, task #14578 (project administration): Well, I'm totally confused... The uploaded file was not the good one 8-( (easy visible because I made a big change in man pages generated by doxygen to avoid lack of copyright in some separated files). I've just re-generated a good

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #57, task #14578 (project administration): Yet when I less `find . -type f`, the thirty first file it opens is ./doc/man3/gdsl_hash.h.3 which lacks those notices :( ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #56, task #14578 (project administration): I wish you a happy new year. I 've took the time to check every file in every dir. I sincerely think that I have not forgotten any file (in particular every html file has got now a notice). You could take the archive at the usual place:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #55, task #14578 (project administration): That's good (I assume that the rules are quite clear); but then, it's a responsibility of package maintainers rather than Savannah admins to make sure that the rules are enforced. In particular, you should check whether every file has

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #54, task #14578 (project administration): There is no discussion about your personal opinion. I understand clearly the need to respect savannah rules. So I'm answering YES: I'm agree with the rules you' re speaking about.

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #53, task #14578 (project administration): I'd like to clarify two things. > I hope it's OK now, just tell me if you find another thing to do... Roughly speaking, one may get an impression that we are discussing package compliance against my personal opinion about Savannah

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #52, task #14578 (project administration): OK, so I have successfully added an html comment with copyright notice in all doxygen generated files (with HTML_HEADER). So, even toc files (like examples.html, modules.html or files.html) on which I can't decide their content, does

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #51, task #14578 (project administration): Writing the notices in HTML comments is acceptable, making them visitor-visible is preferable. ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #50, task #14578 (project administration): Do you think it's ok if the copyright notice in html files is written in html comments only (between tags)? So, the notices will not be displayed within an html interpreter as a navigator (excepted for the main html page for example),

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #49, task #14578 (project administration): Yes, I' ve already tried it, but without success. When I ve some time, I'll try to go further in this direction, maybe I 've not tried all possibilities with this setting... ___

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #48, task #14578 (project administration): Did you try to define HTML_FOOTER ? ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #47, task #14578 (project administration): Yes, its only a toc file generated by doxygen... Unfortunately, its seems to be not possible to modify its generation... ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #46, task #14578 (project administration): doc/html/examples.html doesn't include the notices. I expect that it will. ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #45, task #14578 (project administration): In the last tgz I uploaded yesterday night, the HTML files does include copyright notices... It was not the case in all other archives before. I found the way, by using good doxygen tags and by using some tricks (as modifying the

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #44, task #14578 (project administration): I see no fundamental reason why HTML files can't be generated with the notices included. Texinfo does include them in its output. ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #43, task #14578 (project administration): I dont understand the goal of you last post. You're right, but as I said, all html/ and man3/ files are generated by Doxygen, and I don't want to have to modify them once they' ve been generated... Its a lack of time and a huge and

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #41, task #14578 (project administration): I did it. I think everything should at least be fine now (also copyright notices in examples files)! You could check the new archive: http://ndarnis.free.fr/gdsl/gdsl-1.8.tar.gz Thanks.

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #40, task #14578 (project administration): I think it would be better if the list were included in README. Is it really hard to keep the list of files there? ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #39, task #14578 (project administration): OK, thank you for reading. I have made some minor changes in it (see the link http://ndarnis.free.fr/README). Of course, the file I spoke in README file 'FILES.txt' contains the list of doxygen-(covered|generated) files. It' s easier

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #38, task #14578 (project administration): Yes, I think it looks good. ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message sent via/by Savannah

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #37, task #14578 (project administration): Could you check the doc/html/README file here please: http://ndarnis.free.fr/README? Tell me if its look good to you. Thanks. ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #36, task #14578 (project administration): > you said "copyright lines are OK" (in the doc/html/README), so > I conclude that I should left the new paragraph I suggested to add > (concerning doxygen licences and output-generated files too). > Is that right? Not licenses. I

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #35, task #14578 (project administration): Yes, but only your first answer that is made of two points: - first point: you said "copyright lines are OK" (in the doc/html/README), so I conclude that I should left the new paragraph I suggested to add (concerning doxygen licences

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #34, task #14578 (project administration): Is anything still unclear? ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message sent via/by Savannah

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #33, task #14578 (project administration): > Do you mean adding the lines I suggested in the doc/html/README could be enough ? I mean that the copyright lines are OK, but for the license notice it would be better if you used the text that you use in your source files. > For

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #32, task #14578 (project administration): Thanks for your help, but its not enough clear for me (I'm sorry, but english is not my native language, and my level is limited). Do you mean adding the lines I suggested in the doc/html/README could be enough ? For the copyright and

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #31, task #14578 (project administration): The copyright lines seem good; since Doxygen doesn't specify the version of the GPL, I think you may use the GPLv3+, and add the same license notice you use for your package. It's still would be desirable to have copyright and license

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #30, task #14578 (project administration): You're perfectly right, that is not the question. I took a look in doxygen doc and its stated that "Documents produced by doxygen are derivative works derived from the input used in their production; they are not affected by [doxygen

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #29, task #14578 (project administration): > All doc/html (png, js, css) files are generated by doxygen. What should I do for their copyright notice? I believe that you, as an author of a free package, are responsible for making sure it's free. If you put anything to your

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #28, task #14578 (project administration): All doc/html (png, js, css) files are generated by doxygen. What should I do for their copyright notice? A note for each of them in the README file is it sufficient? And, in this case, what kind of note? Should I just write its

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #27, task #14578 (project administration): I'm afraid they don't follow our recommendations quite strictly. All copyrightable files should have licensing notices; PNG files in doc/html/ have none. Did you check _all_ your files? This is what you should have done to make sure

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #26, task #14578 (project administration): The doc/latex/README and doc/html/README files has been fixed to respect your recommandations. Please, take the new archive as usual: http://ndarnis.free.fr/gdsl/gdsl-1.8.tar.gz

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #25, task #14578 (project administration): Could you check files in doc/html/? README says they are all copyrighted by Nicolas Darnis, does that include doxygen.png? ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #24, task #14578 (project administration): You can get the right file here: http://ndarnis.free.fr/gdsl/gdsl-1.8.tar.gz It seems that the savannah upload file mechanism could not work well in case of same file name between the current and the previous. That could explain a lot

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #23, task #14578 (project administration): The attachment systems seems to be not working very well... So, I'll post my archive on an http link (today if I can), and I'll send you the link when done (same link than before, but with the updated tgz file). Thanks.

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #22, task #14578 (project administration): Pardon? ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message sent via/by Savannah

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #21, task #14578 (project administration): Oups... All Makefile.am fixed. ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message sent via/by Savannah

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #20, task #14578 (project administration): Thank you; please check other files as well: for example, doc/man3/Makefile.am lacks copyright and license notices. ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #19, task #14578 (project administration): In case of upload failure, here is a good link: http://ndarnis.free.fr/gdsl/gdsl-1.8.tar.gz ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #18, task #14578 (project administration): New try of uploading gdsl-1.8.tgz (2 120 731 bytes)... ___ Reply to this item at: ___

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #17, task #14578 (project administration): Works for me; you could upload your file somewhere else and put a link here. ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Additional Item Attachment, task #14578 (project administration): File name: gdsl-1.8.tar.gzSize:2011 KB ___ Reply to this item at: ___

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #16, task #14578 (project administration): I don't understand what's going wrong with the upload... I did exactly the same as usual. When my post is validated, savannah web site tells everything its ok. I will try again in a couple of days and I'll post a screen-capture thats

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #15, task #14578 (project administration): No joy. ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message sent via/by Savannah

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #14, task #14578 (project administration): New try... ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message sent via/by Savannah

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #13, task #14578 (project administration): The archive didn't attach. ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message sent via/by Savannah

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #12, task #14578 (project administration): I've found how to make doxygen generating copyright notice for files themselves. I've modified all my src/ header files accordingly and build the new archive joined to this post. Hope its ok now...

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #11, task #14578 (project administration): Notices in doc/man3/gdsl_hash.3 doc/man3/gdsl_stack.3 are fine, but files like doc/man3/gdsl_hash.h.3 and doc/man3/_gdsl_bintree.h.3 still have no notices. ___ Reply to this item

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #10, task #14578 (project administration): As gdsl manpages and html doc are automatically generated by doxygen, it was not very easy for me to find how to add a copyright section... I think I have found a not-so-bad compromise. Just tell me if ok or not. Thank you very much.

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #9, task #14578 (project administration): Oh, real GNU rules are much more extensive, they include following GNU coding standards, for instance. Now, the format of man pages allows copyright and license notices (see e.g. man less or man gawk), putting them in doc/man3/README

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #8, task #14578 (project administration): I think there is no more file like this. It was coming from another package from which I copied it, and my script added the Copyright header... So I replaced the INSTALL file by one that should be alright (I've not found the autoconf

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #7, task #14578 (project administration): Thank you! Are you sure INSTALL is copyrighted by Nicolas Darnis? It's very similar to INSTALL coming with autoconf, but that file says it's copyrighted by the FSF. Are there other such files in your tarball?

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #6, task #14578 (project administration): Here is attached the right tarball with its signature... (file #41817, file #41818) ___ Additional Item Attachment: File name: gdsl-1.8.tar.gzSize:1917 KB File

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #5, task #14578 (project administration): Thank you! All copyrightable files in your distribution should have valid copyright and license notices; many files in doc/html have not (if some files have a format that practically doesn't allow comments, the notices for those files

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #4, task #14578 (project administration): As requested by Ineiev, here is the asked tarball... Thank you. (file #41769) ___ Additional Item Attachment: File name: gdsl-1.8.tar.gzSize:1942 KB

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Update of task #14578 (project administration): Status: Cancelled => In Progress Open/Closed: Closed => Open ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #3, task #14578 (project administration): No response; cancelling. ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message sent via/by Savannah

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Update of task #14578 (project administration): Status: In Progress => Cancelled Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #2, task #14578 (project administration): If there is no further interest, I'll cancel this submission. ___ Reply to this item at: ___

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Update of task #14578 (project administration): Status:None => In Progress Assigned to:None => ineiev ___ Reply to this item at:

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

Follow-up Comment #1, task #14578 (project administration): Hello, Nicolas! All non-trivial files in your distribution should have valid copyright and license notices . In your tarball, ChangeLog INSTALL Makefile.am NEWS THANKS TODO

[Savannah-register-public] [task #14578] Submission of Generic Data Structures Library

URL: Summary: Submission of Generic Data Structures Library Project: Savannah Administration Submitted by: ndarnis Submitted on: Mon 03 Jul 2017 03:32:20 PM CEST Should Start On: Mon 03 Jul