On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Robert McAuley wrote:
> Unless I'm wrong, reversing the behaviour would mean that I would have
> to rely on my program to time things correctly, and just hope that
> whatever it assumes is the correct time is how long it takes
> LiquidSoap to play it. I'd rather h
Unless I'm wrong, reversing the behaviour would mean that I would have
to rely on my program to time things correctly, and just hope that
whatever it assumes is the correct time is how long it takes
LiquidSoap to play it. I'd rather have LiquidSoap handle the timing
issues (just a safer bet) and h
Le Tuesday 14 April 2009 15:18:05 Robert McAuley, vous avez écrit :
> Unless I'm wrong, reversing the behaviour would mean that I would have
> to rely on my program to time things correctly, and just hope that
> whatever it assumes is the correct time is how long it takes
> LiquidSoap to play it.
Le Wednesday 08 April 2009 20:44:41 Robert McAuley, vous avez écrit :
> Hello all,
Hi !
> I run a radio station where users request and then vote for what song
> they want to hear next. The "voting" part is critical - each song is
> run through an election, and then that song is played i
Hello all,
I run a radio station where users request and then vote for what song
they want to hear next. The "voting" part is critical - each song is
run through an election, and then that song is played immediately as
the next song. The process is controlled via an executable program,
and I hav
