Re: [sbopkg-users] sbopkg issues

2020-05-21 Thread Rich Shepard
On Thu, 21 May 2020, B Watson wrote: If the script maintainer applied a patch that fixes a security vulnerability, for instance. Or just a bugfix for a bug that you don't happen to have bitten by yet. B. This makes sense. My experiences have been that such adjustments by the application devel

Re: [sbopkg-users] sbopkg issues

2020-05-21 Thread B Watson
On 5/21/20, Rich Shepard wrote: > A build number change for the same application version is not important to > me. It depends on why the build number changed. If the script maintainer applied a patch that fixes a security vulnerability, for instance. Or just a bugfix for a bug that you don't ha

Re: [sbopkg-users] sbopkg issues

2020-05-21 Thread Rich Shepard
On Thu, 21 May 2020, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote: Oh, i misunderstand your questions Rich i thought it was dealing with queue files (generated by sqg), but instead you mean as build queue (which is standard operation by sbopkg). Sorry for that. Willy, E-mail communications are easier to mis-

Re: [sbopkg-users] sbopkg issues

2020-05-20 Thread Willy Sudiarto Raharjo
> I ran 'sqg -a', went grocery shopping, and eventually it finished all 3726 > package. When I open the sbopkg display and select View for the queue it > tells me the queue is empty. > > Should I add all installed packages to the queue? I thought that the > queue represents installed packages for

Re: [sbopkg-users] sbopkg issues

2020-05-20 Thread Rich Shepard
On Wed, 20 May 2020, KRT wrote: I joined the list to chime in, I hope you don't mind my $0.02. KRT, Nah, all contributions are welcome. sqg -a populates the queue directory so that now each package with hard dependencies has a queue file listing these, that's all I use it for. Thanks

Re: [sbopkg-users] sbopkg issues

2020-05-20 Thread KRT
Howdy, I joined the list to chime in, I hope you don't mind my $0.02. sqg -a populates the queue directory so that now each package with hard dependencies has a queue file listing these, that's all I use it for. Regarding the gnucash situation, it was recently patched without a change

Re: [sbopkg-users] sbopkg issues

2020-05-20 Thread Rich Shepard
On Thu, 21 May 2020, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote: try to regenerate the queue files again first using sqg I ran 'sqg -a', went grocery shopping, and eventually it finished all 3726 package. When I open the sbopkg display and select View for the queue it tells me the queue is empty. Should I

Re: [sbopkg-users] sbopkg issues

2020-05-20 Thread Rich Shepard
On Thu, 21 May 2020, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote: try to regenerate the queue files again first using sqg In progress using sqg -a Rich ___ sbopkg-users mailing list sbopkg-users@sbopkg.org https://sbopkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sbopkg-users

Re: [sbopkg-users] sbopkg issues

2020-05-20 Thread Willy Sudiarto Raharjo
>> Please check your queue file for that package >> perhaps it was an old queue file that hasn't been updated after some >> changes in the repository >> you can simply regenerate the queue file using sqg -p > > Willy, > > Queue file is empty. I also took the opportunity to clean out obsolete > s

Re: [sbopkg-users] sbopkg issues

2020-05-20 Thread Rich Shepard
On Thu, 21 May 2020, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote: Please check your queue file for that package perhaps it was an old queue file that hasn't been updated after some changes in the repository you can simply regenerate the queue file using sqg -p Willy, Queue file is empty. I also took the op

Re: [sbopkg-users] sbopkg issues

2020-05-20 Thread Willy Sudiarto Raharjo
> I want to learn why when sbopkg builds a file of upgrades it keep listing > python3-PyQt5 when the installed version is the current one which to it > wants to upgrade. And today, it did the same thing with gnucash-3.10 which > I've had installed and running. Please check your queue file for that