Re: successful 7.3 update through yumex

On 26/01/17 20:42, Maarten wrote: Great, didn't know that about rpmfusion now doing el7. Anyone know if nux-desktop repo and rpmfusion can be mixed together? It's not mentioned on their FAQ. Quote from the announcement on the rpmfusion list - I forget how to get a link: "While bootstrapping

Re: successful 7.3 update through yumex

Great, didn't know that about rpmfusion now doing el7. Anyone know if nux-desktop repo and rpmfusion can be mixed together? It's not mentioned on their FAQ. On 2017-01-26 21:32, John Pilkington wrote: On 26/01/17 20:02, Yasha Karant wrote: Yesterday afternoon, I did a successful update

Re: successful 7.3 update through yumex

On 26/01/17 20:02, Yasha Karant wrote: Yesterday afternoon, I did a successful update from production 7.2 to production 7.3 through yumex. In addition to the SL production repositories, I use the epel, elrepo, and google-chrome repositories for specific add-ons, including nvidia support. I

Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] update notice?

You sent the email and it arrived at the mailinglist: From: Pat Riehecky Subject: Scientific Linux 7.3 x86_64 is officially released To: Message-ID: Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 14:21:28

successful 7.3 update through yumex

Yesterday afternoon, I did a successful update from production 7.2 to production 7.3 through yumex. In addition to the SL production repositories, I use the epel, elrepo, and google-chrome repositories for specific add-ons, including nvidia support. I only use kernels from SL. Although the

Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] update notice?

Yes, that seemed to fix it... Not sure what the new messages about the kernel are that I now see on "check-update" but not on "update"... Gilbert [root@localhost ~]# yum --enablerepo=* clean expire-cache Loaded plugins: langpacks Cleaning repos: epel epel-debuginfo epel-source epel-testing

Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] update notice?

lsb_release comes out of redhat-lsb-core . Description : The Linux Standard Base (LSB) Core module support provides the : fundamental system interfaces, libraries, and runtime environment : upon which all conforming applications and libraries depend. Personally, I put

Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] update notice?

On Jan 26, 2017, at 17:17 , Pat Riehecky wrote: > On 01/26/2017 10:15 AM, Stephan Wiesand wrote: >> On Jan 26, 2017, at 16:32 , Maarten wrote: >> >>> And great work for releasing 7.3!! :) >> Has it actually been released? Can't find an announcement to that effect... > > It is out officially,

Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] update notice?

Can I have you send me the output of the following: yum --enablerepo=* clean expire-cache yum repolist lsb_release -a cat /etc/yum/vars/slreleasever yum makecache find /var/cache/yum/x86_64/ -type f -name repomd.xml -ls -exec sha1sum {} \; Pat On 01/26/2017 10:06 AM, Gilbert E. Detillieux

Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] update notice?

On 01/26/2017 10:15 AM, Stephan Wiesand wrote: On Jan 26, 2017, at 16:32 , Maarten wrote: And great work for releasing 7.3!! :) Has it actually been released? Can't find an announcement to that effect... It is out officially, I'll see if the email went missing somewhere. Pat

Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] update notice?

On Jan 26, 2017, at 16:32 , Maarten wrote: > And great work for releasing 7.3!! :) Has it actually been released? Can't find an announcement to that effect...

Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] update notice?

Pat, I'm seeing these same errors, even after a "yum clean all". This is just since yesterday's upgrade from SL 7.2 to 7.3, on many boxes. Gilbert On 26/01/2017 8:39 AM, Pat Riehecky wrote: Hello, Can I have you run a yum clean all and see if the problem persists? Pat On 01/26/2017

Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] update notice?

Hello Pat, Shortly after I sent that mail I thought why not try that first. That worked, thanks! And great work for releasing 7.3!! :) Maarten On 2017-01-26 15:39, Pat Riehecky wrote: Hello, Can I have you run a yum clean all and see if the problem persists? Pat On 01/26/2017 01:12

Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] update notice?

Hello, Can I have you run a yum clean all and see if the problem persists? Pat On 01/26/2017 01:12 AM, Maarten wrote: What do these messages mean? It says to contact the repo owner? etc/cron.daily/0yum-daily.cron: Not using downloaded repomd.xml because it is older than what we have:

Re: Aliases in /etc/profile.d not read for one user in graphical mode

Dear Shane, Thanks for your suggestion, it makes sense. I maybe need to explore it a bit further, but so far I’ve not had much success. Trying this in the shell where these aliases did not work: $ shopt | grep aliases expand_aliases on On top of that, aliases that are defined in ~/.bashrc

Re: Aliases in /etc/profile.d not read for one user in graphical mode

Dear Lionel, I have aliases defined in .sh files in my /etc/profile.d/ folder. When I log in on my computer directly in either KDE or Gnome, in any terminal (I tried Konsole, x-term and a few others), these aliases are not working (not set, I assume). Other commands in the same .sh files

Aliases in /etc/profile.d not read for one user in graphical mode

Dear SL users, I have a strange error and don’t know where to start looking. Google didn’t help this time. It seems to be distro-specific so I try to get help here. I’m running sl7.2, patched, updated, etc. with the latest kernel: $ uname -a Linux 3.10.0-514.6.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Jan