(shaking off grand mal seizure resulting from that last...)
Now, more than ever, I will NOT be seeing this movie. WHY would they let these
guys give an interview? Reads as though they just learned English in places.
I'll grant Orci the Star Wars analogy, but not the Trek one. Trek's never been
Keith, I stood in Target, with the DVD in hand, for half an hour before passing
on it in favor of At World's End. After seeing the movie, I think made an
error in judgment. I hope tonight doesn't prove me right, or I'll REALLY have a
bad weekend...
-[ Received Mail Content
We can only hope there will be, my friend.
-[ Received Mail Content ]--
Subject : Re: [RE][scifinoir2] Hulu--Who Knew?
Date : Fri, 27 Mar 2009 01:49:34 + (UTC)
From : Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.net
To : scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Aargh! And now they're
Keith, I predict that The Movie-Goer's Perfect Revenge will occur with this
one. The first wave of people who flock to see this will come out, spewing
venom to all and sundry about how BAD it is, and tank it that day. I don't give
it three weeks in release.
-[ Received Mail Content
ahar...@earthlink.net
Having seen literaly everything Pixar has ever done and loved it all, this
one ought to be another winner!
My pick is Pixar!
Cheers!
Amy
Wouldn't that be a step, indeed?
I am *really* going to try to get past my fears and get out to see this
Yes, Keith, Yahu News had a story posted about him yesterday, talking about his
comics collection, the comic that he and his son Weston co-wrote, and the fact
that he named his latest child Kal-El.
-[ Received Mail Content ]--
Subject : [scifinoir2] Nicolas Cage's rare
It will do slightly better than the last Streetfighter abomination but
definitely won't have any legs.
Keith,
Japanese self image is very different than how we view them. The large eyes is
a technique that the old school animation pioneers learned from Disney and it
is pretty ingrained in the
http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/news/serinda-swan-tron-20-to-include-sexy-digital-temptresses.php
I think this might be good. With all the special effects we have these
days they should be able to do a lot.
--
Check out my Ebook
The GreasyGuide to Marketing your iPhone App
Only .99 Cents
What a coincidence! I saw Swan last night, playing Zatanna on Smallville, and
was impressed at how she filled out the black stockings. Looking at her, I
thought now here's a lady who could play Wonder Woman if that's the age (23)
and look they're going for! Unlike Megan Fox, Swan isn't very
Yeah, it boils down to a philosophy: keep Trek the way it was to appeal to old
fans, or update it to appeal to the Star Wars crowd. Of course, I have to ask,
is it safe to assume that *no* younger people can appreciate Trek? Are they
saying that only action and big battles in scifi will get
Ha-ha! What's At World's End?
- Original Message -
From: Martin Baxter truthseeker...@lycos.com
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 7:35:41 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [RE][scifinoir2] Stargate SG-1 Finale Movie on Tonight
Keith, I
There was a Eureka marathon on all day Wednesday, which allowed me to get
caught up. Still, I keep missing the show where Richardson's fiance
disappeared. What happened?
Warehouse 13?
- Original Message -
From: Martin Baxter truthseeker...@lycos.com
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Agreed. After all, how long did the Kristin Kreuk Streetfighter vehicle stay
at the multiplex?
- Original Message -
From: Martin Baxter truthseeker...@lycos.com
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 7:56:47 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject:
Keith, in the ep where Stark and Allison were to get married (the aptly-named
From Hell To Eternity), GD acquired a new quantum clock that would set a new
time standard across the globe, but it had a problem (what else is new?), and
it was causing the day to replay over and over, with Carter
If memory serves, it left Stonecrest the week after it came out. Mind you, I
haven't been in that direction since, so they may have put it back into play.
-[ Received Mail Content ]--
Subject : Re: [RE][scifinoir2] WTF? A Dragonball Movie??
Date : Fri, 27 Mar 2009
The last Pirates of the Caribbean movie.
-[ Received Mail Content ]--
Subject : Re: [RE][scifinoir2] Stargate SG-1 Finale Movie on Tonight
Date : Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:45:28 + (UTC)
From : Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.net
To : scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
(standing ovation)
And have you flinched through the trailer for the latest Statham offering, BTB?
If not... thank Deity for the grace.
-[ Received Mail Content ]--
Subject : Re: [RE][scifinoir2] Just for Martin: An Interview with Star Trek
Writers
Date : Fri, 27 Mar
got it
- Original Message -
From: Martin Baxter truthseeker...@lycos.com
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 2:05:39 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [RE][scifinoir2] Stargate SG-1 Finale Movie on Tonight
The last Pirates of the
If you mean the inexplicable sequel to Crank, where Statham somehow survived
a fall from an airplane, a heart that would stop beating if not stimulated? You
mean the sequel where in apparently a couple of hours, Statham's given an
artificial heart, which he must keep charged by grabbing every
keith, i saw the trailer, but i see that cch pounder is delegated 2 a support
role. she is too good of an actress 2 be back up 2 no names! so, this is one
that i believe i will skip. still waiting on someone in the group 2 talk me
back from not going 2 hulu and watching dollhouse. i keep
It appears to me that if they wanted to make Star Trek more in the lines of
Star Wars then perhaps they should have done a remake of Star Wars instead and
just let Star Trek die a slow death. I mean I love Star Trek, I love all of the
series. But the thing is that in order to draw in the new
Oh, too bad. I've only seen one ep of Dollhouse so far--the premiere. I just
keep forgetting about it for some reason, though the gang says it's getting
good. Curiously, though, when SciFi ran a Tru Calling marathon this week, I
watched every ep time and chores permitted
- Original
Agreed! I think what they miss is that what makes Trek is, as you say, Trek.
It's the people, the relationships, and the plots that make it good. It's how
some of my fav eps have little straight out scifi action. It's why shows and
movies that are really heavy on action and FX can actually
Kinda scary that the more biased, partisan news--liberal or conservative--does
better than CNN. Of course, I agree with the MSNBC guy who says CNN ain't what
it used to be. I think they walking the line between trying to be real news,
and entertainment news. I've pretty much stopped watching
I can't speak for America, but with the exception of occasionally watching
AC360, I don't watch CNN. They come across as wimpy, and water down everything.
They had their chance to be unbiased during the Bush years, and turned into his
little lapdogs, and so they lost credibility. They were just
I disagree with you about them not being partisan -at least during elections.
Sometimes it was so obvious during the primary that I had to turn the
channel. They just do not use it as part of their marketing.I think they
are number three for a reason. I liked them better when they
I was thinking the same think about the Bush years. They were practically
cheerleaders for Bush, his wars and George Orwell policies. They helped to
take Kerry out
From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of L Freeman
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 8:44
I meant that MSNBC and Fox are more overtly, loudly, and intentionally
partisan, without even trying to claim they're not--despite O'Reilly's Fair
and Balanced crap. But I agree with you overall, CNN is partisan, they just
market themselves that way. Like I said about the Ed Henry why did you
Aside from a special few like McClatchy News, Democracy Now!, Pacifica Radio,
and firebrands like Tavis Smiley and Phil Donahue, I think the bulk of the
media was criminally culpable during the Bush years. Those who didn't outright
cheerlead for Bush abandoned their duties by not questioning
Question. You say that David Gregory slants Meet The Press toward the
Republican side. Why do you think that? I'm not disagreeing: his questions have
irritated me since he took over. There's a fine line between being between hard
hitting and just attacking, and I feel he crosses it, especially
I like McClatchy. It’s all about the corporation. All the same people are on
the same boards. You don’t like the news, call your buddy on the board.
From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Keith Johnson
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 10:01 PM
To:
I agree about Brokaw, but I never noticed it before he retired and them came
back as a temporary stand-in for Russert.
I don’t watch meet the press anymore, but Gregory’s bias toward Republicans and
at one time I thought his cheerleading for Bush was common knowledge. I used
to think it was
32 matches
Mail list logo
