✋
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Juan Nunez-Iglesias
wrote:
>
> On 27 Nov 2017, 4:48 PM +1100, Stefan van der Walt ,
> wrote:
>
>
> Who will volunteer to set it up?
>
>
> (apprehensively…) ✋
>
> ___
> scikit-image mailing list
> scikit-image@python.o
On 27 Nov 2017, 4:48 PM +1100, Stefan van der Walt ,
wrote:
>
> Who will volunteer to set it up?
(apprehensively…) ✋
___
scikit-image mailing list
scikit-image@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image
On Sat, Nov 25, 2017, at 15:55, Juan Nunez-Iglesias wrote:
> For this, we need a dedicated machine to run benchmarks. Stéfan, do
> you think you could make/host one at BIDS?
Yes, I can probably make available a machine for this purpose. Who will
volunteer to set it up?
Stéfan
Hi Sourav,
Yes, improving performance is something that’s in the roadmap (this roadmap
exists only in the heads of several core developers — something else that needs
to be rectified). It just hasn’t been emphasised for lack of developer time.
A very specific goal that I’ve had for a while is t
Hello,
I am writing the mail with reference to the tweet made by Jeremy Howard
here- https://twitter.com/jeremyphoward/status/931761385628778496
Here, he did an image rotation for all the existing image processing
libraries in Python and noted that vips is better than scipy in terms of
speed.
I
