Re: [scikit-image] 回复： Python 3 transition

[Stefan van der Walt]

Please continue any discussion of the issue on the original thread; I'll
respond there.
On Sun, Nov 12, 2017, at 06:05, Egor Panfilov wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I'd also support this decision.
> For information, here is an another link to a related discussion -
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/scikit-image/7aH6hshJJg0/ykjxdZ8uMQAJ
> .> 
> Juan,
> I don't think we're there yet for 1.0, though :). From my standpoint,
> several important aspects (metaparams handling, API, xy->rc, etc) have
> to be addressed first (see `discussion` tag on GitHub).> 
> Stefan,
> Has the schedule been changed? I remember we were planning to release
> 0.14 in November 2017 (see
> https://mail.python.org/pipermail/scikit-image/2017-September/005352.html).> 
> Regards,
> Egor Panfilov
> 
> 2017-11-12 2:55 GMT+03:00 Juan Nunez-Iglesias :
>> I agree. I would suggest backporting bugfixes to 0.14 for 2 years, or
>> not naming it LTS because 1y is not “long term” by most definitions.>> 
>> imho we should aim for 1.0 for this time next year and maybe *that*
>> can depend on Python >= 3.6. =)>> 
>> Juan.
>> 
>> On 11 Nov 2017, 6:52 PM +1100,imag...@sina.com, wrote:
>> 
>>> Just my own opinion. we can give up python2.x  -- YXDragon
>>> 
>>> - 原始邮件 -
>>>  发件人：Stefan van der Walt 
>>>  收件人：scikit-image@python.org
>>>  主题：[scikit-image] Python 3 transition
>>>  日期：2017年11月11日 14点34分
>>> 
>>> Hi, everyone
>>>  I'd like to make a 4th attempt to determine our transition
>>>  pathway to>>>  Python 3. The last thread is here:
>>> https://mail.python.org/pipermail/scikit-image/2017-July/005304.html>>>  I 
>>> would like to propose that the next version, 0.14 (scheduled for
>>>  March>>>  of next year), becomes the last targeted for Python 2. It will
>>>  also be>>>  an LTS (Long Time Support), which means we will backport 
>>> serious
>>>  fixes>>>  for a period of one year. 0.15 will then target Python >= 3.5 
>>> only>>>  (sorry, no f-strings yet!).
>>>  Let me know your thoughts.
>>>  Stéfan
>>>  ___
>>>  scikit-image mailing list
>>> scikit-image@python.org
>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image
>>> ___
>>>  scikit-image mailing list
>>> scikit-image@python.org
>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>>  scikit-image mailing list
>> scikit-image@python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image
>> 
> _
> scikit-image mailing list
> scikit-image@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image

___
scikit-image mailing list
scikit-image@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image

Re: [scikit-image] 回复： Python 3 transition

[Egor Panfilov]

Hi all,

I'd also support this decision.
For information, here is an another link to a related discussion -
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/scikit-image/7aH6hshJJg0/ykjxdZ8uMQAJ
.

Juan,
I don't think we're there yet for 1.0, though :). From my standpoint,
several important aspects (metaparams handling, API, xy->rc, etc) have to
be addressed first (see `discussion` tag on GitHub).

Stefan,
Has the schedule been changed? I remember we were planning to release 0.14
in November 2017 (see
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/scikit-image/2017-September/005352.html).

Regards,
Egor Panfilov

2017-11-12 2:55 GMT+03:00 Juan Nunez-Iglesias :

> I agree. I would suggest backporting bugfixes to 0.14 for 2 years, or not
> naming it LTS because 1y is not “long term” by most definitions.
>
> imho we should aim for 1.0 for this time next year and maybe *that* can
> depend on Python >= 3.6. =)
>
> Juan.
>
> On 11 Nov 2017, 6:52 PM +1100, imag...@sina.com, wrote:
>
> Just my own opinion. we can give up python2.x  -- YXDragon
> - 原始邮件 -
> 发件人：Stefan van der Walt 
> 收件人：scikit-image@python.org
> 主题：[scikit-image] Python 3 transition
> 日期：2017年11月11日 14点34分
>
> Hi, everyone
> I'd like to make a 4th attempt to determine our transition pathway to
> Python 3. The last thread is here:
> https://mail.python.org/pipermail/scikit-image/2017-July/005304.html
> I would like to propose that the next version, 0.14 (scheduled for March
> of next year), becomes the last targeted for Python 2. It will also be
> an LTS (Long Time Support), which means we will backport serious fixes
> for a period of one year. 0.15 will then target Python >= 3.5 only
> (sorry, no f-strings yet!).
> Let me know your thoughts.
> Stéfan
> ___
> scikit-image mailing list
> scikit-image@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image
> ___
> scikit-image mailing list
> scikit-image@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image
>
>
> ___
> scikit-image mailing list
> scikit-image@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image
>
>
___
scikit-image mailing list
scikit-image@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image

Re: [scikit-image] 回复： Python 3 transition

[Juan Nunez-Iglesias]

I agree. I would suggest backporting bugfixes to 0.14 for 2 years, or not 
naming it LTS because 1y is not “long term” by most definitions.

imho we should aim for 1.0 for this time next year and maybe *that* can depend 
on Python >= 3.6. =)

Juan.

On 11 Nov 2017, 6:52 PM +1100, imag...@sina.com, wrote:
> Just my own opinion. we can give up python2.x      -- YXDragon
> - 原始邮件 -
> 发件人：Stefan van der Walt 
> 收件人：scikit-image@python.org
> 主题：[scikit-image] Python 3 transition
> 日期：2017年11月11日 14点34分
>
> Hi, everyone
> I'd like to make a 4th attempt to determine our transition pathway to
> Python 3. The last thread is here:
> https://mail.python.org/pipermail/scikit-image/2017-July/005304.html
> I would like to propose that the next version, 0.14 (scheduled for March
> of next year), becomes the last targeted for Python 2. It will also be
> an LTS (Long Time Support), which means we will backport serious fixes
> for a period of one year. 0.15 will then target Python >= 3.5 only
> (sorry, no f-strings yet!).
> Let me know your thoughts.
> Stéfan
> ___
> scikit-image mailing list
> scikit-image@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image
> ___
> scikit-image mailing list
> scikit-image@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image
___
scikit-image mailing list
scikit-image@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image

[scikit-image] 回复： Python 3 transition

[imagepy]

Just my own opinion. we can give up python2.x  -- YXDragon
- 原始邮件 -
发件人：Stefan van der Walt 
收件人：scikit-image@python.org
主题：[scikit-image] Python 3 transition
日期：2017年11月11日 14点34分

Hi, everyone
I'd like to make a 4th attempt to determine our transition pathway to
Python 3.  The last thread is here:
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/scikit-image/2017-July/005304.html
I would like to propose that the next version, 0.14 (scheduled for March
of next year), becomes the last targeted for Python 2.  It will also be
an LTS (Long Time Support), which means we will backport serious fixes
for a period of one year.  0.15 will then target Python >= 3.5 only
(sorry, no f-strings yet!).
Let me know your thoughts.
Stéfan
___
scikit-image mailing list
scikit-image@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image
___
scikit-image mailing list
scikit-image@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image