Re: [scikit-learn] Next Sprint

On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 12:54:09PM -0500, Andreas Mueller wrote: > Do you or anyone in your team has cycles to do that? I asked Guillaume Lemaître to do it. He has started. Gaël > I certainly don't, but I could try to delegate (to the single person I > delegate everything to ;) > On 1/10/19 12:

Re: [scikit-learn] Next Sprint

Do you or anyone in your team has cycles to do that? I certainly don't, but I could try to delegate (to the single person I delegate everything to ;) On 1/10/19 12:36 PM, Gael Varoquaux wrote: On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 12:32:17PM -0500, Andreas Mueller wrote: Any sprint specific funding you're

Re: [scikit-learn] Next Sprint

On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 12:32:17PM -0500, Andreas Mueller wrote: > Any sprint specific funding you're thinking of? Google gave in the past, > right? I was thinking of PSF. Gaël ___ scikit-learn mailing list scikit-learn@python.org https://mail.python.o

Re: [scikit-learn] Next Sprint

On 1/10/19 10:34 AM, Gael Varoquaux wrote: On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 02:09:58PM -0500, Andreas Mueller wrote: Gaël, does the foundation have funds and do you want to use them? And/or do you/INRA have funds you want to use? Neither myself nor Inria has fund to use outside the foundation. The fou

Re: [scikit-learn] Next Sprint

ief and potential misspell. > > >   Original Message > > > From: scikit-learn@python.org > > > Sent: 22 December 2018 17:17 > > > To: scikit-learn@python.org > > > Reply to: rth.yurc...@pm.me; scikit-learn@python.org > > > Cc: rth.yurc...@pm.me &

Re: [scikit-learn] Next Sprint

e wrote: Works for me as well. Sent from my phone - sorry to be brief and potential misspell.   Original Message From: scikit-learn@python.org Sent: 22 December 2018 17:17 To: scikit-learn@python.org Reply to: rth.yurc...@pm.me; scikit-learn@python.org Cc: rth.yurc...@pm.me Subject: Re: [sciki

Re: [scikit-learn] Next Sprint

l. > Sent from my phone - sorry to be brief and potential misspell. > Original Message > From: scikit-learn@python.org > Sent: 22 December 2018 17:17 > To: scikit-learn@python.org > Reply to: rth.yurc...@pm.me; scikit-learn@python.org > Cc: rth.yurc...@pm.me > Subject:

Re: [scikit-learn] Next Sprint

my phone - sorry to be brief and potential misspell. >   Original Message   > From: scikit-learn@python.org > Sent: 22 December 2018 17:17 > To: scikit-learn@python.org > Reply to: rth.yurc...@pm.me; scikit-learn@python.org > Cc: rth.yurc...@pm.me > Subject: Re: [scikit-learn] Next Spr

Re: [scikit-learn] Next Sprint

Works for me as well. Sent from my phone - sorry to be brief and potential misspell.   Original Message   From: scikit-learn@python.org Sent: 22 December 2018 17:17 To: scikit-learn@python.org Reply to: rth.yurc...@pm.me; scikit-learn@python.org Cc: rth.yurc...@pm.me Subject: Re: [scikit-learn

Re: [scikit-learn] Next Sprint

That works for me as well. On 21/12/2018 16:00, Olivier Grisel wrote: > Ok for me. The last 3 weeks of February are fine for me. > > Le jeu. 20 déc. 2018 à 21:21, Alexandre Gramfort > mailto:alexandre.gramf...@inria.fr>> a écrit : > > ok for me > > Alex > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at

Re: [scikit-learn] Next Sprint

Ok for me. The last 3 weeks of February are fine for me. Le jeu. 20 déc. 2018 à 21:21, Alexandre Gramfort < alexandre.gramf...@inria.fr> a écrit : > ok for me > > Alex > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 8:35 PM Adrin wrote: > > > > It'll be the least favourable week of February for me, but I can make d

Re: [scikit-learn] Next Sprint

ok for me Alex On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 8:35 PM Adrin wrote: > > It'll be the least favourable week of February for me, but I can make do. > > On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 18:45 Andreas Mueller wrote: >> >> Works for me! >> >> On 12/19/18 5:33 PM, Gael Varoquaux wrote: >> > I would propose the week o

Re: [scikit-learn] Next Sprint

It'll be the least favourable week of February for me, but I can make do. On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 18:45 Andreas Mueller wrote: > Works for me! > > On 12/19/18 5:33 PM, Gael Varoquaux wrote: > > I would propose the week of Feb 25th, as I heard people say that they > > might be available at this t

Re: [scikit-learn] Next Sprint

Works for me! On 12/19/18 5:33 PM, Gael Varoquaux wrote: I would propose the week of Feb 25th, as I heard people say that they might be available at this time. It is good for many people, or should we organize a doodle? G On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 05:27:21PM -0500, Andreas Mueller wrote: Can w

Re: [scikit-learn] Next Sprint

I would propose the week of Feb 25th, as I heard people say that they might be available at this time. It is good for many people, or should we organize a doodle? G On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 05:27:21PM -0500, Andreas Mueller wrote: > Can we please nail down dates for a sprint? > On 11/20/18 2:25

Re: [scikit-learn] Next Sprint

Can we please nail down dates for a sprint? On 11/20/18 2:25 PM, Gael Varoquaux wrote: On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 08:15:07PM +0100, Olivier Grisel wrote: We can also do Paris in April / May or June if that's ok with Joel and better for Andreas. Absolutely. My thoughts here are that I want to min

Re: [scikit-learn] Next Sprint

On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 08:15:07PM +0100, Olivier Grisel wrote: > We can also do Paris in April / May or June if that's ok with Joel and better > for Andreas. Absolutely. My thoughts here are that I want to minimize transportation, partly because flying has a large carbon footprint. Also, for per

Re: [scikit-learn] Next Sprint

We can also do Paris in April / May or June if that's ok with Joel and better for Andreas. I am teaching on Fridays from end of January to March. But I can miss half a day of sprint to teach my class. -- Olivier ___ scikit-learn mailing list scikit-lea

Re: [scikit-learn] Next Sprint

Paris will have more scikit-learn people, Austin will have numpy, scipy, matplotlib and Jupyter people as well. On 11/18/18 5:15 PM, Joel Nothman wrote: and which would be better to aspire to? Paris in Feb, or Austin in July? On Sun, 18 Nov 2018 at 21:07, Joel Nothman

Re: [scikit-learn] Next Sprint

and which would be better to aspire to? Paris in Feb, or Austin in July? On Sun, 18 Nov 2018 at 21:07, Joel Nothman wrote: > When in Feb would we be talking? I'll start mooting it with stakeholders > :) I'm hopeful, but not overly optimistic, that it could work. > > I should also note that weekd

Re: [scikit-learn] Next Sprint

When in Feb would we be talking? I'll start mooting it with stakeholders :) I'm hopeful, but not overly optimistic, that it could work. I should also note that weekdays work better than weekends for me, as I keep away from computers from Friday evening through to Saturday night. On Sun, 18 Nov 20

Re: [scikit-learn] Next Sprint

I mean it would be amazing to have you there. Should we start nailing things down then? It's not that long until February. Looks like Hanmin can't make it. The NIPS sprint anniversary made me think maybe we should think about who else to invite. I have some funds we could use for paying for tra

Re: [scikit-learn] Next Sprint

Ha! Well, it looks like I won't be teaching the NLP unit at my uni next year (would usually occupy me March-July), so there is no fundamental problem with disappearing in February, if I can get babysitters, and my boss, on board. (Although I am trying to plan another overseas trip for April, but th

Re: [scikit-learn] Next Sprint

On 11/15/18 9:41 AM, Gael Varoquaux wrote: On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 09:14:30AM -0500, Andreas Mueller wrote: Are there any plans for a next sprint (in Paris/Europe?)? We're happy to host one in Paris, ideally in second half of February. I have to teach, so I'd prefer summer. I'm teaching Mo

Re: [scikit-learn] Next Sprint

Not sure if it counts and/or it'll be as fruitful as one of yours, but we're trying to gauge/raise the interest in a meetup this coming Tuesday in Berlin, and if there's interest, we'll try to organize one in Jan/Feb. Cheers, Adrin. On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 at 15:44 Gael Varoquaux wrote: > On Thu,

Re: [scikit-learn] Next Sprint

On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 09:14:30AM -0500, Andreas Mueller wrote: > Are there any plans for a next sprint (in Paris/Europe?)? We're happy to host one in Paris, ideally in second half of February. Gaël > OpenML would like to join us next time and I think that would be cool. > But they (and I ;) ne

Re: [scikit-learn] Next sprint in Paris (july 16th and 17th)

Hi Sergio, I'm sorry but this sprint is quite short and thus will be for experienced contributors (at least experienced with the scikit-learn contributing work flow). We'll probably organize less restrictive sprints in the future. Best regards, Jeremie On 04/07/2018 11:08, Sergio Solórz

Re: [scikit-learn] Next sprint in Paris (july 16th and 17th)

Hi Sergio, I'm sorry but this sprint is quite short and thus will be for experienced contributors (at least experienced with the scikit-learn contributing work flow). We'll probably organize less restrictive sprints in the future. Best regards, Jeremie On 04/07/2018 11:08, Sergio Solórz

Re: [scikit-learn] Next sprint in Paris (july 16th and 17th)

Hi everyone, Regarding the Python Sprint in Paris, I would like to know if it is possible to attend if one wants to contribute but has never done it before. In other words, is it "reserved" for experienced contributors/developers of sckikit-learn or newcomers can join as well? Best, Sergio On