On 13 October 2016 at 08:36, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> going to the mailing list
>
> On 10/13/2016 01:35 AM, Raghav R V wrote:
>
> Thanks for the messages {Ga|Jo}el. ;)
>
>> We can use "needs second review" as an alternative to "MRG+1" but I don't
>> see the point of using both.
going to the mailing list
On 10/13/2016 01:35 AM, Raghav R V wrote:
Thanks for the messages {Ga|Jo}el. ;)
> We can use "needs second review" as an alternative to "MRG+1" but I
don't see the point of using both.
I see the system of MRG+1 and MRG+2 as a more robust way of tracking
approvals