On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 08:01:03AM -0700, Jake Vanderplas wrote:
> If we think that it's worth updating our arpack clone and copying the
> test suite from scipy, I'd be happy to prepare a PR. It would make our
> arpack port more stable and increase our test coverage by ~500 lines,
> which is a
2012/7/26 Jake Vanderplas :
> Hi,
> On 07/26/2012 02:37 AM, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
>
>> Awesome! I just want to thank the team: after I sent this email a lot of
>> different people pitched in and we are now with a coverage level that is
>> above where we were a couple month ago:
>> https://jenkins.
Hi,
On 07/26/2012 02:37 AM, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> Awesome! I just want to thank the team: after I sent this email a lot of
> different people pitched in and we are now with a coverage level that is
> above where we were a couple month ago:
> https://jenkins.shiningpanda.com/scikit-learn/job/pyth
>
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:32:19AM +0200, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 12:18:46AM +0200, Olivier Grisel wrote:
> > > Recent merges have slowly decreased the test coverage ratio of
> > > the
> > > code base (from nearly 90% down to 85% now):
>
> > This email discusses how
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:32:19AM +0200, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 12:18:46AM +0200, Olivier Grisel wrote:
> > Recent merges have slowly decreased the test coverage ratio of the
> > code base (from nearly 90% down to 85% now):
> This email discusses how to do something about
Have you tried class_weight='auto'?
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will inc
May be this will clarify problem -
I have unbalanced class data in which I am performing SVM classification.
Classification with equal weight for both class gives very
low sensitivity etc. (misclassification of low data class).
I tried give different class weight but I am not sure how to do
it auto
2012/7/26 Gael Varoquaux :
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:48:48AM +0200, Olivier Grisel wrote:
>> Note that jenkins automatically publishes code coverage reports with
>> annotated source code:
>
> Yes, but they don't match what I get on my box.
They are computed with `make test-coverage` as well on
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:48:48AM +0200, Olivier Grisel wrote:
> Note that jenkins automatically publishes code coverage reports with
> annotated source code:
Yes, but they don't match what I get on my box.
--
Live Secur
Note that jenkins automatically publishes code coverage reports with
annotated source code:
https://jenkins.shiningpanda.com/scikit-learn/job/python-2.7-numpy-1.5.1-scipy-0.10.0/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/coverage/index.html
You can order the modules by "coverage %" or by "missing" and get the
2012/7/25 Fred Mailhot :
> Hi all,
>
> I've got a text classification problem on which LogisticRegression
> consistently outperforms SGDClassifier(loss="log") by a few percentage
> points on the smallish [O(10^5) points] datasets I've been using for initial
> development/testing. The data set I'll
11 matches
Mail list logo
