Re: [Scikit-learn-general] ANN: scikit-learn 0.12

2012-09-07 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
meanwhile -- uploaded to Debian experimental and all releases on NeuroDebian. While testing the installation I ran into a few issues while sklearn.test(): * bulk of repeating deprecation warnings * some failures from nose (I think similar ones were reported before to be ignored -- correct me if

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Whatever happened to moving the website

2012-09-07 Thread Fabian Pedregosa
The current .htaccess file that does the redirects (done by Gael) is: """ Options +FollowSymLinks RewriteEngine on RedirectMatch permanent ^/$ http://scikit-learn.org/stable RewriteRule ^modules/(.*) http://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/$1 [R=301,L] RewriteRule ^auto_examples/(.*) http://scikit-

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] memory troubles with RidgeClassifier

2012-09-07 Thread Fabian Pedregosa
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Olivier Grisel wrote: > 2012/9/7 Lars Buitinck : >> I just tried running the document classification example with all 20 >> classes, but the RidgeClassifier was taking so much memory that it >> triggered the OOM killer. This didn't happen before, so it much be a >>

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] memory troubles with RidgeClassifier

2012-09-07 Thread Mathieu Blondel
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 11:41 PM, Lars Buitinck wrote: > 2012/9/7 Mathieu Blondel : > > On my box, RidgeClassifier finishes in 136 seconds but kNN dies with > > MemoryError. > > That's incredibly slow compared to all the other classifiers. Also > without --all_categories, it's slower than everythi

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] memory troubles with RidgeClassifier

2012-09-07 Thread Olivier Grisel
2012/9/7 Lars Buitinck : > 2012/9/7 Olivier Grisel : >> Maybe the default feature extraction has changed and made the matrix >> much denser that it used to be for this example? Although recent >> changes to the vectorizer would tend to decrease the number of >> features (min_df=2) hence make the pr

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] memory troubles with RidgeClassifier

2012-09-07 Thread Lars Buitinck
2012/9/7 Olivier Grisel : > Maybe the default feature extraction has changed and made the matrix > much denser that it used to be for this example? Although recent > changes to the vectorizer would tend to decrease the number of > features (min_df=2) hence make the problem smaller to solve. What w

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] memory troubles with RidgeClassifier

2012-09-07 Thread Olivier Grisel
2012/9/7 Lars Buitinck : > 2012/9/7 Mathieu Blondel : >> On my box, RidgeClassifier finishes in 136 seconds but kNN dies with >> MemoryError. > > That's incredibly slow compared to all the other classifiers. Also > without --all_categories, it's slower than everything else. > > I've already found o

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] memory troubles with RidgeClassifier

2012-09-07 Thread Lars Buitinck
2012/9/7 Mathieu Blondel : > On my box, RidgeClassifier finishes in 136 seconds but kNN dies with > MemoryError. That's incredibly slow compared to all the other classifiers. Also without --all_categories, it's slower than everything else. I've already found out where things go wrong, though I st

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] memory troubles with RidgeClassifier

2012-09-07 Thread Mathieu Blondel
On my box, RidgeClassifier finishes in 136 seconds but kNN dies with MemoryError. Could you try to identify which commit introduced the regression with git bisect? Mathieu pred = clf.predict(X_test) File "/Users/mathieublondel/Desktop/projects/scikit-learn/sklearn/neighbors/classification.

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] memory troubles with RidgeClassifier

2012-09-07 Thread Olivier Grisel
2012/9/7 Lars Buitinck : > I just tried running the document classification example with all 20 > classes, but the RidgeClassifier was taking so much memory that it > triggered the OOM killer. This didn't happen before, so it much be a > recent change to the codebase. Does anyone know what may be c

[Scikit-learn-general] memory troubles with RidgeClassifier

2012-09-07 Thread Lars Buitinck
I just tried running the document classification example with all 20 classes, but the RidgeClassifier was taking so much memory that it triggered the OOM killer. This didn't happen before, so it much be a recent change to the codebase. Does anyone know what may be causing this? -- Lars Buitinck S

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Whatever happened to moving the website

2012-09-07 Thread Olivier Grisel
2012/9/7 Andreas Müller : > I don't understand the connection between redirecting and hosting. > Aren't the rewrite rules at the domain provider? This is about redirects inside the website: e.g. an old section that was moved from one place to another: the goal is avoid breaking incoming links from

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Whatever happened to moving the website

2012-09-07 Thread Andreas Müller
I don't understand the connection between redirecting and hosting. Aren't the rewrite rules at the domain provider? What are the current redirects? - Ursprüngliche Mail - Von: "Olivier Grisel" An: [email protected] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. September 2012 00:02:47 B

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Whatever happened to moving the website

2012-09-07 Thread Olivier Grisel
2012/9/7 Jaques Grobler : > What would be the perks of moving the website from where it is now? On github it's easy to make anybody be able to push a new version of the website (e.g. right after having merged a new feature with nice documentation / examples to be able to show off on twitter while

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Whatever happened to moving the website

2012-09-07 Thread Jaques Grobler
What would be the perks of moving the website from where it is now? 2012/9/5 Olivier Grisel > 2012/9/4 Andreas Mueller : > > Hey everybody. > > I was just wondering what happened to moving the website. > > What was the problem again? > > Can we maybe open an issue or something with a todo? > > T

Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Reports on custom kernels

2012-09-07 Thread Andreas Müller
Hi Abdalrahman. I am not sure I know what you mean. Are you referring to the rbf parameter selection example? Yes, doing the same for other kernels / estimators is certainly possible. Just do it the same way as in the example. Unfortunately the interface to the grid search is not very nice at the m

[Scikit-learn-general] Obtain reports on custom kernels

2012-09-07 Thread abdalrahman eweiwi
Hi, Is it possible to generate reports similar to the example provided in the documentation for custom kernels? Is it possible to have it this way? tuned_parameters = [{'kernel': ['my_kernal'], 'C' : list(np.logspace(-3,3,10))}] Thanks Abd --

[Scikit-learn-general] Reports on custom kernels

2012-09-07 Thread abdalrahman eweiwi
Hi, Is it possible to generate reports similar to the example provided in the documentation for custom kernels? Is it possible to have it this way? tuned_parameters = [{'kernel': ['my_kernal'], 'C' : list(np.logspace(-3,3,10))}] Thanks --