Re: R: MUSCLE SSP for Cyberflex

2000-02-10 Thread Michael Renzmann
Hi. > > Some of the crypto functions may require a > > significant increase in the WWT on the reader. > > If you let me know what reader you are using I > > can see if this will be a problem and fix it > > before it exists. > Could you please explain me what "WWT" stands for, > because I don't

Re: R: MUSCLE SSP for Cyberflex

2000-02-09 Thread Jim Rees
As David pointed out, WWT is work waiting time. See 7816-3/8.2. It's the amount of time the terminal should wait before deciding the card isn't going to respond. It is normally 1 second for cards with default timing, such as Cyberflex. Every time you call apdu.waitExtension() it resets the tim

Re: R: MUSCLE SSP for Cyberflex

2000-02-09 Thread David Corcoran
Hello, I tried to answer the questions in between On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, kefren wrote: > David wrote: > > > Some of the crypto functions may require a > > significant increase in the WWT on the reader. If you let me know what > > reader you are using I can see if this will be a problem and f

R: MUSCLE SSP for Cyberflex

2000-02-09 Thread kefren
David wrote: > Some of the crypto functions may require a > significant increase in the WWT on the reader. If you let me know what > reader you are using I can see if this will be a problem and fix it before > it exists. Could you please explain me what "WWT" stands for, because I don't underst

R: MUSCLE SSP for Cyberflex

2000-02-09 Thread kefren
Xenitellis wrote: > Hmm, does the SLB-Cyberflex support RSA-Authentication and Signing? > Which "Cyberflex" card do you have in particular? > I have Cyberflex(TM) Access SmartCards - Class 00 Crypto (ATR = 3B 16 94 81 10 06 01 81 3F), and it shoult support RSA 512/768/1024 general encryption/d

Re: MUSCLE SSP for Cyberflex

2000-02-09 Thread evan . cordes
> From: David Corcoran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I have not done any more work to the reference SSP for the Cyberflex Access > so any cryptographic work done on it would be great. You might see what > they guys from University of Michigan are doing - I know they were > interested in Access SSP.

Re: MUSCLE SSP for Cyberflex

2000-02-09 Thread Simos Xenitellis
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, kefren wrote: > Hi all, > > I had a look at SSP-Lite, and found it a bit incomplete. > As I'm really needing RSA-Authentication, and RSA-Signing services with > SLB-Cyberflex, I'm completing it by myself. > > Is there any "work-in-progress"-version more recent than the one

Re: MUSCLE SSP for Cyberflex

2000-02-08 Thread David Corcoran
Hello, I have not done any more work to the reference SSP for the Cyberflex Access so any cryptographic work done on it would be great. You might see what they guys from University of Michigan are doing - I know they were interested in Access SSP. Some of the crypto functions may require a sign

MUSCLE SSP for Cyberflex

2000-02-08 Thread kefren
Hi all, I had a look at SSP-Lite, and found it a bit incomplete. As I'm really needing RSA-Authentication, and RSA-Signing services with SLB-Cyberflex, I'm completing it by myself. Is there any "work-in-progress"-version more recent than the one on the Linuxnet Web-Site ?? Tommaso Cucinotta