+1 for Pavel from myself, he's one of the current SCL crew in RH.
Pavel, please, create a FAS account following steps at
https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/CommunityBuildSystem
Honza
On 01/15/2016 05:44 PM, Pavel Kajaba wrote:
Hi,
my name is Pavel Kajaba and I'd like to become a member of sclo-
On 01/14/2016 12:35 PM, Dominic Cleal wrote:
On 13/01/16 17:33, Honza Horak wrote:
#topic devtoolset-4 rebuilding updates
https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=10106
- bstinson plans to look at ^ in the evening hopefully
- we're looking for a volunteer to write more test
On 01/14/2016 07:35 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 3:33 AM, Honza Horak wrote:
#topic review of how development of new scls is working
rought proposal: building packages -> candidate -> sanity testing ->
testing -> [wait till rhscl is released] -> tag r
On 01/13/2016 06:33 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
#topic Provides/Obsoletes to centos-release-scl
- there is the older repo package called centos-release-SCL with
quite old packages and centos-release-scl now, witch packages build in cbs
- we should add Provides/Obsoletes into centos-release-scl
On 11/30/2015 04:47 PM, Robert Kratky wrote:
if the centos-release-scl-rh were to have a Provides: that matches
> >something that's also available from the RHSCL's setup, then this might
> >not be a problem; in an environ that has the RHSCL's setup, the content
> >will just come from there ( it w
Hey Robert, welcome on board!
Honza
On 01/20/2016 12:04 PM, Robert Kuska wrote:
Hello everyone!
My name is Robert Kuska and I would like to become member
of sclo-sig to help with packaging of python related packages.
Cheers,
Robert Kuska
{rkuska}
_
On 01/13/2016 05:14 AM, Dave Johansen wrote:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Honza Horak mailto:hho...@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 01/06/2016 05:41 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 8:04 AM, Honza Horak mailto:hho...@redhat.com>
<mailto:hho..
On 01/18/2016 05:12 PM, Farkas Levente wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 6:33 PM, Honza Horak mailto:hho...@redhat.com>> wrote:
#topic devtoolset-4 rebuilding updates
https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=10106
- bstinson plans to look at ^ in the evening hopefully
-
On 01/20/2016 07:12 PM, Farkas Levente wrote:
On 01/20/2016 06:12 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
On 01/18/2016 05:12 PM, Farkas Levente wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 6:33 PM, Honza Horak mailto:hho...@redhat.com>> wrote:
#topic devtoolset-4 rebuilding updates
https://bugs.cent
On 01/22/2016 12:28 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 21/01/16 09:38, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
If you want to sync some/all repositories from softwarecollections.org feel
free:
rsync -rP 'rsync://softwarecollection.org/repos/' ./
as a data point - how much content here is missing from the CentOS
On 01/22/2016 05:08 PM, Jarek Polok wrote:
Hi all !
My name is Jarek Polok and I would be interested
joining sclo-sig for packaging SSO (Single Sign On)
related tools/modules:
- mod_auth_mellon
- shibboleth
I don't see shibboleth in Fedora so can't easily find what it means in
practice,
SCLo SIG meeting will be today at 16:00 UTC (11:00 EST, 17:00 Brno,
11:00 Boston, 0:00+1d Tokyo, 1:00+1d Brisbane) in #centos-devel on Freenode.
= Topics =
I don't have any specific topics but want to be around and available
since there are now couple of more people building in SCLo SIG, so ma
* tags for new collections ruby, ror, python and maven created:
https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=10256
* we agreed to use scl-httpd24-mod_auth_mellon for the mod_auth_mellon,
extending httpd24 SCL (related to
https://www.redhat.com/archives/sclorg/2016-January/msg00068.html)
we should wri
+1 from me, Marek is one of the members of rhscl team.
Honza
On 02/02/2016 04:00 PM, Marek Skalický wrote:
Hello everyone!
My name is Marek Skalický and I would like to become member
of sclo-sig to help with packaging of MongoDB related packages.
Cheers,
Marek
{mskalick}
On 02/16/2016 03:18 PM, Dominic Cleal wrote:
Is there a good place to report bugs against sclo-* collections?
I'm aware that softwarecollections.org has a product in Red Hat's
Bugzilla with per-collection components, but this doesn't seem a good
place to log bugs against CentOS SCLo SIG collecti
On 02/27/2016 09:57 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 10:38 PM, Dave Johansen mailto:davejohan...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 10:12 PM, Dave Johansen
mailto:davejohan...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Honza Hora
On 03/01/2016 03:42 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
So, the only real issue seems to be the missing source .rpm for
felix-gogo-parent.
Do you think sources from devtoolset-3 could be used?
https://github.com/sclorg-distgit/felix-gogo-parent/tree/sig-sclo6-devtoolset-3-rh
I'm
On 03/04/2016 11:41 AM, Jarek Polok wrote:
Hello list
At present subversion versions on 6 and 7 differ
(1.6.X vs. 1.7.x): and these two version use incompatible
structure of local working copy (checkout).
In our place where user accounts data is stored
on a shared filesystem above causes major
On 03/04/2016 11:28 AM, Jarek Polok wrote:
Hello list
Current rh collections contain git19 one and my
understanding is RH is not going to put a newer git
version in there anytime soon (?) ..
Definitely not into the existing collection, since the versions are not
compatible. I don't think ther
On 03/04/2016 02:37 PM, Souvignier, Daniel wrote:
Ok. For me it will be the first time building an scl, so I'll need a
direction on where to start. So please notify me when repositories to clone
into are setup. But I know my way around rpm building in general.
SCL specifics are documented here
Nice work, Jarek!
There is a middle-step between candidate and release that you may use --
you can tag your builds to -testing tag and request adding the packages
to buildlogs repos (my similar request for other SCLs:
https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=10491)
Then packages will be available
ember of SIG first to get access to this git repo.
Honza
Best regards,
Daniel
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: sclorg-boun...@redhat.com [mailto:sclorg-boun...@redhat.com] Im Auftrag
von Honza Horak
Gesendet: Freitag, 4. März 2016 16:08
An: Jarek Polok ; sclorg@redhat.com
Betreff: Re: [sc
On 03/08/2016 01:16 PM, Jarek Polok wrote:
Hi Honza
On 03/08/2016 12:37 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
On 03/04/2016 04:25 PM, Souvignier, Daniel wrote:
Hi,
if I read this correctly, I can use the workflow described in the
readme of
https://github.com/sclorg/centpkg-sclo to get started, right?
Yes
I personally prefer mock for RPM building, since it is designed exactly
for that purpose and it also works in chroot. When working on a new SCL,
I create a separate profile in mock where scl-utils-build and
-build is in the basic buildroot. If you want to know more, I can
share some concrete ex
Feel free to get inspired from this:
https://github.com/hhorak/mock-example
Honza
On 03/10/2016 08:00 AM, Bryan Seitz wrote:
Please share:)
Bryan Seitz
Original message
From: Honza Horak
Date: 3/10/16 1:40 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: sclorg@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [scl.org
that they'll work.
Regards,
Daniel
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: sclorg-boun...@redhat.com [mailto:sclorg-boun...@redhat.com] Im Auftrag
von Honza Horak
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. März 2016 07:41
An: sclorg@redhat.com
Betreff: Re: [scl.org] Docker file for rpm building
I personally prefe
Hi Noah,
thank you for reporting, the issue with wrong redirection link was
caused by mistake and we're already fixing the redirection, so the old
links will work again soon.
Now, for the question about supported CentOS and RHSCL builds -- we're
now working on updating information for all th
The links should work (mistake is being fixed now), but it is not the
correct way of getting the RHSCL packages any more.
The thing is that the links like yours bellow will be hidden soon on
softwarecollections.org and only the steps summarized in this post will
be working:
https://www.redhat
On 03/15/2016 01:38 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:32 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
If you have any use case to use CentOS builds from softwarecollections.org
on RHEL, I'd like to know it, since my understanding is that every RHEL
machine should be fine with using packages
s to the centos packages.
Many Thanks
Stuart
On 03/15/2016 08:32 AM, Honza Horak wrote:
Hi Noah,
thank you for reporting, the issue with wrong redirection link was
caused by mistake and we're already fixing the redirection, so the old
links will work again soon.
Now, for the question about
I'm just building the missing package, so it should be ready soon:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/rhscl/centos-release-scl/monitor/
Honza
On 03/15/2016 04:13 PM, Stuart Campbell wrote:
Yes I think that this should work ok.
Thanks
Stuart
On 03/15/2016 11:11 AM, Honza Horak wrote
but we want
to make sure users are using only properly tested and supported packages
on RHEL platform.
Thanks for understanding,
Honza
On 03/15/2016 04:11 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
Oh, I wasn't aware there are RHEL subscriptions without access to RHSCL
packages. But in case you don't hav
Since there seems to be a meeting collision with Config Management SIG
on Wednesday, we agreed with Julien to alternate and so this week there
will be Config Management SIG meeting and the SCLo SIG meeting will be
held next Wednesday.
However, I'd like to move the meeting time one hour earlier
The meeting will be at 15:00 UTC (11:00 EST, 17:00 Brno, 11:00 Boston,
0:00+1d Tokyo, 1:00+1d Brisbane) in #centos-devel on Freenode.
I have no specific agenda for today, but will be at least available for
discussion potential issues if anybody has something.
Honza
__
0/2016 02:00 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
The meeting will be at 15:00 UTC (11:00 EST, 17:00 Brno, 11:00 Boston,
0:00+1d Tokyo, 1:00+1d Brisbane) in #centos-devel on Freenode.
I have no specific agenda for today, but will be at least available for
discussion potential issues if anybody has so
On 04/05/2016 10:59 AM, Souvignier, Daniel wrote:
thanks for the info. I'll try them out on our systems as soon as possible.
One question though: Why do the new testing software collections only get
synced on buildlogs.centos.org and not on mirror.centos.org? We mirror most
of mirror.centos.org o
I'm not aware about any immediate work on tomcat being available as SCL,
so if you want to start working on it, feel free to do it.
Honza
On 04/05/2016 04:12 PM, Souvignier, Daniel wrote:
Hi,
is it planned anywhere in the future to build a software collection for
tomcat to be able to use diff
Actually Dave was right, packages updates like your case are best to be
tracked in RH Bugzilla, since RHEL is the primary focus for SCL and that
is where it can be evaluated properly.
Honza
On 04/07/2016 01:52 PM, Richard Hodgson wrote:
Ah, thanks for the example ticket.
I'll raise in the Ce
The meeting will be at 16:00 UTC (12:00 EST, 18:00 Brno, 12:00 Boston,
1:00+1d Tokyo, 2:00+1d Brisbane) in #centos-devel on Freenode.
No specific agenda for today, but will be available today for discussion
if necessary. Except that, I'd like to look for a new timeslot for the
meeting, we move
I know about several people who are not very happy about current
timeslot for SCLo SIG sync-up meeting, including me, so.. For everybody
who thinks about attending SCLo SIG meetings regularly in the future,
please, vote which timeslot would be fine for you:
http://whenisgood.net/5k554ep
The v
Rebuild is not automatic and it is best-effort, but it should be done
soon. Thanks for pointing to that.
Honza
On 05/04/2016 12:09 PM, Matthias Leopold wrote:
Hi,
is there a reason why the rh-php56-php RPMS for CentOS don't get updated?
CentOS has version 5.6.5-7
RHEL has 5.6.5-8 for quite s
i.
Honza
On 04/28/2016 03:32 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
I know about several people who are not very happy about current
timeslot for SCLo SIG sync-up meeting, including me, so.. For everybody
who thinks about attending SCLo SIG meetings regularly in the future,
please, vote which timeslot would b
The meeting will be at 13:00 UTC (9:00 EST, 15:00 Brno) in #centos-devel
on Freenode.
Agenda:
* setting up Jenkins for Github PRs
* anything else?
Honza
___
SCLorg mailing list
SCLorg@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/sclorg
On 05/17/2016 02:57 PM, Remi Collet wrote:
Also, adding some of the packages
available in php5x-more to the official php scls, like the mcrypt and
imap modules for example?
I have started adding some in centos-sclo-sclo repository
See:
http://ftp-stud.fht-esslingen.de/pub/Mirrors/centos/7/sc
On 05/17/2016 04:14 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17/05/16 15:08, Honza Horak wrote:
On 05/17/2016 02:57 PM, Remi Collet wrote:
I think all serious project have dropped dep. on this extension (and
often only keep it as a fallback when openssl
There is a test that has been running for every new build, but the test
itself keeps failing (never worked properly imho). You might want to
fix/rewrite it, so you can easily check status of every rebuild:
https://github.com/sclorg/sclo-ci-tests/tree/master/collections/sclo-vagrant1-sclo/vagrant
We don't have any specific component in bugs.centos.org yet, so until we
have something there, feel free to use:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=softwarecollections.org
Honza
On 05/27/2016 03:42 PM, Vacelet, Manuel wrote:
Hi all,
I'm facing an issue that seems specific to ht
RHSCL 2.2 was released recently [1] and this release includes several
new collections:
rh-mariadb101
rh-postgresql95
rh-maven33
rh-mongodb30upg
rh-mongodb32
rh-python35
rh-nodejs4
rh-ruby23
rh-ror42
SRPMs were taken and rebuilt for CentOS users in cbs.centos.org by SCLo
SIG g
You can log in via Fedora FAS account and "import" a new collection
there. The URL will use your FAS username, so I'm just thinking about
creating one common username for collections from SCLo SIG, so the links
would not have to include particular usernames (they could if you prefer).
Suggeste
http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=11066
http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=11010
http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=11009
Any help appreciated.
Honza
On 06/03/2016 01:40 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
RHSCL 2.2 was released recently [1] and this release includes severa
I've tried the new package and it looks good, it does everything it
should from my PoV. The tested scenarios were:
* installing centos-release-SCL --> it pulled centos-release-scl-rh
* updating previously installed centos-release-SCL -->
centos-release-scl-rh replaced it
Thanks!
Honza
On 06/
General rule of what goes in is that it always depends on the author of
the particular collection.
For collections coming from SCLo SIG group (community), the best thing
to do would be sending pull requests on github as mentioned bellow and
contact this ML if nothing happens (not everybody tra
On 07/04/2016 03:11 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 12:01 AM, Honza Horak wrote:
General rule of what goes in is that it always depends on the author of the
particular collection.
For collections coming from SCLo SIG group (community), the best thing to do
would be sending
The packages have never been there, right? That's because users should
just install the packages either from RHSCL repos or CentOS mirrors
directly, depending on the system they use.
It should be hopefully clear from the information on this page:
https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhsc
On 09/05/2016 10:19 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
Hi,
there is only HTML page for DTS (Developer Toolset) version 3:
https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhscl/devtoolset-3/
with files at:
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/sclo/x86_64/rh/devtoolset-3/
But Red Hat also relea
I'm afraid I won't have a clear answer right now, but will try to help
at least where I can.
On 09/16/2016 04:11 AM, Noah Kantrowitz wrote:
Okay, to get the disclaimer out of the way, I understand that SCLo/CentOS
packages are not supported by RedHat. I'm trying to get my Chef SCL code to
wor
On 09/16/2016 08:27 PM, Noah Kantrowitz wrote:
On Sep 16, 2016, at 7:26 AM, Honza Horak wrote:
I'm afraid I won't have a clear answer right now, but will try to help at least
where I can.
On 09/16/2016 04:11 AM, Noah Kantrowitz wrote:
Okay, to get the disclaimer out of
I'm not able to make it for the next week's SCLo SIG meeting (was
supposed to be 1st Nov). If anybody is willing to hold the meeting, feel
free to do it, otherwise let's just cancel it.
Honza
___
SCLorg mailing list
SCLorg@redhat.com
https://www.redh
On 09/16/2016 07:20 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 14:07:49 +0200, Honza Horak wrote:
On 09/05/2016 10:19 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
But Red Hat also released DTS-4.0 which has no HTML page but files are at:
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/sclo/x86_64/rh/devtoolset-4
RHSCL 2.3, which was released recently [1], includes several new
collections. SRPMs were taken and rebuilt for CentOS users in
cbs.centos.org by SCLo SIG group.
The packages are now available in the testing repositories via e.g.:
sudo yum install centos-release-scl
sudo yum-config-manager
On 11/22/2016 10:53 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 11:11 PM, Honza Horak mailto:hho...@redhat.com>> wrote:
We still haven't finished rebuilding of the following two new SCLs
that are part of RHSCL 2.3:
rh-thermostat16
rh-eclipse46
what is th
On 12/08/2016 11:06 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 12/06/2016 02:48 PM, Stefan Ring wrote:
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
Java collections were typically bootstrapped by using older packages
from other collections or from RHEL. Specifically, rh-java-common was
built u
There are cases where some dependencies don't need to be converted into
SCL and also can be shared across more SCLs. We discussed this topic on
today's meeting and the following proposal is the outcome:
https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/SCLo#head-764a73d1d09cb348661406560ee2140b6f5b
I'm sorry for having those troubles before notifying before, it was
simply an error. However, since we haven't got more feedback, it looks
like majority of users already switched to the current way of installing
packages, which is on CentOS:
yum install centos-release-scl-rh
and on RHEL:
I think this is a good question for CentOS generally, I'm not sure
whether there are some guidelines for it already, but we should have
them, so forwarding to centos-devel. From my PoV it makes sense to keep
CBS license-free, so I'd say we should not build things that are not
100% clean.
Honz
Sorry for late respond. It might be interesting, but you're the first
asking about that. Can you, please, expand your vision? Do you need a
different build just for the postgres 9.5 connection?
Honza
On 11/09/2016 11:49 AM, Marco Rodrigues wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm not sure if this is the
Hi Nick,
I see 04/29/2017 to be the expire date for the current cert. Your wget
also works for me.
In any case, getting the RPM files from softwarecollections.org (your
link) for devtoolset-3 is the obsolete way, please, install the packages
using the directions available at
https://www.sof
Hello Aawardhan,
how do you install Postgres 9.5 in CentOS? Since it may be different
answer for the two cases bellow:
1) install from CentOS SCLo SIG repos:
yum install centos-release-scl-rh
yum install rh-postgresql95
2) install from Upstream repos:
yum install
https://download.pos
wrote:
We install it from Upstream repository.
In general what are the difference between postgresql95 and rh-postgresql95?
Thanks,
Aawardhan
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Honza Horak mailto:hho...@redhat.com>> wrote:
Hello Aawardhan,
how do you install Postgres 9.5 in CentOS?
This is basically a kick-off for getting more feedback for an idea
shared at
http://www.themindiseverything.eu/2017/03/software-collections-daemons-made.html.
Shortly, SCL has worked nicely for several years and people love them.
But even the beloved ones have some issues. And what we hear fro
On 03/21/2017 06:04 PM, Vacelet, Manuel wrote:
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Honza Horak mailto:hho...@redhat.com>> wrote:
This is basically a kick-off for getting more feedback for an idea
shared at
http://www.themindiseverything.eu/2017/03/software-collections-d
changes. The blog post says subpackages will be
used to ensure no breakage - I just want to re-iterate that this is important and should
not get lost if the proposal changes.
Thanks,
Wes
From: sclorg-boun...@redhat.com on behalf of Honza Horak
Sent: T
ourself.
-Original Message-
From: sclorg-boun...@redhat.com [mailto:sclorg-boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of
Griffin, Wesley (Fed)
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 10:49 AM
To: Honza Horak ; sclorg@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [scl.org] Idea: Software Collections Daemons Made System-wide
My use
Hi, we track this request at https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=12844
and just need to find a person eligible (Evolution seems to be the right
person) for changing the page. So far I don't see any reason why adding
links to keys should be problem.. except it takes time, which I'm sorry
about..
Yes, they do, if there is good enough reason (security or very important
fix). We definitely don't include all fixes.
Anyway, if there are reasons to have a newer git SCL, I'm totally not
against, we can have sclo-git212.. the changes in Fedora SPEC are not
that big..
Honza
On 03/10/2017 02
Thanks a lot!!
Honza
On 04/10/2017 03:51 PM, Dominic Cleal wrote:
On 10/04/17 14:33, Honza Horak wrote:
As for creating the tag, it would be great if you could create one for
us, because I don't have enough reputation on StackOverflow.. and not
sure anybody else from SCL folks here
On 04/11/2017 10:24 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 12:50 AM, meson wrote:
Hi,
is there any estimate on when Python 3.6 will be available as SCL?
Our devs are asking about it. If it's going to take a long time, I'll try my
On 04/13/2017 04:27 PM, Tomas Orsava wrote:
Hi!
On 04/11/2017 10:24 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
I've been mulling this idea over for the past couple of weeks, and I'm
wondering if it might make sense to create a rolling "sclo-python3"
SCL, that's initially forked from
https://www.softwarecollection
I definitely agree and the suggested name sclo-cassandra3 looks very
good to me. Let's wait couple of days for other ideas, but if there are
no objections we can ask for tags later next week..
Honza
On 06/14/2017 08:44 AM, Tomas Repik wrote:
Good news everyone!
Past year or so I've been work
Since nobody raised any push backs couple of days here, nor during
today's meeting, let' call this approved. I'll request the tags soon.
This SCL will depend on rh-maven33 and rh-java-common?
Honza
On 06/16/2017 02:58 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
I definitely agree and the sugg
SCL concept requires two basic things:
* change location where the files are installed by changing default RPM
macros (I expect something like that exists in the .deb packages as well)
* change the environment variables like PATH, etc. so the binaries and
libraries are found on the alternativ
Welcome on board!
Honza
On 06/29/2017 04:56 PM, Augusto Caringi wrote:
Hi everyone,
My name is Augusto Caringi, I'm a Software Engineer working at Red Hat in
the Core Services/Databases team and I would like to become member of sclo-sig
to help with packaging of Apache Cassandra.
Be
On 07/11/2017 10:44 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 1:24 AM, Davis, Daniel (NIH/NLM) [C]
wrote:
I’ve been lurking on this list for a while, and I wanted to bring myself up
to date. I noticed some talk of a community SCL for
On 07/12/2017 08:22 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 11:39 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
On 07/11/2017 10:44 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
1. Create a new sclo-python metapackage, using
https://github.com/sclorg-distgit/rh-python35/tree/master as a
starting point
2. For now, just create a
I'm +1 as well.
Honza
On 07/17/2017 05:17 PM, Remi Collet wrote:
Le 13/07/2017 à 18:36, Jarek Polok a écrit :
Hello all.
For the needs of other project we did rebuild few more packages for
python27 SCLo:
python27-Cython
python27-python-chardet
python27-python-flask
python27-python-requests
p
On 07/19/2017 04:34 PM, Tadej Janež wrote:
Hi!
I have a fleet of CentOS and RHEL machines which use rh-postgresql94
SCL.
I saw that RHEL machines got an update to version 9.4.12-1.el7, but the
CentOS machines didn't.
Hi Tadej, I've just started the builds, so they should get to the repos
in
On 07/26/2017 06:20 PM, Jarek Polok wrote:
On 07/17/2017 04:41 PM, Pavel Valena wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Jarek Polok"
To: sclorg@redhat.com
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 6:40:00 PM
Subject: [scl.org] How to get listed on softwarecollections.org ?
Dear all,
I'm the "guilty"
Ant, RPMs located on softwarecollections.org were obsolete for long
time, and did not receive any updates for years. You should rsync from
centos repositories directly.
Honza
On 08/14/2017 01:20 PM, Ant Kenworthy wrote:
Hi,
It seems that we can no longer use Rsync to mirror things from softw
On 08/26/2017 09:43 AM, Tadej Janež wrote:
Cool. One thing I would recommend is to remove the "Related COPR
projects" from the page since some people might wrongly think that the
SCL is being built with COPR and/or use an old version.
In case of rh-postgresql94, the latest version in COPR is 9.4
I've just started the scripts and it should be in repos in couple of
next days, once the publishing scripts notice the change.
Honza
On 08/30/2017 12:05 PM, Thomas Gerbet wrote:
Hello all,
Sorry for the noise (or if it's the wrong place to ask such question)
but I was wondering about the upd
Christoph, I'm afraid this request was kinda forgotten without proper
feedback, sorry for that.. Anyway, I expect you talk about devtoolset-6
SCL, right? Have you tried to use the aarch64 packages from buildlogs
(testing repository)?
$ yum install centos-release-scl-rh
$ yum-config-manager
Hey Steve,
that all sounds great to me, so welcome on board!
On 09/15/2017 09:35 AM, Steve Traylen wrote:
Hi,
I've requested to join the Software Collections SIG.
Initially I wanted to build and add rh-pythonXX-matplotlib against
Just a small correction here -- such packages should be part
On 09/18/2017 07:29 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Using RPM List Builder, I have a recipe for bootstrapping the initial
set of sclo-python RPMs locally in mock:
https://github.com/ncoghlan/pyscl-devel/
Before building that in the CentOS build system, I'm aiming to first
do a preview build in COPR:
htt
I'm happy to announce, that there are new Software Collections packages
available for testing (sig-sclo) on CentOS 6 and 7.
There are the following packages updates available in
centos-sclo-rh-testing:
devtoolset-6
httpd24
rh-nodejs4
rh-nodejs6
rh-ruby24
For installing them, run th
I'm happy to announce, that there are new Software Collections packages
available for testing (sig-sclo) on CentOS 6 and CentOS 7.
There are the following packages updates available in
centos-sclo-rh-testing:
rh-postgresql94
rh-postgresql95
rh-mongodb32
rh-mysql56
rh-mysql57
For in
I'm happy to announce, that there are new Software Collections available
for testing (sig-sclo).
There are the following packages available in centos-sclo-rh-testing for
CentOS 7:
rh-nodejs8
rh-python36
rh-php71
rh-maven35
rh-nginx112
For installing them, run:
$ sudo yum install
I'm happy to announce, that there are new Software Collections available
for testing (sig-sclo).
There are the following packages available in centos-sclo-rh-testing for
CentOS 6 and CentOS 7:
devtoolset-7
rh-mariadb102
rh-postgresql96
rh-mongodb34
For installing them, run:
$ sudo
It's been a while since I wrote an article about a cool feature that we
introduced together with Software Collections packaging format, which is
*the ability to share the environment on multiple machines by NFS
sharing *[1].
The idea is very simple -- install Software Collections of your favor
On 02/09/2018 04:23 PM, Marek Salwerowicz wrote:
Hi Honza,
On 09.02.2018 16:03, Honza Horak wrote:
It's been a while since I wrote an article about a cool feature that
we introduced together with Software Collections packaging format,
which is *the ability to share the environme
We only provide the x86_64 architecture for most of the collections,
with just few exceptions, due to limited resources on people side. Sorry.
Honza
On 09/11/2018 08:55 PM, Perelman, Nathan wrote:
devtoolset-7-libquadmath-devel.i686 is listed as being included in the
Redhat distribution (e.g.
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
