[jira] Closed: (SCM-79) Add remaining operations to Perforce provider

2005-11-29 Thread Emmanuel Venisse (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-79?page=all ] Emmanuel Venisse closed SCM-79: --- Assign To: Emmanuel Venisse Resolution: Fixed All patches are applied > Add remaining operations to Perforce provi

RE: [jira] Commented: (SCM-79) Add remaining operations to Perforce provider

2005-11-28 Thread Jeff Jensen
mplement more settings in Maven plugin. I would consider this Maven workspace spec "not temporary", but instead a regularly used workspace. -Original Message- From: Mike Perham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 10:24 PM To: scm-dev@maven.apache.org Sub

RE: [jira] Commented: (SCM-79) Add remaining operations to Perforce provider

2005-11-28 Thread Mike Perham
auto-naming the temp clientspec? Maybe hostname instead of username? mike -Original Message- From: Jeff Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon 11/28/2005 7:35 PM To: scm-dev@maven.apache.org Cc: Subject:RE: [jira] Commented: (SCM-79) Add remaining operations t

RE: [jira] Commented: (SCM-79) Add remaining operations to Perforce provider

2005-11-28 Thread Jeff Jensen
rkspace spec for the sync. -Original Message- From: Mike Perham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 4:34 PM To: scm-dev@maven.apache.org Subject: RE: [jira] Commented: (SCM-79) Add remaining operations to Perforce provider > - can you add checkouted files in a li

RE: [jira] Commented: (SCM-79) Add remaining operations to Perforce provider

2005-11-28 Thread Mike Perham
ease:perform requires this support since it checks out the tagged code into target/checkout. I don't know how to cleanly do this in Perforce. I will have to think about it but it's going to be ugly unless they have some sort of 'export' command that I don't know about. http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-79 mike

Re: [jira] Commented: (SCM-79) Add remaining operations to Perforce provider

2005-11-28 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
for this, and we'll use it in continuum. Emmanuel -Original Message- From: Emmanuel Venisse (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 11:18 AM To: scm-dev@maven.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (SCM-79) Add remaining operations to Perforce provider

RE: [jira] Commented: (SCM-79) Add remaining operations to Perforce provider

2005-11-28 Thread Mike Perham
uld need to create a clientspec that reflects how you want code checked out for your build and use that clientspec. -Original Message- From: Emmanuel Venisse (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 11:18 AM To: scm-dev@maven.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (S

Re: SCM-79

2005-11-22 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
it will be more easy if you can reformat it. http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-m2-development.html#Maven%20Code%20Style Emmanuel Mike Perham a écrit : I'm in the process of completing the rest of the operations on the Perforce provider. I've structured the code packaging simila

[jira] Commented: (SCM-79) Add remaining operations to Perforce provider

2005-11-22 Thread Emmanuel Venisse (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-79?page=comments#action_51650 ] Emmanuel Venisse commented on SCM-79: - cool > Add remaining operations to Perforce provider > - > > Key: SCM-79 &g

SCM-79

2005-11-22 Thread Mike Perham
I'm in the process of completing the rest of the operations on the Perforce provider. I've structured the code packaging similarly to the changelog command but my code format is not the maven standard (my company uses the Sun standard). Do you guys care, can you reformat the code for me when I su

[jira] Created: (SCM-79) Add remaining operations to Perforce provider

2005-11-22 Thread mike perham (JIRA)
Add remaining operations to Perforce provider - Key: SCM-79 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-79 Project: Maven SCM Type: Improvement Components: maven-scm-provider-perforce Versions: 1.0-beta-2