Vladimir Marek wrote:
> > > something | tee -a $mail_msg_file >> $LOGFILE
> > >
> > > instead of using exec redirection ? But that's probably out of the scope
> > > of bug 481 ...
> >
> > That's on my ToDo list for the "nightls.sh" cleanup.
> > The correct fix would be to use ksh93 and then use the
>From http://opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/scm/hg_teamware_transition:
> Philosophy
>
> * TW: you check individual files out (`sccs edit'), one at a time
> * Hg: you "check out" the entire workspace by updating your
> working directory
> * Discussion: context is everything
ank you
--
Vlad
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 193 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/scm-migration-dev/attachments/20080620/2e632dd0/attachment.bin>
Vladimir Marek wrote:
> > > The two different webrevs are
> > >
> > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~mjnelson/webrev.481/
> > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~mjnelson/webrev.481-firefox3.0/
>
> I just went around and was curious. I wonder why there's so many
>
> something | tee -a $mail_msg_file
Dean Roehrich writes:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 02:49:15PM -0400, Hua Huang wrote:
>> One of the big technical challenge is how we can do this without losing
>> the branch history (file revision/history).How do you manage to
>> preserve the
>> file revision/history from Teamware -> Mercurial
we did try a couple of other tools as well.. Let me try to dig some of
the notes (hopefully I can find them) to see what worked and what didn't in
terms of importing all branches.
I know for sure we didn't import all branches but just the HEAD in our case
As soon as I find the missing informatio
http://bugs.grommit.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519
--- Comment #2 from mike.kupfer at sun.com 2008-06-20 15:21 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> At present, we don't document webrev's output at all. Perhaps that's in
> error,
> but it's largely self explanatory, except perhaps the mode c
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 02:49:15PM -0400, Hua Huang wrote:
> One of the big technical challenge is how we can do this without losing
> the branch history (file revision/history).How do you manage to
> preserve the
> file revision/history from Teamware -> Mercurial? Can the same mechanism
> ap
Dear scm-migration-dev,
Lustre group (formally known as Clustre File System Inc, which was bought
by Sun Last year) has been using CVS as the SCM tool. In order to move in
the same direction as the ON community, we also plan on switching from CVS
to Mercurial.
One of the big technical challen
http://bugs.grommit.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519
--- Comment #1 from richlowe at richlowe.net 2008-06-20 14:45 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> A couple issues with the new webrev(1) man page:
>
> 1. There's no mention of the new warning about permissions. We should
>say something;
It seems cvsps doesn't care much for our CVS repo, but I haven't had a
chance to try tailor yet. (Originally we were also considering git,
and cvs2git worked perfectly.) Where you able to import all of your
CVS branch history into a single mercurial repository with tailor?
This has been our
We migrated the entire code base including history from CVS --> Mercurial
After investigating several tools, Tailor was selected as it could
handle importing the whole CVS history, and our tests showed that the
import was successful.
For more info, see http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/inde
Bonnie Corwin writes:
> Hi,
>
> I have made updates to http://opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/scm.
>
> and to
>
> http://opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/scm/hg_teamware_transition.
>
> I tried to lay out the information on the main page to be a little
> easier to parse.
>
> And I added inp
Dean Roehrich writes:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 12:16:04PM -0400, Richard Lowe wrote:
>> Dean Roehrich writes:
>>
>> > One of my users managed to hose up my gate hooks a few weeks back. For our
>> > project I wanted to have the gate hooks enforce a few things such as the
>> > first
>> > line
Dean Roehrich writes:
> One of my users managed to hose up my gate hooks a few weeks back. For our
> project I wanted to have the gate hooks enforce a few things such as the first
> line of the cset comments, only one head, ...and cstyle. It's easy to enforce
> the cstyle rules, given the way o
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 12:16:04PM -0400, Richard Lowe wrote:
> Dean Roehrich writes:
>
> > One of my users managed to hose up my gate hooks a few weeks back. For our
> > project I wanted to have the gate hooks enforce a few things such as the
> > first
> > line of the cset comments, only one h
http://bugs.grommit.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537
Summary: Checks.CStyle/JStyle will deadlock when the pipe buffer
fills
Product: SCM Migration
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: Solaris 11/Nevada
Status: NEW
One of my users managed to hose up my gate hooks a few weeks back. For our
project I wanted to have the gate hooks enforce a few things such as the first
line of the cset comments, only one head, ...and cstyle. It's easy to enforce
the cstyle rules, given the way our source tree is set up.
This
Hi,
I have made updates to http://opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/scm.
and to
http://opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/scm/hg_teamware_transition.
I tried to lay out the information on the main page to be a little
easier to parse.
And I added input from jbeck (thank you very much!) to the
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 13:08 -0400, Richard Lowe wrote:
> >> That's clearly a bug in the python shim between the two, we shouldn't
> >> do that, and it will need to be fixed. (you'd be just as screwed if
> >> you did 'hg cstyle', or should have been...)
> >
> > I don't see the problem when running
Sorry - change of plan.
Let's CANCEL today.
John Beck and Mark Nelson are both out of the office.
Mark will be sending an update about the code review by Monday.
Thanks.
Bonnie
Bonnie Corwin wrote:
> Fri, 6/13/08
> 10:30am-11:00am PDT
>
> Intl 215-446-3661
> US 866-545-5223
> AC 55
Fri, 6/13/08
10:30am-11:00am PDT
Intl 215-446-3661
US 866-545-5223
AC 5540840
Proposed Agenda
* Code review status
* SFW dates
* What else?
"Mark J. Nelson" wrote:
>
> I reckon the interest list for the webrev bug is as good a place as any to
> seek code review. I'm not an HTML guy, so I did a pretty generic
> seek-and-replace for ;<\([^ ]+\) \(.*\)/>;<\1 \2>; in the webrev
> source.
>
> The two different webrevs are
>
> ht
23 matches
Mail list logo
