James Carlson writes:
> Mike Kupfer writes:
>> Jim> - We'll have nearly zero experience in the organization in dealing
>> Jim> with the procedure. People seem to have a difficult time today
>> Jim> with teamware putback (often doing it from the wrong machine), and
>> Jim> adding a whole new t
Mike Kupfer writes:
> Jim> - We'll have nearly zero experience in the organization in dealing
> Jim> with the procedure. People seem to have a difficult time today
> Jim> with teamware putback (often doing it from the wrong machine), and
> Jim> adding a whole new tool change is likely to result
Mike Kupfer wrote:
> (Apologies in advance if I've written something nonsensical. I'm at
> home with a cold, and the neurons aren't all firing at 100%...)
>
>
>>"Jim" == James Carlson writes:
>
>
> Jim> The risk that I see on the other side of this is that if we "go
> Jim> live" with an h
(Apologies in advance if I've written something nonsensical. I'm at
home with a cold, and the neurons aren't all firing at 100%...)
> "Jim" == James Carlson writes:
Jim> The risk that I see on the other side of this is that if we "go
Jim> live" with an hg gate without having provided some r
Stephen Lau writes:
> I probably added you to the 'accept_these_nonmembers' list a while ago
> which is why your posts are getting through.
>
> ... goes to look at mailman ...
>
> and yes, that's what I did. I removed you from that list and just
> subscribed you to the list instead.
Thanks.
Richard Lowe writes:
> Odd, it should work the other way way. (if you're not subscribed,
> your posts shouldn't be getting through, but you should be able to
> subscribe).
Indeed. It's very strange. And the web site's "send me my password"
button claims to do something ... but I get nothing. :
James Carlson writes:
> Mike Kupfer writes:
>> >From a technical point of view, I think your proposal for a dual-scm
>> gate could work. On the other hand, given our chronic lack of staffing,
>> I have to wonder if it's a good use of our time.
>
> It's a good question, and one for which I don't
James Carlson wrote:
> Stephen Lau writes:
>
>> I probably added you to the 'accept_these_nonmembers' list a while ago
>> which is why your posts are getting through.
>>
>> ... goes to look at mailman ...
>>
>> and yes, that's what I did. I removed you from that list and just
>> subscribed yo
Mike Kupfer writes:
> >From a technical point of view, I think your proposal for a dual-scm
> gate could work. On the other hand, given our chronic lack of staffing,
> I have to wonder if it's a good use of our time.
It's a good question, and one for which I don't have a good answer.
(Btw ... I
James Carlson wrote:
> Richard Lowe writes:
>
>> Odd, it should work the other way way. (if you're not subscribed,
>> your posts shouldn't be getting through, but you should be able to
>> subscribe).
>>
>
> Indeed. It's very strange. And the web site's "send me my password"
> button clai
>From a technical point of view, I think your proposal for a dual-scm
gate could work. On the other hand, given our chronic lack of staffing,
I have to wonder if it's a good use of our time.
We'll get some testing when SFW moves, though with fewer people and
reduced likelihood of their having to
James Carlson writes:
> I've looked through the work being done on this project, and I see a
> lot of good stuff here. The work done so far has been based on making
> Hg users just as successful with the new tools as with the old ones,
> and that does seem important.
>
> However, I have a concer
I've looked through the work being done on this project, and I see a
lot of good stuff here. The work done so far has been based on making
Hg users just as successful with the new tools as with the old ones,
and that does seem important.
However, I have a concern with the coming flag day. We're
13 matches
Mail list logo
