[scm-migration-dev] webrev for review: 268

2008-02-27 Thread Mike Kupfer
> "Jim" == James Carlson writes: Jim> I looked at $SRC/cmd/nsadmin/system, and we really haven't changed Jim> this file in decades, so it's time to ditch this logic. That sounds fine to me. I think current practice is to reserve /etc/system for the system administrator (i.e., if a develop

[scm-migration-dev] webrev for review: 268

2008-02-20 Thread James Carlson
James Carlson writes: > New webrev to follow ... All updated per review comments and automated tests in progress. I'll consider those review comments to be "final" unless someone squawks otherwise. http://cr.opensolaris.org/~carlsonj/webrev-268/ -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking

[scm-migration-dev] webrev for review: 268

2008-02-20 Thread James Carlson
Mike Kupfer writes: > Overall it looks good. A couple things caught my eye: > > * common_files/i.devlinktab_sparc [...] > but you've taken out the rm of /tmp/d.$$. Should that "cp" be "mv"? Good catch. I'll just put the "rm" back. > * common_files/i.etcsystem: > > Having i.etcsystem kno

[scm-migration-dev] webrev for review: 268

2008-02-14 Thread Mike Kupfer
Overall it looks good. A couple things caught my eye: * common_files/i.devlinktab_sparc There's 139 cp /tmp/d.$$ $dest but you've taken out the rm of /tmp/d.$$. Should that "cp" be "mv"? * common_files/i.etcsystem: Having i.etcsystem know /etc/system's most recent SCC

[scm-migration-dev] webrev for review: 268

2008-02-11 Thread James Carlson
Mike Kupfer writes: > I'll take a look at this. OK; thanks. Now that I'm back, I'll be regenerating with the SCCS #ident lines put back in place this morning. I'll install that as webrev-268-2 when done. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive

[scm-migration-dev] webrev for review: 268

2008-02-08 Thread Mike Kupfer
I'll take a look at this. mike

[scm-migration-dev] webrev for review: 268

2008-02-07 Thread James Carlson
Richard Lowe writes: > Mike Kupfer writes: > > >> "Jim" == James Carlson writes: > > > > Jim> let me know if there's an RTI-like process here (or if I should > > Jim> just push when ready). > > > > No RTI process. Code review by one reviewer (or more if appropriate), > > then push. > > You

[scm-migration-dev] webrev for review: 268

2008-02-07 Thread Mike Kupfer
> "Jim" == James Carlson writes: Rich> You'll need to affiliate with the project via the webapp before we Rich> can add you as having write access though. Rich> (should be a link on the project page, I think). Jim> I think there would be if I weren't listed as an editor/leader. Ah, right.

[scm-migration-dev] webrev for review: 268

2008-02-06 Thread Richard Lowe
Mike Kupfer writes: >> "Jim" == James Carlson writes: > > Jim> let me know if there's an RTI-like process here (or if I should > Jim> just push when ready). > > No RTI process. Code review by one reviewer (or more if appropriate), > then push. You'll need to affiliate with the project via

[scm-migration-dev] webrev for review: 268

2008-02-06 Thread James Carlson
Here's my completed and tested fix for #268: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~carlsonj/webrev-268/ Please send me any comments you might have on this and let me know if there's an RTI-like process here (or if I should just push when ready). -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking Sun Mic

[scm-migration-dev] webrev for review: 268

2008-02-06 Thread Mike Kupfer
> "Jim" == James Carlson writes: Jim> let me know if there's an RTI-like process here (or if I should Jim> just push when ready). No RTI process. Code review by one reviewer (or more if appropriate), then push. mike