On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:24 AM, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.comwrote:
I am actually thinking about stripping Docbook toolchain altogether
(better sooner than later), and move its maintenance into separate repo,
because its addition tripled repository size for all subsequent versions.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Gary Oberbrunner ga...@oberbrunner.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:24 AM, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am actually thinking about stripping Docbook toolchain altogether
(better sooner than later), and move its maintenance into separate
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Dirk Bächle tshor...@gmx.de wrote:
On 19.02.2014 18:07, Bill Deegan wrote:
Might I suggest we stop discussing it and just propose pull requests.
If you have a specific change in mind, then make it and send a pull
request.
Yup, I'm all for it. @Anatoly: the
On 19.02.2014 06:15, Bill Deegan wrote:
Anatoly,
bootstrap.py is not meant to be run by users, only developers.
-Bill
I'd even go one step further and say: it's primarily meant to be run by
release managers.
It's okay if you take on this role for yourself as a developer while
you're
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Bill Deegan b...@baddogconsulting.com wrote:
Anatoly,
bootstrap.py is not meant to be run by users, only developers.
I believe there is a terminology confusion. User is anybody who uses SCons.
Developer is anybody with commit right to the SCons repository.
On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 16:44 +, Managan, Rob wrote:
[…]
You can execute the local SCons directly from the src/ subdirectory by
first setting the SCONS_LIB_DIR environment variable to the local
src/engine subdirectory, and then executing the local src/script/scons.py
script to populate the
On 19.02.2014 18:07, Bill Deegan wrote:
Might I suggest we stop discussing it and just propose pull requests.
If you have a specific change in mind, then make it and send a pull
request.
Yup, I'm all for it. @Anatoly: the commits that introduced the new doc
toolchain are 8ca01af:0c9c8af
Hi Anatoly,
On 18.02.2014 05:46, anatoly techtonik wrote:
Why SCons bootstrap became dependent on external libraries?
I find it a major usability regression. Can this be fixed?
it didn't suddenly become dependent, it always was. We're now using
DocBook, so we need to process and transform
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Dirk Bächle tshor...@gmx.de wrote:
On 18.02.2014 05:46, anatoly techtonik wrote:
Why SCons bootstrap became dependent on external libraries?
I find it a major usability regression. Can this be fixed?
it didn't suddenly become dependent, it always was.
There
On 18.02.2014 12:12, anatoly techtonik wrote:
[...]
There is a mistake. The bootstrap process never require documentation tools
to be present.
Correct, the bootstrap process doesn't require doc tools...but the
SConstruct at the top-level does. So unless you call bootstrap.py from
the
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Dirk Bächle tshor...@gmx.de wrote:
On 18.02.2014 12:12, anatoly techtonik wrote:
[...]
There is a mistake. The bootstrap process never require documentation
tools
to be present.
Correct, the bootstrap process doesn't require doc tools...but the
On 18.02.2014 19:59, anatoly techtonik wrote:
[...]
You need to ensure that there are no warnings during the build process
and the warning about missing documentation build is among those that
you especially should not ignore as a release manager. ;)
I could live with both variants for the
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Dirk Bächle tshor...@gmx.de wrote:
On 18.02.2014 19:59, anatoly techtonik wrote:
[...]
You need to ensure that there are no warnings during the build process
and the warning about missing documentation build is among those that
you especially should not
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:12 PM, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Dirk Bächle tshor...@gmx.de wrote:
On 18.02.2014 19:59, anatoly techtonik wrote:
[...]
You need to ensure that there are no warnings during the build process
and the warning
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Dirk Bächle tshor...@gmx.de wrote:
On 18.02.2014 21:19, anatoly techtonik wrote:
[...]
Ok. I'll put it the other way. Between automating the job of release
manager,
which is done once in few months and automating the job of developer,
which
is more than
On 19.02.2014 00:00, anatoly techtonik wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Dirk Bächle tshor...@gmx.de wrote:
On 18.02.2014 21:19, anatoly techtonik wrote:
[...]
Ok. I'll put it the other way. Between automating the job of release
manager,
which is done once in few months and automating
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:08 AM, Dirk Bächle tshor...@gmx.de wrote:
On 19.02.2014 00:00, anatoly techtonik wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Dirk Bächle tshor...@gmx.de wrote:
On 18.02.2014 21:19, anatoly techtonik wrote:
[...]
Ok. I'll put it the other way. Between automating the
On 19.02.2014 00:14, anatoly techtonik wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:08 AM, Dirk Bächle tshor...@gmx.de wrote:
[...]
Okay, and when you have a simple SConstruct in a folder like
/tmp/sconstest, change into this folder via cd /tmp/sconstest and then
call
python
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Dirk Bächle tshor...@gmx.de wrote:
On 19.02.2014 00:14, anatoly techtonik wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:08 AM, Dirk Bächle tshor...@gmx.de wrote:
[...]
Okay, and when you have a simple SConstruct in a folder like
/tmp/sconstest, change into this folder
19 matches
Mail list logo
