Re: [Scons-dev] Time for a release?

2015-06-14 Thread Alexandre Feblot
Hello, As I expected this 2.3.5 to be released (this was 3 weeks ago), I didn’t yet add my latest merged pull requests to the patched 2.3.4 version we are currently using in our build farm, but this seems to have stalled. Dirk, what are your plans, should I wait or rather keep patching our

Re: [Scons-dev] Time for a release?

2015-05-21 Thread Dirk Bächle
On 21.05.2015 05:20, Bill Deegan wrote: William, Of course your vote counts! It's open source. +1 :) Dirk ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev

Re: [Scons-dev] Time for a release?

2015-05-20 Thread Dirk Bächle
Hi Bill, On 20.05.2015 16:36, Bill Deegan wrote: All, It's been a while since the last release and a number of fixes are in the repo, is it a good time for a release? I forget where we are with slots? Is that still on a branch or in default now? the slots branch hasn't been merged yet.

Re: [Scons-dev] Time for a release?

2015-05-20 Thread Bill Deegan
Dirk, Are you suggesting we should merge slots into default and push 2.4? Or push what we have as 2.4 and then merge slots? I'm thinking since slots will (could) break compatibility for some that we should have a major version change? (3.0?) If I remember correctly, that was our criteria for

Re: [Scons-dev] Time for a release?

2015-05-20 Thread Dirk Bächle
On 20.05.2015 20:35, Bill Deegan wrote: Could we push default as is as 2.3.5, and then merge slots and push that in a couple weeks? Then we could branch default as 2.3 prior to merge of slots? Sure, I have no objections to that. After 2.3.5 we could also branch out from default to a 2.4

Re: [Scons-dev] Time for a release?

2015-05-20 Thread Dirk Bächle
On 20.05.2015 21:20, Bill Deegan wrote: Dirk, Sounds great! Is that something you execute? :) Well, I'd be willing to try. ;) However, this definitely requires to have the Wiki available again, so I can lookup the single steps for the release procedure...and I'm not sure that I have all the

Re: [Scons-dev] Time for a release?

2015-05-20 Thread Bill Deegan
Dirk, Sounds great! Is that something you execute? :) -Bill On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Dirk Bächle tshor...@gmx.de wrote: On 20.05.2015 20:35, Bill Deegan wrote: Could we push default as is as 2.3.5, and then merge slots and push that in a couple weeks? Then we could branch default

Re: [Scons-dev] Time for a release?

2015-05-20 Thread Dirk Bächle
Bill, On 20.05.2015 19:37, Bill Deegan wrote: Dirk, Are you suggesting we should merge slots into default and push 2.4? Or push what we have as 2.4 and then merge slots? if I got Jason right we don't have to wait for Parts to synchronize our development, so we're free to latch on. I suggest

Re: [Scons-dev] Time for a release?

2015-05-20 Thread William Blevins
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Dirk Bächle tshor...@gmx.de wrote: On 20.05.2015 20:35, Bill Deegan wrote: Could we push default as is as 2.3.5, and then merge slots and push that in a couple weeks? Then we could branch default as 2.3 prior to merge of slots? Sure, I have no objections

Re: [Scons-dev] Time for a release?

2015-05-20 Thread Bill Deegan
William, Of course your vote counts! It's open source. -Bill p.s. Plus you have a good first name so I give it a little more weight :) On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 4:45 PM, William Blevins wblevins...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Dirk Bächle tshor...@gmx.de wrote: On

[Scons-dev] Time for a release?

2015-05-20 Thread Bill Deegan
All, It's been a while since the last release and a number of fixes are in the repo, is it a good time for a release? I forget where we are with slots? Is that still on a branch or in default now? -Bill ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org