Re: [Scons-dev] mercurial vs. git
My take is that HG is fine, and is a bit easier to use, for it usage model. However Git has gotten a lot better on windows, and as long as you don't do crazy stuff it is easy and safe to use. Git SVN support is a lot better than anything else today as well, so I find using it with other projects at work is very nice. I neutral on this at the moment. However I think I changing my view to go toward git more. In fact I have added Git support in Parts ( for checking out a component), I have not done this with HG as of yet. Jason ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
[Scons-dev] mercurial vs. git
Now that we've all been living with hg for a while, what are people's opinions on hg vs. git for SCons? I'll admit I'm much deeper into git these days and I think overall it's a better system. But I'm interested in what you all think. We could switch pretty easily if there was enough interest, or we could just stay with hg and get on with life. :-) -- Gary ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
Re: [Scons-dev] mercurial vs. git
+1 git (I only use hg for scons, I use git for everything else. So not a technical reason, but a brain caching reason) On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Gary Oberbrunner ga...@oberbrunner.comwrote: Now that we've all been living with hg for a while, what are people's opinions on hg vs. git for SCons? I'll admit I'm much deeper into git these days and I think overall it's a better system. But I'm interested in what you all think. We could switch pretty easily if there was enough interest, or we could just stay with hg and get on with life. :-) -- Gary ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
Re: [Scons-dev] mercurial vs. git
On 29.09.2013 20:07, Gary Oberbrunner wrote: Now that we've all been living with hg for a while, what are people's opinions on hg vs. git for SCons? I'll admit I'm much deeper into git these days and I think overall it's a better system. But I'm interested in what you all think. We could switch pretty easily if there was enough interest, or we could just stay with hg and get on with life. :-) At the moment I see no compelling reason to change our VCS again. Our current workflows are fine and documented (a bit). Since SCons switched to hg, I'm now using it for all my private work as well and am quite happy with it. So, my bias leans more towards hg. -1 from me, but I wouldn't run away from the project if I had to use git in the future. Regards, Dirk ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
Re: [Scons-dev] mercurial vs. git
Anatoly, On Sep 29, 2013, at 12:19 PM, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Gary Oberbrunner ga...@oberbrunner.com wrote: Now that we've all been living with hg for a while, what are people's opinions on hg vs. git for SCons? I'll admit I'm much deeper into git these days and I think overall it's a better system. But I'm interested in what you all think. We could switch pretty easily if there was enough interest, or we could just stay with hg and get on with life. :-) My choice is mostly dictated by language. If I used Git, I probably used CMake or premake. The only advantage of Git I see is GitHub. Otherwise both are on par. Git has logical feature branches and dumb repeated add/commit commands. Mercurial screws feature branches concept, but MQs are awesome. So -1, as will require migrating to GitHub and we still haven't done anything awesome since last migration. =/ Switching to git would not require switching to github. Bitbucket.org has supported git for quite some time. -Bill ___ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
