Re: [Scottish] Onboard LAN

2003-11-23 Thread Janice
Thanks Colin, IIRC you would expect to see a: kernel-source-2.4.20-6 too if the kernel sources were installed. If you install drivers from a binary rpm, then (usuallly) it needs to be an exact match for the kernel version. Recompiling from source circumvents many of the problems -

Re: [Scottish] Onboard LAN

2003-11-23 Thread Janice
The commands I used: [EMAIL PROTECTED] janice]# rpm -i NVIDIA_nforce-1.0-0261.rh90up_2.4.20_6.athlon.rpm package NVIDIA_nforce-1.0-0261.rh90up_2.4.20_6 is already installed [EMAIL PROTECTED] janice]# rpm -e NVIDIA_nforce-1.0-0261.rh90up_2.4.20_6.athlon.rpm error: package

Re: [Scottish] Onboard LAN

2003-11-23 Thread Janice
Thanks for all the advice, I think I managed to uninstall the rpm rpm -e NVIDIA_nforce-1.0-0261.rh90up_2.4.20_6 (had been doing that wrong) I then installed it again: [EMAIL PROTECTED] janice]# rpm -i NVIDIA_nforce-1.0-0261.rh90up_2.4.20_6.athlon.rpm depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in

Re: [Scottish] Onboard LAN

2003-11-22 Thread Colin McKinnon
On Saturday 22 November 2003 10:11, Janice wrote: Hi again, Think I have made a big mistake. Does the following mean that I don't have the kernel source installed? [EMAIL PROTECTED] janice]$ rpm -qa | grep kernel kernel-pcmcia-cs-3.1.31-13 kernel-2.4.20-6 IIRC you would expect to see a:

[Scottish] Onboard LAN

2003-11-21 Thread Janice
Hi, I am having terrible trouble with the nvidia nforce chipset on my motherboard. I downloaded and installed (or so I thought) the rpm for RH9. But when I tried to set up a network found that the eth0 was not seen. Advice from nvnews.net was: It means that the nvnet driver has been miscompiled