Re: Test problem on Debian/unstable armhf

2012-02-01 Thread Dominique Dumont
Le Wednesday 1 February 2012 10:40:43, Tobias Leich a écrit :
> It would help if I had a armhf virtual machine. How to get one?
> There is no armhf iso-image. Is armel the same?
> URL: http://www.debian.org/CD/jigdo-cd/

armel is almost the same. armhf better uses CPU floating point HW.

One possibility is to get an arm hf image there:

 http://www.powerdeveloper.org/platforms/efikamx/linux

But this image contains a kernel for efika device.

You'll have to provide a separate kernel for a versatile board if you want to 
run qemu:

http://people.debian.org/~aurel32/qemu/armel/

there's no problem mixing armel kernel with armhf userspace.

then run something like:

qemu-system-arm -M versatilepb -kernel ./vmlinuz-2.6.32-5-versatile -initrd 
./initrd.img-2.6.32-5-versatile -hda ./efika-stuff.img -m 256 -append 
"root=/dev/sda1 m=256M"

HTH

Dominique
--
http://config-model.wiki.sourceforge.net/ -o- http://search.cpan.org/~ddumont/
http://www.ohloh.net/accounts/ddumont -o- http://ddumont.wordpress.com/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: Test problem on Debian/unstable armhf

2012-02-01 Thread Tobias Leich
Hi, you hit one of two problems I couldnt figure out yet right.

1) The problem you posted is IMO more a performance issue and will
happen on slow or busy machines.

2) t/mixer_channels.t: a problem with multithreading an C-callbacks.
This happens just on BSDs as far as I know.

It would help if I had a armhf virtual machine. How to get one?
There is no armhf iso-image. Is armel the same?
URL: http://www.debian.org/CD/jigdo-cd/

Cheers, Tobias

Am 01.02.2012 09:28, schrieb Dominique Dumont:
> Hello
>
> I've uploaded SDL-perl 2.536 on Debian/unstable . On armhf,
> sdlx-controller-interface test fails with the following message:
>
> # Failed test at t/sdlx_controller_interface.t line 109.
> # Structures begin differing at:
> # $got->[0] = '0'
> # $expected->[0] = '1'
> # Looks like you failed 1 test of 154.
> t/sdlx_controller_interface.t ...
>
> Any idea why ?
>
> The full build log is there:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libsdl-perl&arch=armhf&ver=2.536-1&stamp=1328045545
>
> (BTW you should use eq_or_diff from Test::Differences instead of
> is_deeply. we'd get more information from the test failure.)
>
> All the best
>
> --
> http://config-model.wiki.sourceforge.net/ -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~ddumont/
> http://www.ohloh.net/accounts/ddumont -o- http://ddumont.wordpress.com/
>




Test problem on Debian/unstable armhf

2012-02-01 Thread Dominique Dumont
Hello

I've uploaded SDL-perl 2.536 on Debian/unstable . On armhf,
sdlx-controller-interface test fails with the following message:

#   Failed test at t/sdlx_controller_interface.t line 109.
# Structures begin differing at:
#  $got->[0] = '0'
# $expected->[0] = '1'
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 154.
t/sdlx_controller_interface.t ... 

Any idea why ?

The full build log is there:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libsdl-perl&arch=armhf&ver=2.536-1&stamp=1328045545

(BTW you should use eq_or_diff from Test::Differences instead of 
is_deeply. we'd get more information from the test failure.)

All the best

--
http://config-model.wiki.sourceforge.net/ -o- http://search.cpan.org/~ddumont/
http://www.ohloh.net/accounts/ddumont -o- http://ddumont.wordpress.com/



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.