Thank you Valerie!
On 20.05.2014 3:16, Valerie (Yu-Ching) Peng wrote:
Changes look fine to me.
Thanks,
Valerie
On 05/16/14 08:54, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
Hello!
It was reported that CardTerminal.isCardPresent(),
CardTerminal.waitForCardAbsent(...) and
CardTerminal.waitForCardPresent(...) do
Changes look fine to me.
Thanks,
Valerie
On 05/16/14 08:54, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
Hello!
It was reported that CardTerminal.isCardPresent(),
CardTerminal.waitForCardAbsent(...) and
CardTerminal.waitForCardPresent(...) do not work correctly on Mac OS X.
It is due to the difference in the types
On 05/18/2014 10:36 PM, Wang Weijun wrote:
> I do notice MIT's krb5 doc has no kdc_timeout at all.
MIT krb5's sendto_kdc timeouts are all hardcoded and, as far as I can
tell, they always have been. Way back in 1.2, there were some global
variables which a sufficiently dodgy application could set,
A sub second unit would be used. However we use time_t, so currently sub second
time is not possible in Heimdal.
The default unit is seconds.
Skickat från min iPad
19 maj 2014 kl. 05:07 skrev "Henry B Hotz"
mailto:hbh...@oxy.edu>>:
I presume this is for parameters specified the "Java way", an
On 5/19/2014 9:49 PM, Wang Weijun wrote:
> After some discussion with mit and heimdal lead engineers, I don't want to
> support ms at the moment. mit does not use kdc_timeout at all and heimdal's
> internal presentation is of seconds.
>
> So this is my plan: support "s" but if unspecified treat
After some discussion with mit and heimdal lead engineers, I don't want to
support ms at the moment. mit does not use kdc_timeout at all and heimdal's
internal presentation is of seconds.
So this is my plan: support "s" but if unspecified treat it as "ms". There will
be a release notes describi
Thanks Sean, will do.
-Rob
On 16/05/14 17:52, Sean Mullan wrote:
Looks ok to me. While you are in there, can you fix the typo a couple
lines above that:
s/Retuns/Returns
You also need to add an appropriate "noreg" label to the bug.
--Sean
On 05/16/2014 10:29 AM, Rob McKenna wrote:
Hi
Thanks Seán!
Yes, I was in doubt which noreg- label to choose. noreg-sqe seems to be
more appropriate, so I set it.
Sincerely yours,
Ivan
On 19.05.2014 13:30, Seán Coffey wrote:
Hopefully a member of the security team can help review this Ivan. It
looks good to me. I'm not sure if QA run any
Hopefully a member of the security team can help review this Ivan. It
looks good to me. I'm not sure if QA run any smart card tests on mac -
doesn't look like it! It could be worth following up with them to ensure
they add this to their test configurations.
One note on the 'noreg-existing' lab
