> On Sep 15, 2016, at 11:53 PM, Michael Wang wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to understand what the -providerName option of keytool does. The
> documentation for -providerName just says:
>
> "Used to identify a cryptographic service provider's name when listed in the
> security properties file
> On Sep 16, 2016, at 2:30 AM, Bradford Wetmore
> wrote:
>
> As of today's JDK 9 code, look at the "prep" target" in the jdk/test/Makefile
> test directory. The "prep" target updates the DLLs as needed if this is not
> a repository (which I think is how our build/test system JPRT works).
I
I don't know a single place including all these things. In fact, in most cases
we avoid including a certificate directly in a test if it can be created on the
fly.
--Max
> On Sep 16, 2016, at 7:19 AM, Milton Smith wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I'm looking for a set of certificates, self-signed cert
Hi All,
I'm looking for a set of certificates, self-signed certs, cross-signed
certs, small chains, large chains, different critical and non-critical
sections, revoked certs, blacklisted certs, invalid, not yet valid, time
stamped, etc. I realize it's difficult to be comprehensive but is ther
Hi Xuelei, Chris,
Thank you for looking into it. Please see inline.
On 09/15/2016 12:53 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 15 Sep 2016, at 02:55, Xuelei Fan wrote:
On 9/15/2016 9:45 AM, Artem Smotrakov wrote:
Well, in this particular case it's not clear that it has the same issue
with free port (a
Max,
This is a known problem. We had a discussion on this a couple years
ago, but I don't know if there's been any additional work on this.
Perhaps Jon Gibbons might know? cc'ing him.
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2013-December/011316.html
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/p
Hi,
I'm trying to understand what the -providerName option of keytool does. The
documentation for -providerName just says:
"Used to identify a cryptographic service provider's name when listed in
the security properties file."
Which doesn't really say anything about how it should be used and the
Hi Sean,
Thank you for feedback. I've updated the bug report.
14.09.16 19:57, Sean Mullan wrote:
Thanks for the information. It would be very useful if you could add
that additional information as an example into the bug report for
future reference.
--Sean
On 09/14/2016 11:26 AM, Sergei Ko
On 15/09/16 08:53, Chris Hegarty wrote:
Anyway, as a free port is used, there are free-port issues. Please consider to
make the enhancement in the fix. Otherwise, you cannot avoid the intermittent
failure for this test case in the current testing environment.
+1. Please remove any use of t
On 15 Sep 2016, at 02:55, Xuelei Fan wrote:
>
> On 9/15/2016 9:45 AM, Artem Smotrakov wrote:
>> Well, in this particular case it's not clear that it has the same issue
>> with free port (at least to me). The exception occurred on client side,
>> so it's not the case where we don't know where the
10 matches
Mail list logo
