Hi Alan,
My apologies, finalizer removal, that's a positive step, I thought it
was motivated by "the code is trusted so we don't need to worry about
finalizer attacks".
Also apologies for the long email, but it seems appropriate for
information handover.
Atomic construction guarantee; if i
On 23/07/2021 23:33, Peter Firmstone wrote:
I think it's worth noting that there isn't a way to securely run code
with malicious intent now, so I'm surprised that at this late stage
you were still providing support for sand boxing (whack a mole).
It's just for us many assumptions have been mad
