The current JEP 411 plan of action, if left unchanged, will leave
developers who adopted the SM architecture as an authorization layer
unable to upgrade to later versions of Java, until finalizers and the
finalizer attack defensive methods in constructors are removed. JEP 411
has the potential
Am 2021-07-29 um 16:05 schrieb Sean Mullan:
Are you calling the PKCS12Attribute(String, String) constructor from
your code? That API currently specifies that String values are encoded
as UTF-8, so we could not change the behavior without a specification
change. Can you use the PKCS12Attribute(b
On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 23:10:33 GMT, Rajan Halade wrote:
> Update the test certificates.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 4bc9b049
Author:Rajan Halade
URL:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/commit/4bc9b049846bd59f5c41bd62a59b567b52c9efc5
Stats: 440 lines in 2 fi
> Update the test certificates.
Rajan Halade has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
or a rebase. The pull request now contains three commits:
- Merge branch 'master' into 8263059
- 8263059: update ProblemList.txt
- 8263059:
security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPa
On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 23:50:44 GMT, Rajan Halade wrote:
> Test certificates are updated.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: d6bb8461
Author:Rajan Halade
URL:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/commit/d6bb846159be7e46fba0c3ca2915617f945e0b42
Stats: 380 lines in 2 f
> Test certificates are updated.
Rajan Halade has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
or a rebase. The pull request now contains three commits:
- Merge branch 'master' into 8248899
- 8248899: update ProblemList.txt
- 8248899:
security/infra/java/security/cert/CertP
On Thu, 22 Jul 2021 22:52:14 GMT, Anthony Scarpino
wrote:
>> Yes, I know. Basically, we are trying to optimize performance by trying to
>> write into the supplied buffers (out) as much as we can. But then when tag
>> verification failed, the "written" bytes are erased w/ 0. Ideal case would
>
On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 18:40:14 GMT, Smita Kamath wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/com/sun/crypto/provider/GaloisCounterMode.java
>> line 717:
>>
>>> 715: in = new byte[Math.min(PARALLEL_LEN, srcLen)];
>>> 716: out = new byte[Math.min(PARALLEL_LEN, srcLen)];
>>
On Thu, 22 Jul 2021 17:57:13 GMT, Anthony Scarpino
wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/com/sun/crypto/provider/GaloisCounterMode.java
>> line 761:
>>
>>> 759: }
>>> 760:
>>> 761: dst.put(out, 0, rlen);
>>
>> This looks belong to the above if-block? I wonder how this
On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 23:10:33 GMT, Rajan Halade wrote:
> Update the test certificates.
Marked as reviewed by mullan (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4847
On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 23:50:44 GMT, Rajan Halade wrote:
> Test certificates are updated.
Marked as reviewed by mullan (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4849
On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 18:23:18 GMT, Valerie Peng wrote:
>> Ok.. Moving it into GCMEncrypt makes sense. Now that I look at the code
>> GCMDecrypt only uses it when passed to a method. GCMEncrypt uses it
>
> This is still present in the latest update. Is there another update coming?
Yes.
---
> I would like to submit AES-GCM optimization for x86_64 architectures
> supporting AVX3+VAES (Evex encoded AES). This optimization interleaves AES
> and GHASH operations.
> Performance gain of ~1.5x - 2x for message sizes 8k and above.
Smita Kamath has updated the pull request with a new target
On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 19:18:54 GMT, Valerie Peng wrote:
>> Smita Kamath has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Updated AES-GCM intrinsic to match latest Java Code
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/com/sun/crypto/provider/GaloisCount
On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 18:23:44 GMT, Valerie Peng wrote:
>> ok
>
> This is still present in the latest update. Is there another update coming?
Yes. There will be another update.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4019
On Thu, 22 Jul 2021 17:16:45 GMT, Anthony Scarpino
wrote:
>> Seems strange to have GCMOperation op defined in GCMEngine but not
>> initialized, nor used. The methods in GCMEngine which use op has an argument
>> named op anyway. Either you just use the "op" field (remove the "op"
>> argument)
On Thu, 22 Jul 2021 17:19:20 GMT, Anthony Scarpino
wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/com/sun/crypto/provider/GaloisCounterMode.java
>> line 650:
>>
>>> 648: int originalOutOfs = 0;
>>> 649: byte[] in;
>>> 650: byte[] out;
>>
>> The name "in", "out" are almost used
On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 01:30:37 GMT, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> could you please review this big tedious and trivial(-ish) patch which moves
>> `sun.hotspot.WhiteBox` and related classes to `jdk.test.whitebox` package?
>>
>> the majority of the patch is the following substitutions:
>
On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 14:24:52 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
> Please review this fix to remove the Validator.VAR_PLUGIN_CODE_SIGNING
> variant and related code that is no longer needed in the PKIX implementation.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 89f5c96d
Author:Sean Mullan
U
19 matches
Mail list logo
