On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 18:34:37 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
>>> @AlanBateman The process of modularization was not fully completed with
>>> Project Jigsaw, and a few ugly warts remained. I was under the impression
>>> that these should be addressed in follow-up fixes, but this was
>>> unfortunately
On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 00:12:38 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> A lot (but not all) of the data in make/data is tied to a specific module.
>> For instance, the publicsuffixlist is used by java.base, and fontconfig by
>> java.desktop. (A few directories, like mainmanifest, is *actually* used by
> A lot (but not all) of the data in make/data is tied to a specific module.
> For instance, the publicsuffixlist is used by java.base, and fontconfig by
> java.desktop. (A few directories, like mainmanifest, is *actually* used by
> make for the whole build.)
>
> These data files should move
> A lot (but not all) of the data in make/data is tied to a specific module.
> For instance, the publicsuffixlist is used by java.base, and fontconfig by
> java.desktop. (A few directories, like mainmanifest, is *actually* used by
> make for the whole build.)
>
> These data files should move
> A lot (but not all) of the data in make/data is tied to a specific module.
> For instance, the publicsuffixlist is used by java.base, and fontconfig by
> java.desktop. (A few directories, like mainmanifest, is *actually* used by
> make for the whole build.)
>
> These data files should move
On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 21:56:53 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> make/modules/jdk.charsets/Gensrc.gmk line 32:
>>
>>> 30: # Generate files using the charsetmapping tool
>>> 31: #
>>> 32: CHARSET_DATA_DIR := $(TOPDIR)/src/java.base/share/data/charsetmapping
>>
>> Is it intentional to leave
On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 21:31:08 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> Magnus Ihse Bursie has updated the pull request with a new target base due
>> to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 12 commits:
>>
>> - Merge branch 'master' into shuffle-data-reborn
>> - Fix merge
>> - Merge tag
On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 18:31:55 GMT, Alisen Chung wrote:
>> msg drop for jdk19, Mar 9, 2022
>
> Alisen Chung has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> removed incorrect translation of compiler configuration file
LGTM. Thanks for the
On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 23:50:20 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> A lot (but not all) of the data in make/data is tied to a specific module.
>> For instance, the publicsuffixlist is used by java.base, and fontconfig by
>> java.desktop. (A few directories, like mainmanifest, is *actually* used by
On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 15:14:53 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> Removing permission checks which, in the presence of a Security Manager,
>> would check for a RuntimePermission "className.subclass". This was to
>> prevent subclassing these classes, but is no longer necessary with strong
>>
On 16/03/2022 08:44, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
:
If you have such strong opinions on the data files shared between
java.base and jdk.charsets/jdk.localedata, I propose we leave them in
make/data for the time being, clean up the associated mess, and then
work out where they actually should
On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 23:50:20 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> A lot (but not all) of the data in make/data is tied to a specific module.
>> For instance, the publicsuffixlist is used by java.base, and fontconfig by
>> java.desktop. (A few directories, like mainmanifest, is *actually* used by
> msg drop for jdk19, Mar 9, 2022
Alisen Chung has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
removed incorrect translation of compiler configuration file
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7765/files
-
On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 23:50:20 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> A lot (but not all) of the data in make/data is tied to a specific module.
>> For instance, the publicsuffixlist is used by java.base, and fontconfig by
>> java.desktop. (A few directories, like mainmanifest, is *actually* used by
On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 20:22:16 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote:
> Removing permission checks which, in the presence of a Security Manager,
> would check for a RuntimePermission "className.subclass". This was to
> prevent subclassing these classes, but is no longer necessary with strong
> encapsulation
On 2022-03-16 07:31, Alan Bateman wrote:
Magnus,
This proposal does not address the previous concerns. As before, you
are proposing to put the data files used to generate the classes for
jdk.localedata and jdk.charsets into src/java.base and I don't think
we should do that. I really think
Magnus,
This proposal does not address the previous concerns. As before, you are
proposing to put the data files used to generate the classes for
jdk.localedata and jdk.charsets into src/java.base and I don't think we
should do that. I really think this PR needs to be withdraw n or closed
17 matches
Mail list logo
