Re: DTLS Support

roject/requirement for the use_srtp extension? As would help me plan for > the priority for the support. > > > I'm thinking about to support more flexible extension customization, but for > now it is not easy to add extension from application level. > > Thanks, > Xuelei

DTLS Support

When DTLS support was added in https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8043758 DTLS-SRTP and WebRTC were specifically mentioned in the motivation. However, DTLS- SRTP requires the ‘use_srtp’ extension to be in the handshake.

Re: Jar's CodeSigner null on Java 10, non-null on Java 8

a little surprised that a security issue like this would linger for so long. I guess with the removal of applet and web start support this issue wasn’t deemed as serious as it otherwise would be. Regards, Scott > On Oct 7, 2018, at 3:49 AM, Alan Bateman wrote: > > On 06/10/2018 06:21, Sco

Re: Jar's CodeSigner null on Java 10, non-null on Java 8

ir/testKeystore", '-storepass', 'testing', '-keypass', 'testing', jar.archivePath, 'test_alias' ] } } } Regards, Scott > On Oct 6, 2018, at 1:21 AM, Scott Palmer wrote: > > As is too often the case

Jar's CodeSigner null on Java 10, non-null on Java 8

Sean asked: > On what version of Java 8 does it work? > Up to 8u181 at least. > > I am not sure what the problem is without additional information. > > What do you need? I will try to sign something trivial with the same cert > and create a test case for a bug report. > > Also, have you

Re: Jar's CodeSigner null on Java 10, non-null on Java 8

issue to bother you guys about. Sorry. Scott > On Oct 6, 2018, at 12:24 AM, Scott Palmer wrote: > > Sean asked: >> On what version of Java 8 does it work? >> > > Up to 8u181 at least. >> I am not sure what the problem is without additional information. >

Jar's CodeSigner null on Java 10, non-null on Java 8

Excuse me if this isn’t the right place to ask this. I’ve been trying to debug something related to verifying that a class was signed with a particular certificate. The certificate is self-signed and long expired, if that makes a difference. I have the following code to check the signature: