Re: RFR: 8259021 avoid double racy reads from non-volatile fields of SharedSecrets [v2]

2021-01-04 Thread Richard Reingruber
On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 15:11:27 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote: >> Peter Levart has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> revert the unrelated change > > The bug title and the PR title need to be the same. > Editing either one is fine. But

Re: RFR: 8259021 avoid double racy reads from non-volatile fields of SharedSecrets [v2]

2021-01-04 Thread Roger Riggs
On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 14:27:09 GMT, Peter Levart wrote: >> See: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8259021 >> See also discussion in thread: >> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2020-December/072798.html > > Peter Levart has updated the pull request incrementally with one

Re: RFR: 8259021 avoid double racy reads from non-volatile fields of SharedSecrets [v2]

2021-01-04 Thread Claes Redestad
On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 14:27:09 GMT, Peter Levart wrote: >> See: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8259021 >> See also discussion in thread: >> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2020-December/072798.html > > Peter Levart has updated the pull request incrementally with one

Re: RFR: 8259021 avoid double racy reads from non-volatile fields of SharedSecrets [v2]

2021-01-04 Thread Peter Levart
> See: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8259021 > See also discussion in thread: > https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2020-December/072798.html Peter Levart has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: revert the