Changeset: 5c406a747192
Author:chegar
Date: 2013-04-14 19:17 +0100
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/5c406a747192
8011799: CompletableFuture/Basic.java fails intermittently
Reviewed-by: martin, alanb
! test/java/util/concurrent/CompletableFuture/Basic.java
Hi All
Please take a look at the fix at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8005527/webrev.00/
The test was tagged "manual" which is because I do run it manually and
directly in a console window. Turns out this "manual" only means it is
ignored by "jtreg -a" but still launch-able with plain
>> ... Especially, I make Handshaker public and pass it
>> to KerberosClientKeyExchangeImpl so that its context can be used to
>> check permissions. Is this necessary? I mean, is the context any
>> different from the one inside KerberosClientKeyExchangeImpl?
The access control context is reserved f
On 1/21/2013 7:25 AM, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> Hello,
>
> quite some time back I reported a bug, that the SSLSocket of Java will
> terminate connections to servers which respond with a unrecognized_name
> alert.
>
> http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7127374
>
> This was intr
On 4/15/13 11:05 AM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
... Especially, I make Handshaker public and pass it
to KerberosClientKeyExchangeImpl so that its context can be used to
check permissions. Is this necessary? I mean, is the context any
different from the one inside KerberosClientKeyExchangeImpl?
The acce
>> Do you want to file a simple enhancement request (CCC)?
>
> Why CCC? This is all internal.
>
Yes, it is optional. I think, now it can accept unbound principal in
server side, it is an enhancement. It would be nice to have the
community and SQE know the improvement.
>>
>> . KerberosClientKeyEx
On 4/15/13 1:38 PM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
Do you want to file a simple enhancement request (CCC)?
Why CCC? This is all internal.
Yes, it is optional. I think, now it can accept unbound principal in
server side, it is an enhancement. It would be nice to have the
community and SQE know the improv
