New JEP Candidate: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/332
- Mark
A few comments so far; have not finished my review yet.
General comment:
Many of these tests test more than XDH. That is fine and good for
increasing coverage, but have you looked through existing tests to see
if you are duplicating anything we are already testing and maybe those
tests could
The updated webrev looks good.
--Sean
On 3/27/18 4:23 PM, Adam Petcher wrote:
After the last code review[1] on this topic completed, it was suggested
that I add some more "spec enforcement" to the XDH service. The code
hasn't been integrated yet, so I'm doing this as a follow-on review
under
Is it possible that this could make Java 11, or is that a long shot?
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 11:36 AM, wrote:
> New JEP Candidate: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/332
>
> - Mark
--
- DML