On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 22:38:24 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> Add code to call XML signing using internal APIs. The implementation was also
> fixed back in JDK-8259535 but not covered by the new test there.
Marked as reviewed by mullan (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/
On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 22:38:24 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> Add code to call XML signing using internal APIs. The implementation was also
> fixed back in JDK-8259535 but not covered by the new test there.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 221e4b9c
Author:Weijun Wang
URL:
The following test has been seen to fail intermittently on Windows platform:
sun/security/ssl/DHKeyExchange/LegacyDHEKeyExchange.java
with the exception:
java.net.SocketException: An established connection was aborted by the
software in your host machine
The test seems to be suffering from some
> The following test has been seen to fail intermittently on Windows platform:
> sun/security/ssl/DHKeyExchange/LegacyDHEKeyExchange.java
> with the exception:
> java.net.SocketException: An established connection was aborted by the
> software in your host machine
>
> The test seems to be suffer
On 08/03/21 12:40, Sean Mullan wrote:
> It is to the point where I only skim your emails
> quickly. I would take the time to write up your ideas in an external place.
> It may not go anywhere, but at least you would have a single place where
> your proposal, experiments, etc are documented.
I wou
2021/8/3 9:40:58 -0700, sean.mul...@oracle.com:
> On 8/2/21 8:28 PM, Peter Firmstone wrote:
>> ...
>>
>> Having established that OpenJDK is not yet willing to compromise, I have
>> been attempting to create an authorization layer using Agents, so that I
>> can restore perimeter security following
> On 4 Aug 2021, at 01:19, Peter Firmstone wrote:
>
> Excellent, Ron, that's exactly what I'm after.
>
> I need to be able to implement an authorization layer on top of the JDK, but
> reach down into the JDK to use authorization to control access.
>
> Can we find out how many such checks tha
On Mon, 2 Aug 2021 19:31:54 GMT, Martin Balao wrote:
> As described in JDK-8271566 [1], this patch proposal is intended to fix a
> problem that arises when using DSA keys that have a 256-bits (or larger) G
> parameter for signatures (either signing or verifying). There were some
> incorrect as
On 8/3/21 8:10 PM, Peter Firmstone wrote:
On 4/08/2021 2:40 am, Sean Mullan wrote:
On 8/2/21 8:28 PM, Peter Firmstone wrote:
In JGDMS without SM, at least the following must be addressed to
maintain security:
1. TLS and Kerberos connections cannot be established. (My
software is
On Mon, 2 Aug 2021 19:31:54 GMT, Martin Balao wrote:
> As described in JDK-8271566 [1], this patch proposal is intended to fix a
> problem that arises when using DSA keys that have a 256-bits (or larger) G
> parameter for signatures (either signing or verifying). There were some
> incorrect as
On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 20:19:12 GMT, Jack Hartstein
wrote:
> The RC5ParameterSpec class description contains the following sentence: "This
> class can be used to initialize a Cipher object that implements the RC5
> algorithm as supplied by RSA Security LLC, or any parties authorized by RSA
> Secu
11 matches
Mail list logo
