> [VerifySignature] INFO: Verification successful for URI "#idsigValidImage"
> [VerifySignature] The XML signature in file
> file:/home/mullan/tmp/Word-plugin-signature.xml is invalid ! (bad)
>
> What JDK version are you using?
>
> --Sean
>
> Jean-
re] The XML signature in file
> file:/home/mullan/tmp/Word-plugin-signature.xml is invalid ! (bad)
>
> What JDK version are you using?
>
> --Sean
>
> Jean-Luc Cooke wrote:
> > Thank you, Raul.
> >
> > I've tried in v1.3.0 and v1.4.0, both complain the s
gt;document and the code you are using?
>And thanks for telling.
> Regards,
>Raul,
>
>On 2/26/07, Jean-Luc Cooke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> To help things along,
> Here's the output from Aleksey's tool. Notice how it verifies
Is the fact that ApacheXMLSec cannot verify idsigInvalidImage and
idsigValidImage a bug?
JLC
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 09:54:15AM -0500, Jean-Luc Cooke wrote:
> Sorry to ping here.
>
> Can anyone point me in the direction of "If this a bug with Apache XMLSec?"
>
> I'd rea
Sorry to ping here.
Can anyone point me in the direction of "If this a bug with Apache XMLSec?"
I'd really exect the evil empire of Microsoft and Apache to interoperate.
JLC
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 02:37:47PM -0500, Jean-Luc Cooke wrote:
> Hello team,
>
> I tried to
Hello team,
I tried to verify the following XML file (not a root'd web cert, sorry):
https://216.191.58.251/apache-xmlsec-help/Word-plugin-signature.xml
Using the org.apache.xml.security.samples.signature.VerifySignature class that
is found in src_samples directory and got this:
java -cp
.:.
http://xml.apache.org/security/Java/index.html
Says:
"Version 1.1 released on 7 April 2004. Includes a beta implementation of
XML Encryption together with minor bug fixes for the XML Signature code."
Does that mean 1.3 is also only Beta XML encryption support?
Cheers,
JLC
.2.96.jar'.
> >The same problem occurs even when the latest 'xmlsec-1.4.Beta2.jar' is
> >used.
> >
> >Jean-Luc Cooke certainkey.com> writes:
> >> I'd offer, but let me get the Samples working first. ;)
> >>
> >> JLC
> >
Team,
I had a question about how xmlsec (the standard) processes elements that are
base64 encoded.
Will these two structures be hashed to the same value? Will the encoding
attribute be added to the hash? Will both "6dnN..." payloads be base64
decoded before being processed?
Thanks a million.
I'm finding the same thing, apache's xmlsec is going very smoothly
(ignoring 1 or 3 brain farts).
Nope, XML templates. It seems to be the easiest way to use his library.
http://www.aleksey.com/xmlsec/api/xmlsec-examples-sign-template-file.html
JLC
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 03:42:30PM -0400, SCOT
.appendObject(receipt);
sig.addDocument("#Receipt");
As long as it's here in a public forum for all to find next time.
JLC
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 03:13:25PM -0400, Jean-Luc Cooke wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Wanted how to do this (if it's possible with apache
Greetings,
Wanted how to do this (if it's possible with apache xmlsec, or even allowed
by the standard).
I want to insert "rec.xml" into "doc.xml" as you see attached here and sign
the whole thing.
Trying to fight with appendChild() and DocumentBuilder.parse() keeps getting
me exceptions saying
I'd like to ask the apache-xmlsec folk what their thoughts are on aleksey's
xmlsec application/library.
Do you do inter-operability testing with it? Why does he use templates so
much and I've had a hard time finding any mention of templates in
apache-xmlsec?
Are high-level comparison would be gr
t changes.
JLC
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 03:06:22PM -0400, Jean-Luc Cooke wrote:
> Looking around the internet, I see that this message usually means I don't
> have the latest JCE.
>
> However, even after I update it with the one from Sun's site (1.5, matching
> my jvm) the
Looking around the internet, I see that this message usually means I don't
have the latest JCE.
However, even after I update it with the one from Sun's site (1.5, matching
my jvm) the problem does not go away.
Any hints you can give me? I'll promise to update some of the web pages. :)
Cheers,
s,
>
> Raul
>
> On 8/29/06, Jean-Luc Cooke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Sure thing.
> >
> >I can find no bugzilla on the http://xml.apache.org/security
> >site. Using the search tool doesn't help either. Where do I find it?
> >It would be ni
enito wrote:
> Thanks,
> It seems a problem can you create a bug report in bugzilla.
>
> Regards,
>
> Raul
>
> On 8/29/06, Jean-Luc Cooke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Team,
> >
> >I've downloaded the 1.3.0 binary package and I'm having
Team,
I've downloaded the 1.3.0 binary package and I'm having trouble runnin the
samples. Am I missing somethingi really obvious here? I can't find any
reference to "Cannot resolve element with ID Body" using google.
Cheers,
JLC
javac org/apache/xml/security/samples/AxisSigner.java
java org.a
18 matches
Mail list logo
