RE: [VOTE] Native JCE Proposal

2004-03-05 Thread Davanum Srinivas
let's start with at least "jce implementation enough to implement the mandatory pieces of dsig and xmlenc" -- dims --- Scott Cantor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In my mind, the naming should somehow reflect the aim of the project > > (which is something that also seems to be less than clear to

Re: [VOTE] Native JCE Proposal

2004-03-05 Thread Noah Levitt
quot; and "Office" and "Outlook". > > -Original Message- > From: Erwin van der Koogh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 05 March 2004 09:55 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Native JCE Proposal > > > > One thing that does worry m

RE: [VOTE] Native JCE Proposal

2004-03-05 Thread Scott Cantor
> In my mind, the naming should somehow reflect the aim of the project > (which is something that also seems to be less than clear to me in > the proposal). Make Java xmlsec usable for high-volume deployments. It's currently not, and hardware acceleration for Java is hard to get for some platform

Re: [VOTE] Native JCE Proposal

2004-03-05 Thread Mads Toftum
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 10:54:41AM +0100, Erwin van der Koogh wrote: > Anyone know of an opersource project called juice? > Yes - http://juicy.sourceforge.net/ In my mind, the naming should somehow reflect the aim of the project (which is something that also seems to be less than clear to me in t

RE: [VOTE] Native JCE Proposal

2004-03-05 Thread Kenworthy, Edward (EDS)
Funny. I heard a vague rumour that someone trademarked the words "Windows" and "Excel" and "Office" and "Outlook". -Original Message- From: Erwin van der Koogh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 March 2004 09:55 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:

Re: [VOTE] Native JCE Proposal

2004-03-05 Thread Erwin van der Koogh
One thing that does worry me about Juice - are we going to run into an trademark issues? There is no way you can trademark such a generic word. So I doubt it. The only problem I can think of is that juice is an already existing library that does something to resemble what we are trying to do. An

Re: [VOTE] Native JCE Proposal

2004-03-05 Thread Berin Lautenbach
One thing that does worry me about Juice - are we going to run into an trademark issues? Cheers, Berin Axl Mattheus wrote: Sorry Noah! You're right Native JCE must have been in the mix. Ax/ Berin Lautenbach wrote: Seems to me that "native-jce" ought to be one of the choices of names.

Re: [VOTE] Native JCE Proposal

2004-03-05 Thread Axl Mattheus
Sorry Noah! You're right Native JCE must have been in the mix. Ax/ Berin Lautenbach wrote: Seems to me that "native-jce" ought to be one of the choices of names. Nevertheless: That'll teach me to do things quickly :<. You are absolutely correct - it should have been, and my apologies for

Re: [VOTE] Native JCE Proposal

2004-03-04 Thread Berin Lautenbach
> Seems to me that "native-jce" ought to be one of the choices > of names. Nevertheless: That'll teach me to do things quickly :<. You are absolutely correct - it should have been, and my apologies for dropping it. I got overly excited with all the other suggestions. Nothing is locked in stone a

Re: [VOTE] Native JCE Proposal

2004-03-04 Thread Noah Levitt
Seems to me that "native-jce" ought to be one of the choices of names. Nevertheless: +1 for the proposal +1 for Juice Noah On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 13:56:16 +1100, Berin Lautenbach wrote: > > > 1. Juice > 2. Janice > 3. Juice 'n Jin > > > To start : > > > +1 for the proposal and +1 for "Jui

Re: [VOTE] Native JCE Proposal

2004-03-04 Thread Walter Hoehn
+1 to Proposal +1 to Juice

Re: [VOTE] Native JCE Proposal (fwd)

2004-03-04 Thread Axl Mattheus
Committers. Voting so far... Committers: [+1] Berin Lautenbach (Juice) [+1] Axl Mattheus (Juice) [+1] Erwin van der Koogh (Janice) [+1] Karel Wouters (Juice) non-Committers: [+1] Davanum Srinivas (Janice) [] Scott Cantor [] Walter Hoehn [] Others? Looks like it is go on proposal and go on J

Re: [VOTE] Native JCE Proposal (fwd)

2004-03-04 Thread Karel Wouters
> >> Also - the suggested names were : > >> > >> > >> 1. Juice > >> 2. Janice > >> 3. Juice 'n Jin > >> > >> > >> To start : > >> > > Committers: > > [+1] Berin Lautenbach (Juice) > [+1] Axl Mattheus (Juice) > [+1] Erwin van der Koogh (Janice) > [] Karel Wouters > +1 Juice sounds OK to me too

Re: [VOTE] Native JCE Proposal (fwd)

2004-03-04 Thread Erwin van der Koogh
Forgot some stuff.. Link to proposal: http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?XMLProjectPages/OpenSSLJCEProp osal Also - the suggested names were : 1. Juice 2. Janice 3. Juice 'n Jin To start : Committers: [+1] Berin Lautenbach (Juice) [+1] Axl Mattheus (Juice) [+1] Erwin van der Koogh (

Re: [VOTE] Native JCE Proposal

2004-03-04 Thread Davanum Srinivas
+1 to Proposal (non-binding) +1 to Janice (non-binding) --- Erwin van der Koogh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Also - the suggested names were : > >> > >> > >> 1. Juice > >> 2. Janice > >> 3. Juice 'n Jin > >> > >> > >> To start : > >> > > Committers: > > [+1] Berin Lautenbach > [+1] Axl Mat

Re: [VOTE] Native JCE Proposal

2004-03-04 Thread Erwin van der Koogh
Also - the suggested names were : 1. Juice 2. Janice 3. Juice 'n Jin To start : Committers: [+1] Berin Lautenbach [+1] Axl Mattheus [+1] Erwin van der Koogh [] Karel Wouters non-Committers: [] Davanum Srinivas [] Scott Cantor [] Walter Hoehn [] Others?

Re: [VOTE] Native JCE Proposal

2004-03-03 Thread Axl Mattheus
Berin Lautenbach wrote: Peoples, The next step is to put the project proposal to the XML committers (and then the PMC) to get them to vote. That can take time (we will need at least a week with the committers and then we need a unanimous vote from the PMC - I really need to do something about th

[VOTE] Native JCE Proposal

2004-03-03 Thread Berin Lautenbach
Peoples, The next step is to put the project proposal to the XML committers (and then the PMC) to get them to vote. That can take time (we will need at least a week with the committers and then we need a unanimous vote from the PMC - I really need to do something about this process). So to