Re: .NET and Apache Java Interoperability

2005-04-13 Thread Vishal Mahajan
Davanum Srinivas wrote: WSE 2.0 SP3? Yes. But I figured out the problem - It was something to do with the XmlElement.SetAttribute (3 arg) method of .NET. This implementation of this method is really weird and I seriously recommend not using it. Thanks, Vishal (http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/

Re: .NET and Apache Java Interoperability

2005-04-13 Thread Davanum Srinivas
WSE 2.0 SP3? (http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=1BA1F631-C3E7-420A-BC1E-EF18BAB66122&displaylang=en) -- dims On 4/13/05, Vishal Mahajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Okay, the WSE problem is kind of weird. When you assign "wsu:Id" to the > soap body, WSE fails to verify its

Re: .NET and Apache Java Interoperability

2005-04-13 Thread Vishal Mahajan
Okay, the WSE problem is kind of weird. When you assign "wsu:Id" to the soap body, WSE fails to verify its own signed message!, so I don't expect Java library to verify it. But if you assign only an "Id" attribute, everything works fine. Vishal Davanum Srinivas wrote: Vishal, what's the problem

Re: .NET and Apache Java Interoperability

2005-04-13 Thread Raul Benito
Sorry Vishal, I haven't time to look to the problem, it is good to see you find where the trouble is. Regards,On 4/13/05, Vishal Mahajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: After more investigation I feel that the Java library is fine. Eventhough I'm still having some WS-Security issues, they mainly seem to

Re: .NET and Apache Java Interoperability

2005-04-13 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Vishal, what's the problem u are having with WSE? thanks, dims On 4/13/05, Vishal Mahajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > After more investigation I feel that the Java library is fine. Even > though I'm still having some WS-Security issues, they mainly seem to be > on the WSE2 side, which I'll try

Re: .NET and Apache Java Interoperability

2005-04-13 Thread Vishal Mahajan
After more investigation I feel that the Java library is fine. Even though I'm still having some WS-Security issues, they mainly seem to be on the WSE2 side, which I'll try raising on some .NET forum. Thanks, Vishal Vishal Mahajan wrote: Yes it shows in my email also, but the actual document doe

Re: .NET and Apache Java Interoperability

2005-04-11 Thread Vishal Mahajan
Yes it shows in my email also, but the actual document doesn't have this. Anyways, I've also attached the tared document this time. Thanks, Vishal Raul Benito wrote: Hi Vishal, The digest method look very weird to me: http://www.w3.org/! 2000/09/xmldsig#sha1" /> Perhaps it something in my emai

Re: .NET and Apache Java Interoperability

2005-04-11 Thread Raul Benito
Hi Vishal,   The digest method look very weird to me: http://www.w3.org/!  2000/09/xmldsig#sha1" /> Perhaps it something in my email, but you can take a look there. Regards, On Apr 11, 2005 9:12 PM, Vishal Mahajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've attached the soap document signed by .NET (

Re: .NET and Apache Java Interoperability

2005-04-11 Thread Vishal Mahajan
I've attached the soap document signed by .NET (interop_dotnet_sig.xml) and the certificate (apcert1.cer) to be used for verification. The reference validation fails for the soap body. Note that the 'ID Type' attribute used on the soap body is a wsu:Id and hence WssIdResolver (attached) needs t

Re: .NET and Apache Java Interoperability

2005-04-11 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Vishal, we've implemented WS-Security UsernameToken and X509 profiles in Apache WSS4J using XML-Security. Yes, we have complete interop with Microsoft WSE -- dims On 4/11/05, Raul Benito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Vishal, > can you post the document? > > > On Apr 11, 2005 11:22 AM, Vishal

Re: .NET and Apache Java Interoperability

2005-04-11 Thread Raul Benito
Hi Vishal,can you post the document?On Apr 11, 2005 11:22 AM, Vishal Mahajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:I know this topic has been raised earlier on the list. I would like toknow if someone has got Apache xml-security-J interoperating with the.NET (Microsoft WSE)? I've been trying to debug this for