DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28153] New: - NullPointerException from Reference.calculateDigest()

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Multithread

Title: Multithread     Where can I find more info about XMLMutex class? It is used in XSec ThreadTest.cpp, but Xerces doesn't use it in it's ThreadTest.cpp. It is used when one wants to access global scope variables in multithread environment? Thank you, Milan

RE: Problem with verification of .NET signed XML

Hi Vishal, Sometime back, there was a discussion going on about this cascading in one thread with subject "going from signing xml file with DTD to signing xml file with Schema". Do you any clue about the conclusion? Can't I somehow stop cascading? Please do suggest me. Thanks & Regards, Ayyappa

Re: Problem with verification of .NET signed XML

All: I think this might be an important issue. The namespace attributes cascading is carried out by the Java dsig code even if canonicalization transformation is not required to be performed. Is this correct behavior? Vishal GANDHIRAJAN,AYYAPPAN (HP-India,ex2) wrote: Hi Vishal, Sometime back

Re: Multithread

Milan, XMLMutex is a wrapper class defined in Xerces. It provides a very basic mutex using whatever is available on the platform in question. We used it in threadtest as the theory is it should allow the mutex code to move from platform without having to worry about whether you are in a pthr

Re: Problem with verification of .NET signed XML

Vishal, It's correct, but unfortunate behaviour. The namespaces have to be cascaded due to the spec using an XPath model for defining how canonicalisation is performed. DOM does not perfectly match to XPath, particularly where it comes to namespaces. Normally you can bypass it, but there ar

[Fwd: Re: Juice]

FYI - I'd say we are a go! Original Message Subject: Re: Juice Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 23:29:14 -0500 From: Greg Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Berin Lautenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi Berin, That's perfectly fine with me, go right ahead and use that name. -Greg Scott Kokopelli-

Re: Use of the name Juice

Hi Berin >@2004.04.02_04:57:26_+0200 You're more than welcome to use the name Juice. > We are in the process of setting up a project to implement a JCE provider > using OpenSSL. > > > In discussions, the team came up with the name JuiCE as an option, whic

[GUMP@lsd]: xml-security/xml-security failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For help understanding the request please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project xml-security has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue aff

[GUMP@lsd]: xml-security/xml-security failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For help understanding the request please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project xml-security has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue aff

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28153] - NullPointerException from Reference.calculateDigest()

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu