Re: [Selenium-devel] RFC: new "technical-less" locators

2005-10-18 Thread Mike Williams
On 18/10/2005, "Dominique Quatravaux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd very, very much like the resulting script to be immune to > technical changes such as changing to > . For what it's worth, I've found that internal ("technical") field-names actually tend to remain fairly static, while user-v

Re: [Selenium-devel] RFC: new "technical-less" locators

2005-10-18 Thread Dominique Quatravaux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thanks for your reply! Aahz wrote: > > Why not require them to use Firefox and one of the Selenium > recorders? Because tests may need to be written ahead of time, when the application does not work yet. Also, I'd very, very much like the resulting

Re: [Selenium-devel] RFC: new "technical-less" locators

2005-10-18 Thread Aahz
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005, Dominique Quatravaux wrote: > > My first planned contribution is about going "technical-less" in > Selenese scripts. My target environment requires the scripts to be > written by non-techies, who don't know "view source" or "DOM > inspector" and don't want to learn. Therefore

[Selenium-devel] RFC: new "technical-less" locators

2005-10-18 Thread Dominique Quatravaux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear Selenium developers, First, thanks a lot for the great work. Selenium is IMHO doing a bunch of things differently *and* right, and thus stands a step ahead of all the other Web testing frameworks that I know of. I'm working to integrate Selenium

[Selenium-devel] FireFox and URLReferrer

2005-10-18 Thread Alexander Popov
1. when Selenium open some link, UrlRefferer is equal selenium location, not source test page. 2. when target page redirect to URLReferrer it's open selenium in bottom frame   how to  resolve this problem? ___ Selenium-devel mailing list Selenium-devel@li