On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 2:02 PM Hollis Blanchard
wrote:
>
> On 08/13/2018 02:18 PM, Tom Cherry wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 1:49 PM Hollis Blanchard
> > wrote:
> >> On 08/13/2018 01:45 PM, Tom Cherry wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 12:43 PM Hollis Blanchard
> >>> wrote:
> The
On 08/13/2018 02:18 PM, Tom Cherry wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 1:49 PM Hollis Blanchard
wrote:
On 08/13/2018 01:45 PM, Tom Cherry wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 12:43 PM Hollis Blanchard
wrote:
The __atomic_* GCC primitives were introduced in GCC 4.7, but Red Hat
Enterprise Linux 6.x
On 08/13/2018 01:45 PM, Tom Cherry wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 12:43 PM Hollis Blanchard
wrote:
The __atomic_* GCC primitives were introduced in GCC 4.7, but Red Hat
Enterprise Linux 6.x (for example) provides GCC 4.4. Tweak the current code to
use the (most conservative)
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 1:49 PM Hollis Blanchard
wrote:
>
> On 08/13/2018 01:45 PM, Tom Cherry wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 12:43 PM Hollis Blanchard
> > wrote:
> >> The __atomic_* GCC primitives were introduced in GCC 4.7, but Red Hat
> >> Enterprise Linux 6.x (for example) provides GCC
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 12:43 PM Hollis Blanchard
wrote:
>
> The __atomic_* GCC primitives were introduced in GCC 4.7, but Red Hat
> Enterprise Linux 6.x (for example) provides GCC 4.4. Tweak the current code to
> use the (most conservative) __sync_synchronize() primitive provided by those
>
The __atomic_* GCC primitives were introduced in GCC 4.7, but Red Hat
Enterprise Linux 6.x (for example) provides GCC 4.4. Tweak the current code to
use the (most conservative) __sync_synchronize() primitive provided by those
older GCC versions.
Fixes