Re: [PATCH-selinuxns] selinux: Annotate lockdep for services locks

On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 9:40 AM, peter enderborg wrote: > I will send the patches to pauls next tree. Im abit confused on when that is > appropriate. Obviously there will be collisions with the namespace, but > the patches also solves few of my prerequisite topics. In an

Re: [PATCH-selinuxns] selinux: Annotate lockdep for services locks

On Fri, 2018-02-02 at 15:40 +0100, peter enderborg wrote: > Resent with sign-off. > If you pick the patches that use the dynamic allocation of locks you > can pick it. > The patches for the annotation does not apply for the selinux-next at > the moment > so have to be for selinuxns. > I will send

Re: [PATCH-selinuxns] selinux: Annotate lockdep for services locks

Resent with sign-off. If you pick the patches that use the dynamic allocation of locks you can pick it. The patches for the annotation does not apply for the selinux-next at the moment so have to be for selinuxns. I will send the patches to pauls next tree. Im abit confused on when that is

Re: [PATCH-selinuxns] selinux: Annotate lockdep for services locks

On Fri, 2018-02-02 at 09:05 +0100, Peter Enderborg wrote: > The locks are moved to dynamic allocation, we need to > help the lockdep system to classify the locks. > This adds to lockdep annotation for the page mutex and > for the ss lock. Thanks, but missing a Signed-off-by: line. Also, just to